Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Eff ects of Prestorage Application of Gum Arabic Coating on the Quality of Table Eggs During Storage

Sofralık Yumurtalarda Depolama Öncesi Gam Arabik Kaplama Uygulamasının Yumurta Kalitesine Etkileri

Pages
363–370
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Th e eggs coated with 10% gum arabic solution had the lowest egg weight loss (2.71%), and albumen pH (9.18), and the highest egg specific gravity (1.057 g/cm3) at the end of storage (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Th e aim of this study was to investigate the eff ect of gum arabic coating on the quality characteristics of table eggs during 28 days of storage at 4°C and 25°C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Treatments were compared in a 2 x 4 factorial design with two diff erent storage temperatures (4°C and 25°C) and five prestorage coating applications (control, 1% gum arabic (G1), 5% gum arabic (G5), and 10% gum arabic (G10) solution).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Th e eggs coated with 10% gum arabic solution had the lowest egg weight loss (2.71%), and albumen pH (9.18), and the highest egg specific gravity (1.057 g/cm3) at the end of storage (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Th e aim of this study was to investigate the eff ect of gum arabic coating on the quality characteristics of table eggs during 28 days of storage at 4°C and 25°C. Treatments were compared in a 2 x 4 factorial design with two diff erent storage temperatures (4°C and 25°C) and five prestorage coating applications (control, 1% gum arabic (G1), 5% gum arabic (G5), and 10% gum arabic (G10) solution). Egg quality characteristics that were measured included weight loss, specific gravity, shell strength, Haugh unit, yolk index, and albumen pH. Th e eggs coated with 10% gum arabic solution had the lowest egg weight loss (2.71%), and albumen pH (9.18), and the highest egg specific gravity (1.057 g/cm3) at the end of storage (P

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı gam arabik kaplaması uygulanmış sofralık yumurtların 4°C ve 25°C’de 28 günlük depolama süresince yumurta kalite özelliklerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Muameleler, iki farklı depolama sıcaklığı (4°C ve 25°C) ve beş adet depolama öncesi uygulama (kontrol, %1 gam arabik (G1), %5 gam arabik (G5) ve %10 gam arabik (G10)) ile 2 x 4 faktöriyel deneme deseninde karşılaştırılmıştır. Yumurta kalite özellikleri olarak yumurta ağırlık kaybı, özgül ağırlık, kabuk mukavemeti, Haugh birimi, yumurta sarısı indeksi ve ak pH’sı incelenmiştir. Depolama sonunda en düşük yumurta ağırlığı kaybı (%2.71) ve ak pH’sı (9.18) ve en yüksek yumurta özgül ağırlığı (1.057 g/cm3) değerleri %10 gam arabik solusyonu ile kaplanmış yumurtalarda tespit edilmiştir (P

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, A., ÇOKLAR, H., SARIYEL, V., AKBULUT, M., NARİNÇ, D. (2022). Eff ects of Prestorage Application of Gum Arabic Coating on the Quality of Table Eggs During Storage. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 363–370. https://ajindex.com/articles/569470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Chambers JR, Zaheer K, Akhtar H, Abdel-Aal E-SM: Chicken eggs. In, Hater P (Ed): Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvementsed. 1-9, Elsevier, 2017
  2. Usaga J, Acosta O, Sullivan EK, Padilla-Zakour OI: Pickling eggs. In, Hater P (Ed): Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvementsed., 405-413, Elsevier, 2017
  3. Akyurek H, Okur AA: Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J Anim Vet Adv, 8 (10): 1953-1958, 2009
  4. Scott T, Silversides FG: The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poult Sci, 79 (12): 1725-1729, 2000. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.12.1725 5. Aktan S: Effects of age and storage duration on relationships among albumen quality traits and egg weight in Japanese quails. J Anim Vet Adv, 10 (Suppl.): 3340-3344, 2011. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.3340.3344 6. Baylan M, Canogullari S, Ayasan T, Copur G: Effects of dietary selenium source, storage time, and temperature on the quality of quail eggs. Biol Trace Elem Res, 143 (2): 957-964, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x 7. Copur G, Camci O, Sahinler N, Gul A: The effect of propolis egg shell coatings on interior egg quality. Arch Geflugelkd, 72 (1): 35-40, 2008
  5. Silversides FG, Budgell K: The relationships among measures of egg albumen height, pH, and whipping volume. Poult Sci, 83 (10): 1619-1623, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.10.1619 9. Agregán R, Munekata PES, Putnik P, Pateiro M, Bursać Kovačević D, Zavadlav S, Lorenzo JM: The use of novel technologies in egg processing. Food Rev Int, 1-21, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2021.1980887 10. Yüceer M, Caner C: The impact of coatings and novel processing techniques on the functionality of table eggs during extended storage period at ambient temperature. J Food Process Preserv, 45 (3):e15261, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/JFPP.15261 11. Sahinler N, Gul A, Copur G: Chemical composition and preservative effect of Turkish propolis on egg quality durig storage. Asian J Chem, 21 (3): 1877-1886, 2009
  6. Bhale S, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W, Farr AJ, Nadarajah K, Meyers SP: Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. J Food Sci, 68 (7): 2378-2383, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05776.x 13. Caner C, Cansiz O: Effectiveness of chitosan‐based coating in improving shelf‐life of eggs. J Sci Food Agric, 87 (2): 227-232, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2698 14. Yi SZ, Liu Q, Xu D, Li DM: Preservation effects of chitosan/nanomontmorillonite coating on clean eggs. Packag Eng, 7:12, 2017
  7. Caner C, Yuceer M: Maintaining funct