Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Protective Effects of Oral Sirolimus Therapy against ESWL-induced Kidney Tissue Damage in Rats

Ratlarda ESWL Sonrası Oluşan Böbrek Doku Hasarında Oral Sirolimus Tedavisinin Etkisi

Pages
190–195
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The statistical significance was accepted as p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the short- and long-term protective effects of oral sirolimus therapy on extracorporealshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)-induced kidney tissue damage in an experimental rat model.Materials and Methods: Twenty-four male Spraque-Dawley rats were used in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 1000 shock waves (SWs) were applied to theleft kidney of all rats at 15 kV, 60 SW/min.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The statistical significance was accepted as p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the short- and long-term protective effects of oral sirolimus therapy on extracorporealshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)-induced kidney tissue damage in an experimental rat model.Materials and Methods: Twenty-four male Spraque-Dawley rats were used in the study. A total of 1000 shock waves (SWs) were applied to theleft kidney of all rats at 15 kV, 60 SW/min. Two main groups, ESWL (group 1) and ESWL sirolimus (group 2), were formed. Each group was dividedinto two subgroups as early (E) and late (L). Left nephrectomy was performed on the 15th day in E groups and on the 60th day in L groups. Tubularinjury, interstitial changes, as well as scar formation, were scored semi-quantitatively for at least 10 cortical fields in each sample. An average scorewas calculated for each subject. Independent samples t-test was used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance was accepted as p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, deneysel rat modelinde oral sirolimus tedavisinin ekstrakorporeal şok dalgası tedavisi (ESWL) sonrası oluşabilecek böbrek dokusu hasarı üzerine kısa ve uzun dönemde koruyucu etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 24 erkek Spraque-Dawley rat kullanıldı. Tüm ratların sol böbreğine 15 kV, 60 SW/dk’da toplam 1000 şok dalgası uyguladı. İki ana grup, ESWL (grup 1) ve ESWL sirolimus (grup 2) oluşturuldu. Her grup erken (E) ve geç (L) olmak üzere iki alt gruba ayrıldı. Sol nefrektomi 15. günde E gruplara, 60. günde L gruplara yapıldı. Tübüler hasar, interstisyel değişiklikler ve skar oluşumu, her denekte en az 10 kortikal alanı için yarı kantitatif olarak skorlandı. Her denek için ortalama bir puan hesaplandı. İstatistiksel analiz için bağımsız örneklem t-testi kullanıldı. İstatistiksel anlamlılık p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEN, E., BOSTANCI, Y., MERCİMEK, M. N., SARIKAYA, Ş. (2022). Protective Effects of Oral Sirolimus Therapy against ESWL-induced Kidney Tissue Damage in Rats. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 190–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/568717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette J. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention. european urology 2006;50:981-990
  2. McAteer JA, Evan AP. The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy. Seminars in nephrology. Vol 28: Elsevier; 2008:200-213
  3. Wang Q, Usinger W, Nichols B, Gray J, Xu L, Seeley TW, Brenner M, Guo G, Zhang W, Oliver N. Cooperative interaction of CTGF and TGF-β in animal models of fibrotic disease. Fibrogenesis & tissue repair 2011;4:4
  4. Wang S, Wilkes MC, Leof EB, Hirschberg R. Noncanonical TGF-β pathways, mTORC1 and Abl, in renal interstitial fibrogenesis. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 2009;298:F142-F149
  5. Stepkowski S. Preclinical results of sirolimus treatment in transplant models. Transplantation proceedings. Elsevier; 2003:219-226
  6. Li X, He D, Zhang L, Cheng X, Sheng B, Luo Y. A novel antioxidant agent, astragalosides, prevents shock wave-induced renal oxidative injury in rabbits. Urological research 2006;34:277-282
  7. Mateu PB, Alba AB, Liatsikos E, Villa MT, López-Acón J, de Guzmán Ordaz D, Tormo FB. Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy a current treatment for urolithiasis? A systematic review. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) 2017;41:426-434
  8. Fankhauser CD, Kranzbuehler B, Poyet C, Hermanns T, Sulser T, Steurer J. Long-term adverse effects of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: a systematic review. Urology 2015;85:991-1006
  9. Newman R, Hackett R, Senior D, Brock K, Feldman J, Sosnowski J, Finlayson B. Pathologic effects of ESWL on canine renal tissue. Urology 1987;29:194- 200
  10. Mustafa M, Aburas H, Helo FM, Qarawi L. Electromagnetic and electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy-induced urothelial damage: is there a difference? Journal of endourology 2017;31:180-184
  11. Sheir KZ, El-Ghar MA, Elshal AM, Elsaadany MM, Taha D-E, El-Nahas AR. Evaluation of acute post-shock wave lithotripsy renal changes by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective clinical study. The Journal of urology 2014;192:1705-1709
  12. Li K, Lin T, Zhang C, Fan X, Xu K, Bi L, Han J, Huang H, Liu H, Dong W. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of urology 2013;190:1260-1267
  13. Dhar NB, Thornton J, Karafa MT, Streem SB. A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with s