Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Varicocelectomy in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia

Obstrüktif Olmayan Azospermili Hastalarda Varikoselektomi

Pages
320–324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were no predictive factors affecting the appearance of the sperm in the ejaculate.Conclusion: Varicocelectomy should be considered a treatment option for men with NOA having a palpable varicocele.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We evaluated the outcomes of varicocelectomy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and a palpable varicocele.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 25 male patients with NOA having a palpable varicocele, between May 2006 and December2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Age, duration of infertility, testicular volume, grade and side of varicocele, varicocelectomy technique, and serum follicle-stimulating hormone,serum luteinizing hormone and serum testosterone levels were analyzed.Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.68±3.91 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were no predictive factors affecting the appearance of the sperm in the ejaculate.Conclusion: Varicocelectomy should be considered a treatment option for men with NOA having a palpable varicocele.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the outcomes of varicocelectomy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and a palpable varicocele.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 25 male patients with NOA having a palpable varicocele, between May 2006 and December2018. Age, duration of infertility, testicular volume, grade and side of varicocele, varicocelectomy technique, and serum follicle-stimulating hormone,serum luteinizing hormone and serum testosterone levels were analyzed.Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.68±3.91 years. Of the 25 patients, 5 (20%) had motile sperm in the ejaculate in the postoperativesemen analysis. There were no predictive factors affecting the appearance of the sperm in the ejaculate.Conclusion: Varicocelectomy should be considered a treatment option for men with NOA having a palpable varicocele.

Özet

Amaç: Palpe edilebilir varikoseli ve obstrüktif olmayan azospermisi olan erkeklerin tedavisinde varikoselektomi sonucunu değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Mayıs 2006 ile Aralık 2018 arasında, palpe edilebilen varikoseli olan 25 obstrüktif olmayan azospermik erkeği retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Bu hastaların yaşı, infertilite süresi, testis hacmi, varikosel derecesi, varikoselin tarafı, varikoselektomi tekniği, serum folikül uyarıcı hormon, serum lüteinleştirici hormon ve serum testosteron düzeyleri belirlendi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 30,68±3,91 yıldı. Yirmi beş hastanın 5’inde (%20) postoperatif semen analizinde ejakülatta hareketli sperm görüldü. Ejakülatta sperm görülmesini etkileyen hiçbir faktör bulunamadı. Sonuç: Palpe edilebilir varikoseli olan obstrüktif olmayan azospermik erkekler için varikoselektomi bir tedavi seçeneği olarak düşünülmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özer, C., Güvel, S., Turunç, T., Gören, M. R., Gül, Ü. (2022). Varicocelectomy in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 320–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/568702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hassanin AM, Ahmed HH, Kaddah AN. A global view of the pathophysiology of varicocele. Andrology 2018;6:654-661
  2. Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Cayan S, Kandirali E, Erdemir F, Tellaloglu S. Microsurgical inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Urology 2001;57:328-333
  3. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Asian J Androl 2016;18:246-253
  4. Esteves SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol 2005;31:541-548
  5. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1970;21:606-609
  6. WHO W. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. World Health Organization, Geneva 2010
  7. Jaffe TM, Kim ED, Hoekstra TH, Lipshultz LI. Sperm pellet analysis: a technique to detect the presence of sperm in men considered to have azoospermia by routine semen analysis. J Urol 1998;159:1548-1550
  8. Moorhead PS, Nowell PC, Mellman WJ, Battips DM, Hungerford DA. Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res 1960;20:613-616
  9. Krausz C, Hoefsloot L, Simoni M, Tuttelmann F, European Academy of A, European Molecular Genetics Quality N. EAA/EMQN best practice guidelines for molecular diagnosis of Y-chromosomal microdeletions: state-of-the-art 2013. Andrology 2014;2:5-19
  10. Marmar JL, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol 1994;152:1127-1132
  11. Johnson D, Sandlow J. Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes. Fertil Steril 2017;108:378-384
  12. Kupis L, Dobronski PA, Radziszewski P. Varicocele as a source of male infertility - current treatment techniques. Cent European J Urol 2015;68:365-370
  13. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993;59:613-616
  14. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, Weidner W, Zini A. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol 2011;60:796-808
  15. Alkan I, Yuksel M, Canat HL, Atalay HA, Can O, Ozveri H, Basar MM. Superoxide Anion Production by the Spermatozoa of Men with Varicocele: Relationship with Varicocele Grade and Semen Parameters. Wor