Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Bladder Neck and Urethra Preservation Modified Posterior Approach: Short-term Oncological and Functional Results of the First 108 Patients

Mesane Boynu ve Üretra Koruyucu Modifiyeli Posterior Yaklaşımlı Laparoskopik Radikal Prostatektomi: İlk 108 Hastanın Kısa Dönem Onkolojik ve Fonksiyonel Sonuçları

Pages
309–315
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among 58 patients with at least 2 years follow-up, PSA recurrence was detected only in two patients.Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a bladder neck and urethra protective modified posterior approach may be an option in the selected patient group in terms of short-term oncological and functional results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Short-term oncological and functional results of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRRP) with a bladder neck and urethra preservation modified posterior approach (Demirtaş Erciyes Modification) are presented.Materials and Methods: The data of 140 patients who were operated between July 2015 and March 2020 for localized prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 32 patients were excluded from evaluation because a history of transurethral prostate resection or bladder neck preservation could not be applied due to the median lobe protruding into the bladder.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among 58 patients with at least 2 years follow-up, PSA recurrence was detected only in two patients.Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a bladder neck and urethra protective modified posterior approach may be an option in the selected patient group in terms of short-term oncological and functional results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Short-term oncological and functional results of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRRP) with a bladder neck and urethra preservation modified posterior approach (Demirtaş Erciyes Modification) are presented.Materials and Methods: The data of 140 patients who were operated between July 2015 and March 2020 for localized prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 32 patients were excluded from evaluation because a history of transurethral prostate resection or bladder neck preservation could not be applied due to the median lobe protruding into the bladder. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate biopsies, preoperative erectile function status, operation time, transfusion rate, complications, pathology results of LRRP, postoperative erectile function, and continence status were evaluated.Results: The mean age of 108 patients was 64±4.47 years, with median PSA of 9.65 ng/mL. The mean operation time was 186.96±54.1 min, and the median catheter removal time was 10 days. The median hospital stay was 4 days. The median follow-up time was 17.5 months. The prostatectomy pathology of 95% of patients was at pT2 stage. The complication rate of Clavien 3 and above was 4.6%. The surgical margin positivity rate was 10.2%. Continence rates were 88% and 92.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The rate of erection with spontaneous or oral medications was 43.5%. Among 58 patients with at least 2 years follow-up, PSA recurrence was detected only in two patients.Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a bladder neck and urethra protective modified posterior approach may be an option in the selected patient group in terms of short-term oncological and functional results.

Özet

Amaç: Mesane boynu ve üretra koruyucu modifiyeli posterior yaklaşımlı (Demirtaş Erciyes Modifikasyonu) laparoskopik radikal prostatektomi uyguladığımız hastaların kısa dönem onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçları sunulmuştur. Gereç ve Yöntem: Temmuz 2015-Mart 2020 tarihleri arasında lokalize prostat kanseri nedeni ile opere edilen 140 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Otuz iki hastaya transüretral prostat rezeksiyonu öyküsü veya mesaneye indante median lob nedeniyle mesane boynu koruyucu protokol uygulanamadığı için değerlendirme dışı bırakıldı. Preoperatif prostat-spesifik antijen (PSA), prostat biyopsileri patoloji sonuçları, preoperatif ereksiyon durumları, operasyon süresi, transfüzyon miktarı, komplikasyonlar, patolojik sonuçlar, postoperatif ereksiyon ve kontinans durumları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yüz sekiz hastanın ortalama yaşı 64±4,47 yıl, median PSA: 9,65 ng/mL’di. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 186,96±54,1dk, median 10. gün sonda çekildi. Ortanca yatış günü 4 gündü. Ortanca takip süresi 17,5 aydı. Hastaların %95’in prostatektomi patolojisi pT2 evresindeydi. Clavien 3 ve üstü komplikasyon oranı %4,6’ydı. Cerrahi sınır pozitiflik oranı %10,2’ydi. Kontinans oranları 6 ve 12. ayda sırası ile %88 ve %92,6’tü. Spontan veya oral medikasyonlar ile ereksiyon sağlanma oranı ise %43,5’ti. İki yıllık takibi olan 58 hasta içinde sadece iki hastada PSA nüksü tespit dildi. Sonuç: Mesane boynu ve üretra koruyuculu modifiye posterior yaklaşımlı laparoskopik prostatektomi kısa dönem onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar açısından seçilmiş hasta grubunda bir seçenek olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, T., TOMBUL, Ş. T., DEMİRTAŞ, A., SÖNMEZ, G. (2022). Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Bladder Neck and Urethra Preservation Modified Posterior Approach: Short-term Oncological and Functional Results of the First 108 Patients. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 309–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/568663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, vanden Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2017;71:618-629
  2. Eggleston JC, Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexualfunction: pathological findings in the first 100 cases. J Urol 1985;134:1146-1148
  3. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Eastham JA, Ficarra V, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Novara G, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Van Poppel H, Mottrie A, Pasadena Consensus Panel. Bestpractices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2012;62:368-381
  4. Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, Woo HH, Laguna MP, Shemshaki H. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol 2018;36:609-621
  5. Caillet K, Lipsker A, Alezra E, De Sousa P, Pignot G. [Surgical approach andsexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy]. Prog Urol 2017;27:283-296
  6. De Carlo F, Celestino F, Verri C, Masedu F, Liberati E, Di Stasi SM. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes: a systematic review. Urol Int 2014;93:373-383
  7. Tandogdu Z, Vale L, Fraser C, Ramsay C. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of the Use of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy in Surgery Compared with Open or Laparoscopic Surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2015;13:457-467
  8. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radicalprostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854-857
  9. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Laparoscopicradical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 1999;36:14-20
  10. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 2001;40:54-64
  11. Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Rozet F, Galiano M, Benoist N, Stakhovsky O, Vallancien G. Radical prostatectomy: evolution of surgical technique from the laparoscopic point of view. Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:129-139;