SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Abdominal and Transvaginal Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistula and Analyzing the Factors Affecting Its Recurrence

Vezikovajinal Fistülün Cerrahi Tedavisinde Abdominal ve Transvajinal Tekniklerin Karşılaştırılması ve Nükse Etki Eden Faktörlerin Analizi

Fuat KIZILAY
Bayram ALİYEV
Ceyhun ÖZYURT
Turan ÖZDEMİR
Serdar KALEMCİ
Adnan ŞİMŞİR
Pages
238–244
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of the factors related to fistula and surgicaltechniques.Results: The number of cases with radiotherapy history was found to be higher in the recurrent group (68.2% vs 11.5%, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the abdominal and transvaginal techniques in the surgical treatment of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) and analyze the factorsaffecting its recurrence rate.Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups according to the operation technique used (abdominal-transvaginal) and therecurrence status (recurrent and non-recurrent).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: To compare the abdominal and transvaginal techniques in the surgical treatment of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) and analyze the factorsaffecting its recurrence rate.Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups according to the operation technique used (abdominal-transvaginal) and therecurrence status (recurrent and non-recurrent).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of the factors related to fistula and surgicaltechniques.Results: The number of cases with radiotherapy history was found to be higher in the recurrent group (68.2% vs 11.5%, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the abdominal and transvaginal techniques in the surgical treatment of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) and analyze the factorsaffecting its recurrence rate.Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups according to the operation technique used (abdominal-transvaginal) and therecurrence status (recurrent and non-recurrent). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of the factors related to fistula and surgicaltechniques.Results: The number of cases with radiotherapy history was found to be higher in the recurrent group (68.2% vs 11.5%, p

Özet

Amaç: Vezikovajinal fistül (VVF) onarımında abdominal ve transvajinal tekniklerin karşılaştırılması ve nükse etki eden faktörlerin analizini yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastalar operasyon tekniğine göre (abdominal-transvajinal) ve nüks durumuna göre (nüks edenler-nüks etmeyenler) gruplara ayrıldı. Fistül ve cerrahi yöntemlerle ilişkili faktörlerin karşılaştırılması, çalışmanın birincil sonlanım noktasıydı. Bulgular: Radyoterapi öyküsü olan olgu sayısı rekürren grupta daha fazlaydı (%68,2 vs %11,5, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILAY, F., ALİYEV, B., ÖZYURT, C., ÖZDEMİR, T., KALEMCİ, S., ŞİMŞİR, A. (2022). Comparison of the Abdominal and Transvaginal Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistula and Analyzing the Factors Affecting Its Recurrence. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 238–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/568660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alio AP, Merrell L, Roxburgh K, Clayton HB, Marty PJ, Bomboka L, Traoré S, Salihu HM. The psychosocial impact of vesico-vaginal fistula in Niger. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284:371-378
  2. Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Tiitinen A. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:113-118
  3. Angioli R, Penalver M, Muzii L, Mendez L, Mirhashemi R, Bellati F, Crocè C, Panici PB. Guidelines of how to manage vesicovaginal fistula. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003;48:295-304
  4. Eilber KS, Kavaler E, Rodriguez LV, Rosenblum N, Raz S. Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition. J Urol 2003;169:1033-1036
  5. Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. The Lancet 2006;368:1201-1209
  6. Latzko W. Postoperative vesicovaginal fistulas: genesis and therapy. Am J Surg 1942;58:211-228
  7. O’Conor VJ, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ, Nanninga JB. Suprapubic closure of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 1973;109:51-54
  8. Lytton B. Vesicovaginal fistula: postsurgical. Current therapy in genitourinary surgery. 1992:261-265
  9. Zoubek J, McGuire EJ, Noll F, DeLancey JO. The late occurrence of urinary tract damage in patients successfully treated by radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. J Urol 1989;141:1347-1349
  10. Iselin CE, Aslan P, Webster GD. Transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistulas after hysterectomy by vaginal cuff excision. J Urol 1998;160:728-730
  11. Wein AJ, Malloy TR, Carpiniello VL, Greenberg SH, Murphy JJ. Repair of vesicovaginal fistula by a suprapubic transvesical approach. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980;150:57-60
  12. Blaivas JG, Heritz DM, Romanzi LJ. Early versus late repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: vaginal and abdominal approaches. J Urol 1995;153:1110-1112; discussion 1112-1113
  13. Demirel A, Polat O, Bayraktar Y, Gul O, Okyar G. Transvesical and transvaginal reparation in urinary vaginal fistulas. Int Urol Nephrol 1993;25:439-444
  14. Bodner-Adler B, Hanzal E, Pablik E, Koelbl H, Bodner K. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0171554
  15. O’Conor VJ, Sokol JK. Vesicovaginal fistula from the standpoint of the urologist. J Urol 1951;66:579-585
  16. Nesrallah LJ, Srougi M, Gittes RF. The O’Conor technique: the gold standard for supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula repair. J Urol 1999;161:566-568
  17. Enzelsberger H, Gitsch E. Surgical management of vesicovaginal