Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Pain Scores During Retrieval of Ureteral Stents Using Rigid Cystoscope Versus Rigid Ureteroscope in an Office Setting: A Prospective Study

Bir Ofis Ortamında Rijit Sistoskop ile Rijit Üreteroskop Kullanılarak Üreteral Stentlerin Alınması Sırasında Ağrı Skorlarının Karşılaştırılması: Prospektif Bir Çalışma

Pages
172–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Painexperienced during the procedure and during the first void thereafter were recorded using visual analog scale.Results: The patients who underwent stent retrieval using rigid cystoscope (mean 7.05±1.21) had a significantly higher (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Ureteral stents inserted to prevent obstruction to the flow of urine need to be removed after they serve the purpose of their insertion.The most commonly practiced method for stent removal is using a rigid cystoscope in an office setting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we compared the pain scores during ureteral stent retrieval using a rigid cystoscope and a rigid ureteroscope.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 64 male patients with ureteral stents who were divided into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Painexperienced during the procedure and during the first void thereafter were recorded using visual analog scale.Results: The patients who underwent stent retrieval using rigid cystoscope (mean 7.05±1.21) had a significantly higher (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Ureteral stents inserted to prevent obstruction to the flow of urine need to be removed after they serve the purpose of their insertion.The most commonly practiced method for stent removal is using a rigid cystoscope in an office setting. However, it is quite painful and may requiregeneral anesthesia especially in males. Due to their small caliber, rigid ureteroscope can reduce patient discomfort during ureteral stent retrievalprocedure. In this study, we compared the pain scores during ureteral stent retrieval using a rigid cystoscope and a rigid ureteroscope.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 64 male patients with ureteral stents who were divided into two groups. GroupA had 36 patients who underwent stent retrieval with rigid cystoscope while group B had 28 patients who underwent with rigid ureteroscope. Painexperienced during the procedure and during the first void thereafter were recorded using visual analog scale.Results: The patients who underwent stent retrieval using rigid cystoscope (mean 7.05±1.21) had a significantly higher (p

Özet

Amaç: İdrar akışının tıkanmasını önlemek için yerleştirilen üreteral stentler, yerleştirilme amacına hizmet ettikten sonra çıkarılmalıdır. Stentin çıkarılması için en sık uygulanan yöntem, muayenehane koşullarında rijit bir sistoskop kullanmaktır. Bununla birlikte, oldukça ağrılıdır ve özellikle erkeklerde genel anestezi gerektirebilir. Küçük kalibreleri nedeniyle, rijit üreteroskop, üreter stent ekstraksiyon prosedürü sırasında hastanın rahatsızlığını azaltabilir. Bu çalışmada, rijit bir sistoskop ve rijit bir üreteroskop kullanarak yapılan üreter stent ekstraksiyonu sırasındaki ağrı skorlarını karşılaştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Üreteral stentli 64 erkek hasta iki gruba ayrılarak prospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Grup A, rijit sistoskop ile stent ekstraksiyonu yapılan 36 hasta; grup B ise rijit üreteroskop ile stent ekstraksiyonu yapılan 28 hastadan oluşmakta idi. İşlem sırasında ve sonrasındaki ilk idrar çıkışı sırasında yaşanan ağrı görsel analog skala kullanılarak kaydedildi. Bulgular: Rijit sistoskop kullanılarak stent ekstraksiyonu yapılan hastalar (ortalama 7,05±1,21), rijit üreteroskop kullanılarak stent ekstraksiyonu yapılanlara göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek (p

🔖

Cite This Article

NEELİ, S. I., NUTALPATİ, S. H. (2022). Comparison of Pain Scores During Retrieval of Ureteral Stents Using Rigid Cystoscope Versus Rigid Ureteroscope in an Office Setting: A Prospective Study. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 172–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/568633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Beysens M, Tailly TO. Ureteral stents in urolithiasis. J Urol 2018;5:274-286
  2. Zumstein V, Betschart P, Albrich WC, Buhmann MT, Ren Q, Schmid HP, Abt D. Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - incidence, clinical impact, and prevention. Swiss Med Wkly 2017;147:14408
  3. El-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, Husain I. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 1991;146:e1487-e1491
  4. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Matsuzaki J. Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol 2012;26:e178-e82
  5. Fro¨hlich M, Fehr J, Sulser T, Eberli D, Mortezavi A. Extraction strings for ureteric stents: is there an increased risk for urinary tract infections? Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:e936-e40
  6. Kim JH, Park SY, Kim MG, Choi H, Song D, Cho SW, Song YS. Pain and satisfaction during rigid cystoscopic ureteral stent removal: a preliminary study. BMC Urol 2014;14:90
  7. Loh-Doyle JC, Low RK, Monga M, Nguyen MM. Patient experiences and preferences with ureteral stent removal. J Endourol 2015;29:e35-e40
  8. Karthikeyan VS, Keshavamurthy R, Mallya A, Chikka Moga Siddaiah M, Kumar S, Chandrashekar CR. Efficacy of preprocedural diclofenac in men undergoing double J stent removal under local anesthesia: A double-blind, randomized control trial. Indian J Urol 2017;33:53-57
  9. Rassweiler,MC, Michel MS, Ritter M, Honeck P. Magnetic Ureteral Stent Removal Without Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endourol 2017;31:762-766
  10. Barros AA, Rita A, Duarte C, Pires RA, Sampaio‐Marques B, Ludovico P, Lima E, Mano JF, Reis RL. Bioresorbable ureteral stents from natural origin polymers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:608‐617
  11. Byrne RR, Auge BK, Kourambas J, Munver R, Delvecchio F, Preminger GM. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureterpyeloscopy: a randomized trial. J Endourol 2002;16:9-13
  12. Chen YT, Chen J, Wong WY, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Wang CC. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2002;167:1977-1980
  13. Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR. The effect of ureteral stent placement on post-ureteroscopy complications: a meta-analysis. Urology 2008;71:796-800
  14. Oliver R, Wells H, Traxer O, Knoll T, Aboumarzouk O, Biyani CS, Somani BK; YAU Group. Ureteric s