SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Effect of Positive Surgical Margin on Survival After Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer: Long-term Results of a Single Center

Böbrek Hücreli Kanserlerde Parsiyel Nefrektomi Sonrası Pozitif Cerrahi Sınırın Sağkalıma Etkisi: Tek Merkezin Uzun Dönem Sonuçları

Mehmet Çağlar ÇAKICI
Sercan SARI
Nihat KARAKOYUNLU
Levent SAĞNAK
Alihan KOKURCAN
Fatih SANDIKÇI
Osman Raif KARABACAK
Hikmet TOPALOĞLU
Hamit ERSOY
Pages
316–324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the non-ischaemic procedures in group 1 were higher (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk factors that cause positive surgical margin (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) and the effect of PSM on oncological outcomes in a single-centre cohort.Materials and Methods: Patients with PSM (group 1) were identified and contrasted with the negative surgical margin (group 2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Further, the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to estimate the differences in survival analysis.Results: A total of 302 patients had PN, of which 38 (12.6%) had PSM.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the non-ischaemic procedures in group 1 were higher (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk factors that cause positive surgical margin (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) and the effect of PSM on oncological outcomes in a single-centre cohort.Materials and Methods: Patients with PSM (group 1) were identified and contrasted with the negative surgical margin (group 2). Further, the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to estimate the differences in survival analysis.Results: A total of 302 patients had PN, of which 38 (12.6%) had PSM. In addition, the non-ischaemic procedures in group 1 were higher (p

Özet

Amaç: Parsiyel nefrektomi (PN) sonrası pozitif cerrahi sınıra (PSM) neden olan risk faktörlerini ve PSM’nin onkolojik sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisini tek merkezli bir kohortta değerlendirmek.Gereç ve Yöntem: PSM’li hastalar (grup 1) belirlendikten sonra negatif cerrahi sınırlı (grup 2) hastalar ile karşılaştırıldı. Kaplan-Meier eğrileri ve Cox-regresyon modelleri, sağkalım analizindeki farklılıkları tahmin etmek için kullanıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 302 hastaya PN yapıldı ve bunların 38’inde (%12,6) PSM vardı. Grup 1’de iskemik olmayan operasyonlar daha fazlaydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKICI, M. Ç., SARI, S., KARAKOYUNLU, N., SAĞNAK, L., KOKURCAN, A., SANDIKÇI, F., KARABACAK, O. R., TOPALOĞLU, H., ERSOY, H. (2022). Effect of Positive Surgical Margin on Survival After Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer: Long-term Results of a Single Center. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 316–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/568627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Colombel M, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Marreaud S, Collette S, Sylvester R. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephronsparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;59:543-552
  2. Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, Campbell S, Van Poppel H. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol 2014;65:372-377
  3. Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S, Rogers C, Stifelman M, Tanagho YS, Kumar R, Gorin MA, Sivarajan G, Samarasekera D, Allaf ME. Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 2013;190:1674-1679
  4. Shah PH, Moreira DM, Okhunov Z, Patel VR, Chopra S, Razmaria AA, Alom M, George AK, Yaskiv O, Schwartz MJ, Desai M, Vira MA, Richstone L, Landman J, Shalhav AL, Gill I, Kavoussi LR. Positive surgical margins increase risk of recurrence after partial nephrectomy for high risk renal tumors. J Urol 2016;196:327–334
  5. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Eggener SE, Pettus JA, Kwon ED, Herr HW, Blute ML, Russo P. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008;179:2158-163
  6. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, Thuret R, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Mottet N, Zini L, Bertini R, Salomon L, Villers A, Soulie M, Bellec L, Rischmann P, De la Taille A, Avakian R, Crepel M, Ferriere JM, Bernhard JC, Dujardin T, Pouliot F, Rigaud J, Pfister C, Albouy B, Guy L, Joniau S, van Poppel H, Lebret T, Culty T, Saint F, Zisman A, Raz O, Lang H, Spie R, Wille A, Roigas J, Aguilera A, Rambeaud B, Martinez Piñeiro L, Nativ O, Farfara R, Richard F, Roupret M, Doehn C, Bastian PJ, Muller SC, Tostain J, Belldegrun AS, Patard JJ. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2010;57:466-471
  7. Kwon EO, Carver BS, Snyder ME, Russo P. Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 2007;99:286-289
  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213
  9. Fuhrman SA, Lasky