Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Sacral Neuromodulation Treatment for Non-neurogenic Urological Disorders: Experience of a Single Center in Turkey

Pages
261–265
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After a mean follow-up of 42.3 months, the overall success rate was 87.5% for all indications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We evaluated the success rate and complications of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with non-neurogenic urological disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with an overactive bladder (OAB), bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/ IC), and idiopathic non-obstructive urinary retention (IUR), who underwent SNM between 2015 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After a mean follow-up of 42.3 months, the overall success rate was 87.5% for all indications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the success rate and complications of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with non-neurogenic urological disorders. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with an overactive bladder (OAB), bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/ IC), and idiopathic non-obstructive urinary retention (IUR), who underwent SNM between 2015 and 2020. SNM was recommended for patients with OAB and BPS/IC who previously had unsuccessful conservative and medical therapies and botulinum toxin injections. Success was defined as more than 50% improvement in clinical symptoms or voiding diary parameters in patients with OAB; more than 50% improvement in storage symptoms or subjective pain improvement or improvement after pain medications in patients with BPS/IC; more than 50% reduction in urethral catheterization rate in patients with IUR. We reviewed the success rates and complications. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent the first stage of SNM and 16 patients (66.6%) received permanent implantation. Ten patients were female (62.5%) and six were male (37.5%). The mean age was 36.9 years. Seven patients (43.7%) had OAB, three patients (18.7%) had BPS/IC, and six patients (37.5%) had IUR. After a mean follow-up of 42.3 months, the overall success rate was 87.5% for all indications. The success rate was 100%, 100%, and 66.7% for OAB, BPS/IC, and IUR, respectively. Four patients underwent surgical reintervention: two had their devices removed due to failure (50%), one had their implantable pulse generator (IPG) repositioned due to serious pain (25%), and one changed IPG due to malfunction (25%). Conclusion: SNM is a safe and effective minimally invasive therapy for patients with non-neurogenic urological disorders.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRDAL, M., TOPUZ, B., COĞUPLUGİL, A. E., YILMAZ, S., ZOR, M., KAYA, E. (2022). Sacral Neuromodulation Treatment for Non-neurogenic Urological Disorders: Experience of a Single Center in Turkey. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 261–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/568617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, Lycklama á Nijholt AA, Siegel S, Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Fall M, Gajewski JB, Hassouna MM, Cappellano F, Elhilali MM, Milam DF, Das AK, Dijkema HE, van den Hombergh U. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 2007;178:2029- 2034
  2. Tutolo M, Ammirati E, Heesakkers J, Kessler TM, Peters KM, Rashid T, Sievert KD, Spinelli M, Novara G, Van der Aa F, De Ridder D. Efficacy and Safety of Sacral and Percutaneous Tibial Neuromodulation in Non-neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol 2018;73:406-418
  3. Zhang P, Wang JY, Zhang Y, Liao L, Lv JW, Ling Q, Wei ZQ, Zhong T, Xu ZH, Wen W, Li JY, Luo DY. Results of Sacral Neuromodulation Therapy for Urinary Voiding Dysfunction: Five-Year Experience of a Retrospective, Multicenter Study in China. Neuromodulation 2019;22:730-737
  4. Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, Holtz C, Kesha J, Siegel SW. Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution’s 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:19-36
  5. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-178. 6. van de Merwe JP, Nordling J, Bouchelouche P, Bouchelouche K, Cervigni M, Daha LK, Elneil S, Fall M, Hohlbrugger G, Irwin P, Mortensen S, van OphovenA, Osborne JL, Peeker R, Richter B, Riedl C, Sairanen J, Tinzl M, Wyndaele JJ. Diagnostic criteria, classification, and nomenclature for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: an ESSIC proposal. Eur Urol 2008;53:60-67
  6. Phé V, de Wachter S, Rouprêt M, Chartier-Kastler E. How to define a refractory idiopathic overactive bladder? Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:2-11
  7. Peeters K, Sahai A, De Ridder D, Van Der Aa F. Long-term follow-up of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 2014;113:789-794
  8. Ismail S, Chartier-Kastler E, Perrouin-Verbe MA, Rose-Dite-Modestine J, Denys P, Phé V. Long-Term Functional Outcomes of S3 Sacral Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Idiopathic Overactive Bladder. Neuromodulation 2017;20:825-829
  9. Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, Gr