Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Urachal Remnants and Anomalies in Children: Rationales of Surgery

Pages
63–67
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with umbilical discharge presented significantly younger than patients with abdominal pain or incidentally recognized patients (2.4±1.2, 7.2±1.17, and 10.9±3.1 years, respectively; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Urachal remnants are rare conditions in children with controversial management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many of them present with complaints; however, the causality between the symptom and the condition is unclear, and a significant proportion of patients are incidentally identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with umbilical discharge presented significantly younger than patients with abdominal pain or incidentally recognized patients (2.4±1.2, 7.2±1.17, and 10.9±3.1 years, respectively; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Urachal remnants are rare conditions in children with controversial management. Many of them present with complaints; however, the causality between the symptom and the condition is unclear, and a significant proportion of patients are incidentally identified. Meanwhile, indications of the surgical correction are controversial and the best way of surgical approach depends on the attending physician’s experience. This study aimed to evaluate the results of surgically corrected urachal conditions in children. Materials and Methods: This study included patients (n=21) who underwent surgery for urachal conditions between 2010 and 2020. Age, presenting symptoms, radiological evaluation, surgical approach, and results, and histological results are retrospectively evaluated. Results: Of the patients, 12 (57%) were boys, and abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (43%). The exact anomaly could not be classified in 8 patients, but classified as urachal sinus (n=5), urachal cyst (n=4), patent urachus (n=2), urachal diverticulum (n=1), and neuroblastoma (n=1) in the rest. Patients with umbilical discharge presented significantly younger than patients with abdominal pain or incidentally recognized patients (2.4±1.2, 7.2±1.17, and 10.9±3.1 years, respectively; p

🔖

Cite This Article

Yağız, B. (2022). Urachal Remnants and Anomalies in Children: Rationales of Surgery. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 63–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/568585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Buddha S, Menias CO, Katabathina VS. Imaging of urachal anomalies. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44:3978-3989
  2. Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC. Current diagnosis and management of urachal remnants. J Pediatr Surg 2013;48:2148-2152
  3. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, Rohlinger AL, Husmann DA, Kramer SA. Urachal anomalies: a longitudinal study of urachal remnants in children and adults. J Urol 2007;178:1615-1618
  4. Lipskar AM, Glick RD, Rosen NG, Layliev J, Hong AR, Dolgin SE, Soffer SZ. Nonoperative management of symptomatic urachal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1016-1019
  5. Ueno T, Hashimoto H, Yokoyama H, Ito M, Kouda K, Kanamaru H. Urachal anomalies: ultrasonography and management. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1203- 1207
  6. Pazos HM, Costa WS, Sampaio FJ, Favorito LA. Structural and ontogenetic study of the urachus in human fetuses. Cells Tissues Organs 2010;191:422- 430
  7. Gleason JM, Bowlin PR, Bagli DJ, Lorenzo AJ, Hassouna T, Koyle MA, Farhat WA. A comprehensive review of pediatric urachal anomalies and predictive analysis for adult urachal adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2015;193:632-636
  8. Parada Villavicencio C, Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Miller FH. Imaging of the Urachus: Anomalies, Complications, and Mimics. Radiographics 2016;36:2049-2063
  9. Ozbek SS, Pourbagher MA, Pourbagher A. Urachal remnants in asymptomatic children: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2001;29:218-222
  10. Cacciarelli AA, Kass EJ, Yang SS. Urachal remnants: sonographic demonstration in children. Radiology 1990;174:473-475
  11. Dethlefs CR, Abdessalam SF, Raynor SC, Perry DA, Allbery SM, Lyden ER, Azarow KS, Cusick RA. Conservative management of urachal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 2019;54:1054-1058
  12. Boothroyd AE, Cudmore RE. Ultrasound of the discharging umbilicus. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:362-364
  13. Nagasaki A, Handa N, Kawanami T. Diagnosis of urachal anomalies in infancy and childhood by contrast fistulography, ultrasound and CT. Pediatr Radiol 1991;21:321-323
  14. Zieger B, Sokol B, Rohrschneider WK, Darge K, Tröger J. Sonomorphology and involution of the normal urachus in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:156-161
  15. D’Alessio A, Verdelli G, Bernardi M, DePascale S, Chiarenza SF, Giardina C, Cheli M, Rota G, Locatelli G. Endodermal sinus (yolk sac) tumor of the urachus. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:180-181
  16. Rich RH, Hardy BE, Filler RM. Surgery for anomalies of the urachus. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:370-372
  17. Clapu