SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Effects of Creating Simulations in Interactive Physics Application and Developing Portfolio on Students' Academic Self-Concept and Creativity

Ahmet Feyzi SATICI
Engin KATIRCI
Pages
60–66
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Instead of drill-and-practice applications,providing learners with computers applications which implement constructivist learningstrategies such as discovery learning (Akpınar, 2003; Biber, 2006), project based learning(Demirel et al., 2001; Yılmaz, 2006), and problem based learning (Yaman & Yalçın, 2005)supports and nurtures their creativity.Simulations, as a form of computer-supported instruction, facilitate problem-solvingactivities and represent a controlled depiction of real world situations (Bayram, 1999).According to Yaman and Yalçın (2005), creative people are good at problem solving

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Creative thinking is defined by Özözer (2004) as finding and establishing newconnections in existing connections, building new concepts, generating a unique idea,developing an original product, or proposing a new solution to existing problems by creating anew mental schema.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using computers in thismanner allows us to support meaningful learning and knowledge construction (Jonassen, Carr,& Yueh, 1998).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Instead of drill-and-practice applications,providing learners with computers applications which implement constructivist learningstrategies such as discovery learning (Akpınar, 2003; Biber, 2006), project based learning(Demirel et al., 2001; Yılmaz, 2006), and problem based learning (Yaman & Yalçın, 2005)supports and nurtures their creativity.Simulations, as a form of computer-supported instruction, facilitate problem-solvingactivities and represent a controlled depiction of real world situations (Bayram, 1999).According to Yaman and Yalçın (2005), creative people are good at problem solving
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Creative thinking is defined by Özözer (2004) as finding and establishing newconnections in existing connections, building new concepts, generating a unique idea,developing an original product, or proposing a new solution to existing problems by creating anew mental schema. This definition stresses the role of cognition in creativity. Computersmight support cognitive dimension of creativity. Computers can be used to reflect whatstudents know; therefore, they act as “cognitive amplification tools”. Using computers in thismanner allows us to support meaningful learning and knowledge construction (Jonassen, Carr,& Yueh, 1998). According to Clements (1995), computers might become “potent catalysts toimprove creativeness.”To support creativity, not only using computers in educational environments, but, moreimportantly, also how it is used is important. Instead of drill-and-practice applications,providing learners with computers applications which implement constructivist learningstrategies such as discovery learning (Akpınar, 2003; Biber, 2006), project based learning(Demirel et al., 2001; Yılmaz, 2006), and problem based learning (Yaman & Yalçın, 2005)supports and nurtures their creativity.Simulations, as a form of computer-supported instruction, facilitate problem-solvingactivities and represent a controlled depiction of real world situations (Bayram, 1999).According to Yaman and Yalçın (2005), creative people are good at problem solving

🔖

Cite This Article

SATICI, A. F., KATIRCI, E. (2022). Effects of Creating Simulations in Interactive Physics Application and Developing Portfolio on Students' Academic Self-Concept and Creativity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 60–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/568523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akpınar, E. ( 2003). Buluş Stratejisiyle Enerji İlişkili Fen Öğretimi: Canlılar İçin Madde ve Enerji Ünitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. & G. R. Foxall (1995). Construct Validity and Generalizability of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 9(3), 185-206.
  3. Barrett, H. C. (2000). Create Your Own Electronic Portfolio: Using Off-the-Shelf Software to Showcase Your Own or Student Work. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(7), 14-21.
  4. Bayram, S. (1999). Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretim Teknolojileri. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.
  5. Bekiroğlu, F.O. (2004). Ne Kadar Başarılı: Klasik ve Alternatif Ölçme-Değerlendirme Yöntemleri ve Fizikte Uygulamalar, Ankara:
  6. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Biber, M. (2006). Keşfederek Öğrenme Yönteminin İlköğretim II. Kademe Matematik Dersi Öğrencilerinin Yaratıcılıkları Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  7. Brooks, G. D. (2006). The Effects on Self–Regulation in Adult Learners after Completion of a Professional Assessment and Development College Course. Doktora tezi, George Mason University, Virginia. Clements, D. H. (1995).
  8. Teaching Creativity with Computers, Educational Psychology Review, 7(2),141–161.
  9. Demirel, Ö., Başbay, A., Uyangör, N., & Bıyıklı, C. (2001, 7-9 Haziran 2001). Proje Tabanlı Öğrenme Modelinin Öğrenme Sürecine ve Öğrenci Tutumlarına Etkisi. 10. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri, Bolu. Güleryüz, H. (2001). Eğitim Programlarının Dili ve Yaratıcı Öğrenme. Ankara:
  10. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Hung, S-T. A. (2006). Alternative EFL Assessment: Integrating Electronic Portfolios into the Classroom. Doktora Tezi. Indiana University, Indiana. Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C.& Yueh, H.P. (1998). Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. Tech Trends: For Leaders in Education & Training, 43(2), 24-32.
  11. Kazan, Z. (2006). Elektronik Gelişim Dosyasının Eğitim Amaçlı Tasarlanması ve Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Dersinde Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  12. Özözer, Y. (2004). Ne Parlak Fikir! Yaratıcı Düşünme Yöntemleri. İstanbul:
  13. Sistem Yayıncılık Özyenginer, E. (2006). Bilgisayar Dersinde Elektronik Portfolyo Yöntem Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  14. Piyancı, B