SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: özel sayı

Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL) in Science Education to Improve Students’ Scientific Creativity in Covid-19 Pandemic

Fida RACHMADIARTI
Arıf SHOLAHUDDIN
Saiyidah MAHTARI
SUYIDNO
Joko SISWANTO
Nadi SUPRAPTO
Binar Kurnia PRAHANI
Pages
77–90
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The OSCL can be a learning innovation in science education to improve students’ scientific creativity in the Covid-19 pandemic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Wademen Model was chosen to develop the Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The OSCL has been proven effective in increasing students' scientific creativity during the Covid-19 pandemic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The OSCL can be a learning innovation in science education to improve students’ scientific creativity in the Covid-19 pandemic.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Wademen Model was chosen to develop the Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL). The quality of OSCL is measured using an expert validation sheet. Students' scientific creativity is assessed using the Scientific Creativity Test Instrument (SCTI) and then analyzed through N-gain and parametric inferential statistical tests. The OSCL has been proven effective in increasing students' scientific creativity during the Covid-19 pandemic. There is no significant difference (N-gain at a moderate level) between OSCL and Creativity Responsibility Based Learning (CRBL), except with Conventional Learning (N-gain at low level). The results of students' scientific creativity are at a high level after using OSCL and CRBL, while conventional learning is low. The OSCL can be an alternative for the scientific creativity of students in science education. Besides, OSCL facilitates the responsibility and science process skills which are characteristic of being emphasized in the learning phases. The OSCL can be a learning innovation in science education to improve students’ scientific creativity in the Covid-19 pandemic.

🔖

Cite This Article

RACHMADIARTI, F., SHOLAHUDDIN, A., MAHTARI, S., SUYIDNO, S., SISWANTO, J., SUPRAPTO, N., PRAHANI, B. K. (2022). Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL) in Science Education to Improve Students’ Scientific Creativity in Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: özel sayı, 77–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/568443

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian education and ıts relation to the philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar”. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9
  2. Al-khatib, B.A. (2012). The effect of using brainstorming strategy in developing creative problem solving skills among female students in princess alia university college. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(10), 29-38. Available from:https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1059.1348&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  3. Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill. Astutik, S., Susantini, E., Madlazim, Mohamad, N., & Supeno. (2020). The effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning models (CCL) on secondary schools scientific creativity skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13336a
  4. Ayas, M. B. & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195– 205.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
  5. Blascova, M. (2014). Influencing academic motivation, responsibility and creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 415-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.399
  6. Chin, M. K. & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a figural scientific creativity test for preschool pupils. Creative Education, 6(1), 1391-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.612139
  7. Cocu, A., Pecheanu, E., & Susnea, I. (2015). Stimulating creativity through collaboration in an innovation laboratory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 173 - 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.753
  8. Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467- 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302
  9. Dhir, T. (2014). Problem solving ability and science process skills as the influential factors of scientific creativity. International Journal of Research Pedagogy and Technology in Education Movement Sciences, 2(4), 11-17.
  10. Didin, W. & Wiji, L.Z. (2020). The implementation of project-based learning approach in students’ creativity programs in Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 702-708. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8375
  11. Dwikoranto, Munasir, Setiani, R., S