Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of saline infusion sonohysterography and hyterscopy findings in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

Anormal uterus kanamalarında salin infüzyon sonohisterografi ve histeroskopi bulgularının karşılaştırılması

Pages
30–34
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In comparison with hysteroscopy, sonohysterography is a cheaper and easier procedure for detecting endometrial pathologies such as endometrial polyps and submucous myomas with its highly diagnostic value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To establish the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosing uterine pathology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 39 women with abnormal uterine bleeding were recruited for the study and underwent transvaginal ultrasonography followed by saline infusion sonohysterography.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In comparison with hysteroscopy, sonohysterography is a cheaper and easier procedure for detecting endometrial pathologies such as endometrial polyps and submucous myomas with its highly diagnostic value.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To establish the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosing uterine pathology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Materials and Methods: A total of 39 women with abnormal uterine bleeding were recruited for the study and underwent transvaginal ultrasonography followed by saline infusion sonohysterography. During hysteroscopy, resection of the focal intracavitary lesion was performed. Endometrial sampling was obtained from all patients. Results: Sonohysterographic and hysteroscopic evaluation revealed 25 and 24 endometrial polyps, 7 each submucous myomas, 3 and 1 endometrial hyperplasia, 1 each synechia, and 3 and 6 normal findings, respectively. Comparison of histopathologic findings with other diagnostic tests revealed that hysteroscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 72%, positive predictive value of 94%, negative predictive value of 83% and total sensitivity of 92%. Sonohysterography showed sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 29%, positive predictive value of 86%, negative predictive value of 85% and total sensitivity of 85%. Conclusion: In comparison with hysteroscopy, sonohysterography is a cheaper and easier procedure for detecting endometrial pathologies such as endometrial polyps and submucous myomas with its highly diagnostic value.

Özet

Amaç: Anormal uterus kanaması olan kadınlarda şalin infüzyon sonohisterografi ve histeroskopinin uterin kavite patolojilerindeki tanısal rolünü belirlemek. Materyal ve Metot: Anormal uterus kanaması olan 39 hasta incelendi. Transvaginal sonografi sonrası şalin infüzyon sonohisterografi yapıldı. Histeroskopi sırasında fokal lezyonu olanlara rezeksiyon yapıldı. Bütün hastalara endometrial örnekleme yapıldı. Sonuçlar: Sonohisterografi ile histeroskopi karşılaştırıldığında, endometrial polip (sırasıyla 25 ve 24 vaka), submuköz myom (7'şer vaka), hiperplazi (sırasıyla 3 ve 1 vaka), intrauterin yapışıklık (1'er vaka) ve normal olarak (sırasıyla 3 ve 6 vaka) değerlendirildi. Hiştopatolojik değerlendirme standart kabul edildiğinde, histeroskopi ile uterin lezyonların tanısında sensitivite %97, spesifisite %72, pozitif prediktif değer %94, negatif prediktif değer %83 ve toplam duyarlılık %92 bulundu. Sonohisterografide sensitivite %97, spesifisite %29, pozitif prediktif değer %86, negatif prediktif değer %85 ve toplam duyarlılık %85 bulundu. Tartışma: Endometrial polip ve submuköz myom gibi benign uterin patolojilerde, yüksek tanısal değer ile sonohisterografi, histeroskopiye kıyasla daha ucuz ve daha kolay bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, İ., DEMİRCİ, F., YÜCEL, O., ALHAN, A., BAHÇEBAŞI, T., SOMUNKIRAN, A. (2022). Comparison of saline infusion sonohysterography and hyterscopy findings in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 30–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/568029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Goldstein SR. Use of ultrasonohysterography for triage of perimenopausal patients with unexplained uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170:565-70
  2. Emanuel MH, Verdel MJC, Stas H. An audit of true prevalence of intrauterine pathology: the hysteroscopical findings controlled for patient selection in 1202 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Gynaecol Endosc. 1995; 4:237-41
  3. Clevenger-Hoeft M, Syrop CH, Stovall DW, Van Voorhis BJ. Sonohysterography in premenopausal women with and without abnormal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:516-20
  4. Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:87-95
  5. Tüfekçi EC, Girit S, Bayırlı E, Durmuşoğlu F, Yalti S. Evaluation of tubal patency by transvaginal sonosalpingography. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:336-40
  6. Goldberg JM, Falcone T, Attaran M. Sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine abnormalities noted on hysterosalpingography. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2151-3
  7. Cullinan JA, Fleischer AC, Kepple DM, Arnold AL. Sonohysterography: a technique for endometrial evaluation. Radiographics. 1995;15:501-14
  8. Bağış T, Kılıçdağ EB, Tarım E, Çetintaş S. Endometrial patolojilerin saptanmasında salin sonohisterografinin yeri. Türkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik Dergisi. 2003;13:36-40
  9. Karatepe F, Abalı R, Bozkurt S, Arıkan İ, Şahin AE. Anormal uterin kanamalarI n değerlendirilmesinde sonohisterografinin yeri. Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Dergisi. 2004;18:44-9
  10. Yenen MC, Dede M, Göktolga Ü, Ercan M, Başer İ, Pabuccu R. Menometrorajik olgularda sonohisterografi ve ofis histeroskopinin yeri. Medikal Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor. 2003;9:491-5
  11. Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Serra V, Sampaio M, Pellicer A. An assessment of hysterosalpingosonography (HSSG) as a diagnostic tool for uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992;20:175-81
  12. Dueholm M, Forman A, Jensen ML, Laursen H, Kracht P. Transvaginal sonography combined with saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluating the uterine cavity in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:54-61
  13. Lalchandani S, Phillips K. Evaluation of endometrial cavity—investigation options Reviews in Gynaecological Practice. 2003;3:165-70
  14. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnost