Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Endemik bir bölgede spontan abortus yapan kadınlarda brusella enfeksiyonunun rolü

The role of brucella infection among women with spontaneous abortion in an endemic region

Pages
20–23
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In both groups IgM was negative (IgM

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Brucella infection in animals is associated with high incidence of abortion but in human, there are controversies about role of brucellosis in spontaneous abortion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials & METHODS: In this study 81 women with spontaneous abortion were considered as case and 105 women with normal pregnancy outcome as a control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In both groups IgM was negative (IgM
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brucella infection in animals is associated with high incidence of abortion but in human, there are controversies about role of brucellosis in spontaneous abortion. Brucellosis is endemic in Iran. Because many causes of abortion are undiagnosed, this study has been designed for the evaluation of a possible association between the previous maternal brucella infection and spontaneous abortion. Materials & METHODS: In this study 81 women with spontaneous abortion were considered as case and 105 women with normal pregnancy outcome as a control group. IgG and IgM antibody was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in both groups. IgG or IgM equal or greater than ten considered positive.RESULTS: Both groups were matched based on age, number of previous pregnancies and abortion, gestational age and consumption of unpasteurized cheese. 6.2% of cases and 13.6% of control group had positive IgG titer (IgG ≥ 10). In both groups IgM was negative (IgM

Özet

Amaç: Hayvanlardaki brusella enfeksiyonu yüksek oranda abortus insidansı ile ilişkilidir, ancak insanlarda spontan abortuslardaki rolü tartışmalıdır. Brusellozis İran’da endemiktir. Çoğu abortus nedeni tanımlanamadığından, bu çalışma, önceden geçirilmiş brusella enfeksiyonu ve spontan abortus arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için tasarlanmıştır. Materyal ve Metot: Bu çalışmada, 81 spontan abortusu olan kadın, olgu grubu olarak; normal gebeliği olan 105 kadın da kontrol grubu olarak belirlendi. Her iki grupta brusella, IgG ve IgM antikorlara enzim-bağlı immünsorban metodu ile bakıldı. IgG ya da IgM seviyeleri 10 ve üzeri olanlar pozitif kabul edildi. Bulgular: Her iki grup yaş, önceki gebelik sayısı, abortus sayısı, gestasyonel yaş ve pastörize edilmemiş süt tüketimi açısından değerlendirildi. Olguların %6.2’sinde ve kontrollerin %13.6’sında pozitif IgG titresi (IgG ³10) izlendi. Her iki grupta IgM negatif (

🔖

Cite This Article

NASSAJI, M., GHORBANI, R., LAVAF, S., RAHBAR, N. (2022). Endemik bir bölgede spontan abortus yapan kadınlarda brusella enfeksiyonunun rolü. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 20–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/567889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Gotuzzo E, Carrilo C. Brucella. In: Gorbach SL, Bartelett JG, Blacklow NR, editors. Infectious Diseases, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1998. p. 1837-43
  2. Boschiroli ML, Foulongne V, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis: A worldwide zoonosis. Curr Opin Microbiol 2001;4:58-64
  3. Pabahi M, Brucellosis. In: Azizi F, Janghorbani M, Hatami H, eds. Epidemiology and Control of Common Disorders in Iran, 2nd ed. Tehran; Eshtiagh publication; 2000. p. 533-41
  4. Salata RA, Brucellosis. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 22th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 1887-90
  5. Young EJ. Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 2669-72
  6. Seoud M, Saade G, Uwaydah M. Brucellosis in pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1991;36:441-5
  7. Osoba AO, Balkhy H, Memish Z et al. Diagnostic Value of Brucella ELISA IgG and IgM in Bacteremic and Non-Bacteremic Patients with Brucellosis. J Chemother 2001;13 Suppl 1:4-9
  8. Fadeel MA, Wasfy MO, Pimentel G et al. Rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of human brucellosis in surveillance and clinical settings in Egypt. Saudi Med J 2006 Jul;27:975-81
  9. Griebel CP, Halvorsen J, Golemon TB et al. Management of spontaneous abortion. Am Fam Physician 2005 Oct;72:1243-50
  10. Cunningham GF, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL et al. Williams Obstetrics, 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005;231-51
  11. Schut DJ, Joseph H. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in: Berek JS, ed. Novak’s Gynecology, 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002:1073-5
  12. Khan MY, Mab MW, Memish ZA. Brucellosis in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1172-7
  13. Makhseed M, Harouny A, Araj G. Obstetric and Gynecologic implication of brucellosis in Kuwait. J Perinatol 1998;18(3):196-6
  14. Panjarathinam R. Anti-Brucella agglutinins in aborted women. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1984;13(4):433-6
  15. Sharif A, Reyes Z, Thomassen P. Screening for brucellosis in pregnant women. J Trop Med Hyg 1990;93(1):42-30
  16. Fernihough TJ, Munoz WP, Mahadeyo I. The role of Brucella abortus in Spontaneous abortion among the black population. S Afr Med J 1985;68(5):379-80.