Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Maternal diabetes mellitusun eşlik etmediği kaudal regresyon sendromunun prenatal tanısı

Prenatal diagnosis of caudal regression syndrome without maternal diabetes mellitus

Pages
186–188
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So clinicians should consider CRS when CRL is shorter than expected and incomplete vertebral ossification is observed both in gray scala and 3D imaging ultrasonography. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 186-8)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Caudal regression syndrome is a rare congenital malformation with varying degrees of early gestational developmental failure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cause of this malformation is thought to be defects in neuralization around the 28th day of the gestational period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So clinicians should consider CRS when CRL is shorter than expected and incomplete vertebral ossification is observed both in gray scala and 3D imaging ultrasonography. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 186-8)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Caudal regression syndrome is a rare congenital malformation with varying degrees of early gestational developmental failure. It is also known as sacral agenesis or caudal dysplasia. The cause of this malformation is thought to be defects in neuralization around the 28th day of the gestational period. Although maternal uncontrolled diabetes, genetic predisposition and vascular hypoperfusion are the possible risk factors, actual pathogenesis is unclear. CRS is generally diagnosed at prenatal assessment, but also a varying number of newborns with some degree of anomaly may be presented. In our case, we diagnosed a caudal regression syndrome fetus early in the second trimester. Determination of the pathology early in the gestational age gives parents a chance for termination of pregnancy. Although diabetes mellitus is the major risk factor for CRS, as in our case, sporadic presentations may occur. So clinicians should consider CRS when CRL is shorter than expected and incomplete vertebral ossification is observed both in gray scala and 3D imaging ultrasonography. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 186-8)

Özet

Kaudal regresyon sendromu (KRS) çeşitli derecelerde erken gestasyonel gelişim bozukluğunun gözlendiği nadir bir konjenital anomalidir. Bu durum sakral agensesis ya da kaudal displazi olarak da bilinmektedir. Gebeliğin 28. günü civarında oluşabilecek nöralizasyon defekti bu malformasyonun nedeni olarak düşünülmektedir. Maternal kontrolsüz diabet, genetik yatkınlık ve vasküler hipoperfüzyon olası risk faktörleri olmasına rağmen, gerçek patogenezis belirsizdir. KRS tanısı genellikle prenatal olarak koyulur, ancak yine de değişen sayıda yeni doğan çeşitli derecelerde anomalilerle tanı alabilirler. Sunulan kaudal regresyon sendromlu fetüs olgusuna erken ikinci trimesterde tanı koyduk. Patolojinin erken gebelik haftalarında belirlenmesi ile aile gebelik terminasyonu şansına sahip olabilir. Diabetes mellitus, KRS için majör faktörü olmasına karşın, bizim olgumuzda olduğu gibi spoaradik durumlar da sözkonusu olabilir. Böylece, klinisyenler beklenenden kısa CRL ile karşılaştıklarında ve hem gri skala hem de 3D ultrasonografide tamamlanmamış vertebral ossifikasyon görünümü saptadıklarında kaudal regresyon sendromunu düşünmelidir. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 186-8)

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞOL, S., YENİEL, A. Ö., ERGENOĞLU, A. M. (2022). Maternal diabetes mellitusun eşlik etmediği kaudal regresyon sendromunun prenatal tanısı. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 186–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/567712

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Sadler TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004; 60-110
  2. Stroustroup-Smith A, Grable I, Levine D. Case 66: caudal regression syndrome in the fetus of a diabetic mother. Radiology. 2004; 230: 229-33
  3. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 4th ed. New York, NY. Churchill Livingstone; 2002; 1090-1
  4. Cullier F, Charpentier AS, M’Lamali H, Colbert R. Jarcho-Levin syndrome with caudal regression. http://www.thefetus.net. Accessed December 2005; 15 5. Aslan H, Yanik H, Celikaslan N, Yildirim G, Ceylan Y. Prenatal diagnosis of caudal regression syndrome: a case report. BMJ Pregnancy Childbirth. 2001; 1: 8. [CrossRef] 6. Wender-Ozegowska E, Wroblewska K, Zawiejska A, Pietryga M, Szczapa J, Biczysko R. Threshold values of maternal blood glucose in early diabetic pregnancy-prediction of fetal malformations. Acta Obsteitricia et Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84: 17-25. [CrossRef] 7. Zaw W, Stone DG. Caudal regression syndrome in twin pregnancy with type II diabetes. J Perinatol 2002; 22: 171-4. [CrossRef] 8. Twining P, McHugo J, Pilling D. Textbook of fetal abnormalities. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 158-60
  5. Ogata ES. Carbohydrate homeostasis. In: MacDonald MR, Seshia MM, Mullett MD, eds. Avery’s Neonatology, Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005; 876-91
  6. Padmanabhan P. Retinoic acid-induced caudal regression syndrome in the mouse fetus. Reproductive Toxicoloygy 1998; 12: 139-51. [CrossRef] 11. Tse HK, Leung MB, Woolf AS, Menke AL, Hastie ND, Gosling JA, et al. Implication of Wt1 in the Pathogenesis of Nephrogenic Failure in a Mouse Model of Retinoic Acid-Induced Caudal Regression Syndrome.Am J Pathol. 2005; 166: 1295-307. [CrossRef] 12. Singh SK, Singh RD, Sharma A. Caudal regression-case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004; 21: 578-81
  7. Twickler D, Budorick N, Pretorius D, Grafe M, Currarino G. Caudal regression versus sirenomelia: sonographic clues. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12: 323-30.