Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Vajinal histerektomi sonrası hangi parametreler hastanede kalım süresini etkiler?

Which parameters may influence the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy?

Pages
15–18
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increased experience, careful surgical technique and adherence to aseptic principles may improve the cost-effectivity and decrease the duration of hospitalization. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14: 15-8)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To estimate the variables that may affect the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: An 11-year retrospective analysis was per- formed on data derived from 197 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy due to non-malignant pathology at a tertiary care center between January 2000 to November 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increased experience, careful surgical technique and adherence to aseptic principles may improve the cost-effectivity and decrease the duration of hospitalization. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14: 15-8)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the variables that may affect the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: An 11-year retrospective analysis was per- formed on data derived from 197 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy due to non-malignant pathology at a tertiary care center between January 2000 to November 2011. Results: The average age of the patients in our series was 60.9±11.1 with a duration of hospitalization of 11.6±6.1 days after vaginal hys- terectomy. The grouping variables consisted of age, number of preg- nancies, abortions, parities and the presence of intra or postoperative complications. Advanced age (>60), increased number of pregnan- cies (>5) and parities (>5) and occurrence of intra or postopera- tive complications were found to be correlated with the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy. Categorical variables were analyzed by Pearson s chi square or the Fisher exact test. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare groups, while the correlation of variables was assessed with the Spearman Correlation Analysis. Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and effective procedure. Advanced age, increased number of pregnancies and parities and oc- currence of intra or postoperative complications may prolong the du- ration of hospitalization after surgery. Increased experience, careful surgical technique and adherence to aseptic principles may improve the cost-effectivity and decrease the duration of hospitalization. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14: 15-8)

Özet

Amaç: Vajinal histerektomi sonrası hastanede kalım süresini etkileye- bilecek değişkenleri değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu 11 yıllık retrospektif çalışma Ocak 2000 ile Kasım 2011 yılları arasında tersiyer bir merkezde malign olmayan nedenlerle vajinal histerektomi gerçekleştirilmiş 197 hastanın bilgileri kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Hastalarımızın ortalama yaşı 60.9±11.1 yıl ve vajinal histe- rektomi sonrası hastanede kalım süresi 11.6±6.1 gündü. Gruplandır- madaki değişkenlerimiz yaş, gebelik sayısı, abort sayısı, doğum sayısı ve operasyon sırası veya sonrasında ortaya çıkan komplikasyonları içermekteydi. İleri yaş (>60), artmış gebelik (>5) ve doğum (>5) sayısı, operasyon sırası veya sonrasında ortaya çıkan komplikasyon- ların vajinal histerektomi sonrası hastanede kalım süresi ile ilişkili olduğu bulundu. Kategorik değişkenler Pearson Ki Kare testi veya Fisher exact testi ile analiz edildi. Grupların karşılaştırılmasında Mann Whitney U testi, değişkenlerin korelasyonunda Spearman korelasyon analizi kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: Vajinal histerektomi güvenilir ve etkili bir yöntemdir. İle- ri yaş, gebelik sayısı ve doğum sayısının fazla olması, operasyon es- nasında ve sonrasında ortaya çıkan komplikasyonlar cerrahi sonrası hastanede kalım süresini uzatabilir. Artmış cerrahi deneyim, özenli bir cerrahi teknik ve asepsi kurallarına uymak fiyat-etkinliği arttırabilir ve hastanede kalım süresini azaltabilir. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14: 15-8)

🔖

Cite This Article

EVSEN, M. S., TURGUT, A., ENDER, H. S., BAŞARANOĞLU, S., YALINKAYA, A. (2022). Vajinal histerektomi sonrası hangi parametreler hastanede kalım süresini etkiler?. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 15–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/567618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nüssler E, Löfgren M. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdomi- nal supravaginal hysterectomy-a preliminary study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 682-7. [CrossRef] Egh MA, Otterlind L, Stjerndahl JH, Löfgren M. Hysterectomy and incon- tinence: a study from the Swedish National Register for Gynecologic Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 614-8. [CrossRef] Akyol D, Esinler I, Guven S, Salman MC, Ayhan A. Vaginal hysterec- tomy: Results and complications of 886 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 26: 777-81. [CrossRef] Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, et al. 1982. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 841-8.
  2. Rafii A, Samain E, Levardon M, Darai E, Deval B. Vaginal hysterec- tomy for benign disorders in obese women: a prospective study. BJOG 2005; 111: 223-7. [CrossRef] Pakbaz M, Mogren I, Löfgren M. Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care. BMC Women’s Health 2009; 9: 9. [CrossRef] Miskry T, Magos A. Randomized, prospective, double-blind com- parison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women with- out uterovaginal prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 351-8. [CrossRef] Al-Fozan H, Dufort J, Kaplow M, Valenti D, Tulandi T. Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1401-4. [CrossRef] Van Den Eeden SK, Glasser M, Mathias SD, Colwell HH, Pasta DJ, Kunz K. Quality of life, health care utilization, and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 91-100. [CrossRef]