Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section

Pages
245–249
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Presence of BMI >25 kg/m2, gestation ≥40 weeks, and vertex sta- tion ≥-2 were risk factors for unsuccessful TOLAC. (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To detect the maternal and obstetrical factors associated with successful trial of vaginal birth among women with a previous cesar- ean delivery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 122 women who were eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) according to departmental protocol were included in this comparative prospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Presence of BMI >25 kg/m2, gestation ≥40 weeks, and vertex sta- tion ≥-2 were risk factors for unsuccessful TOLAC. (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To detect the maternal and obstetrical factors associated with successful trial of vaginal birth among women with a previous cesar- ean delivery. Material and Methods: A total of 122 women who were eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) according to departmental protocol were included in this comparative prospective study. After informed consent, the women included in this study were subjected to a thorough history to detect maternal and obstetric characteristics and a standard examination to estimate fetal weight, engagement of the fetal head, intra-partum features of fetal membranes, and cervical dilatation. After delivery, data on duration of labor, labor augmentation, mode of delivery, birth outcome, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission were recorded and analyzed. Results: Trial of labor after cesarean section was successful in 72.13% and was unsuccessful in 27.87%. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the successful TOLAC group compared to the unsuccessful group (23.8±0.03 versus 26.2±0.02 kg/m2), and the number of women with BMI >25 kg/m2 was significantly high in the unsuccessful group; also, mean gestational age was significantly lower in the successful TOLAC group compared to the unsuccessful group (37.5±0.04 versus 38.5±0.03 weeks), and the number of women admitted in labor with gestation ≥40 weeks was significantly high in the unsuccessful group. The number of women admitted with >2/5 of fetal head palpable abdominally and fetal head station ≥-2 was significantly high in the unsuccessful TOLAC group. Conclusion: In carefully selected cases, TOLAC is safe and often successful. Presence of BMI >25 kg/m2, gestation ≥40 weeks, and vertex sta- tion ≥-2 were risk factors for unsuccessful TOLAC. (

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDELAZİM, I. A., ELBİAA, A. A. M., AL-KADİ, M., YEHİA, A. H., NUSAİR, B. M. S., FAZA, M. A. (2022). Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 245–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/567593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Gordon GC. Delivery after Cesarean Section. In: Studd J, Tan SL, Chervenak FA, editors. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Edenburgh: Elsevier; 2006. p. 245-63
  2. Paré E, Quiñones JN, Macones GA. Vaginal birth after cesarean sec- tion versus elective repeat cesarean section: Assessment of mater- nal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 2006; 113:75-85. [CrossRef] 3. Betran AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying cesarean sections. Reprod Health 2009; 6: 18. [CrossRef] 4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Birth after previous caesarean birth. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2007 Feb. 17 p. (Green- top guideline; no. 45). Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/ guidelines
  3. Rossi AC, D’Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a sys- tematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 224-31. [CrossRef] 6. Ball E, Hinshaw K. The current management of vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. The Obstetrian & Gynaecologist 2007; 9: 77-82. [CrossRef] 7. Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Ratcliffe SJ, Stevens EJ, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1143-7. [CrossRef] 8. Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, Aggarwal R, Trivedi SS. Trial of labour after previous cesarean section: The predictive factors affecting outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31: 224-8. [CrossRef] 9. Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall N, Emeis C, Fu R, Janik R, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 967-81. [CrossRef] 10. Tan PC, Subramaniam RN, Omar SZ. Trial of labor after one cesar- ean: role of the order and number of prior vaginal births on the risk of emergency cesarean delivery and neonatal admission. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 47: 305-11. [CrossRef] 11. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the suc- cess of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1016-23. [CrossRef] 12. Balachandran L, Vaswani PR, Mogotlane R. Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 99-102