Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Antenatal diagnosis and outcome of agenesis of corpus callosum: A retrospective review of 33 cases

Pages
18–21
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The diagnosis of congenital brain malformation is a challenging issue, since additional findings have a considerable effect on prog- nosis; detailed examination with genetic counselling should be performed. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2014; 15: 18-21)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To present antenatal sonographic findings and postnatal outcome of a population of foetuses diagnosed with agenesis of corpus callosum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The database of our ultrasound laboratory was retrospectively searched for cases of agenesis of the corpus callosum suspected at antenatal sonography between 2002 and 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The diagnosis of congenital brain malformation is a challenging issue, since additional findings have a considerable effect on prog- nosis; detailed examination with genetic counselling should be performed. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2014; 15: 18-21)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To present antenatal sonographic findings and postnatal outcome of a population of foetuses diagnosed with agenesis of corpus callosum. Material and Methods: The database of our ultrasound laboratory was retrospectively searched for cases of agenesis of the corpus callosum suspected at antenatal sonography between 2002 and 2012. The following variables were assessed: maternal age, gestational age at diagnosis, gender, any additional cerebral and extra-cerebral malformations, results of karyotype analysis and pregnancy and foetal/neonatal outcomes. Results: During the study period, 33 foetuses with agenesis of the corpus callosum were identified antenatally, with a male preponderance. The mean maternal age was 28.48 years. In all cases, pre/postnatal MRI and/or necropsy were performed in order to confirm the diagnosis. Among those, there were additional brain findings in 23 (69.7%) and additional extra-cerebral anomalies in 3 (9.1%) foetuses. Karyotype analysis was performed in 21 of 33 (63.6%) cases. As for pregnancy outcome, the pregnancy was terminated in 14 (42.4%) of the remaining 19 foetuses; eighteen (54.5%) were delivered near term and one (3.1%) who was delivered prematurely died during the neonatal period. Conclusion: The diagnosis of congenital brain malformation is a challenging issue, since additional findings have a considerable effect on prog- nosis; detailed examination with genetic counselling should be performed. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2014; 15: 18-21)

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYÜNCÜ, Ö., YAZICIOĞLU, A., TURĞAL, M. (2022). Antenatal diagnosis and outcome of agenesis of corpus callosum: A retrospective review of 33 cases. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 18–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/567564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Vasudevan C, McKechnie L, Levene M. Long-termoutcome of antenatally diagnosed agenesis of corpus callosum and cerebellar malformations. Semin Fetal Neonatal 2012; 17: 295-300. [CrossRef] Volpe P Paladini D, Resta M, Stanziano A, Salvatore M, Quarantelli M, et al. Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agen- esis of the corpus callosum in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 509-16. [CrossRef] Comstock CH, Culp D, Gonzalez J, Boal DB. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus: its evolution and significance. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 613-6.
  2. Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diag- nosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 337.1-5
  3. Pilu G, Sandri F, Perolo A, Pittalis MC, Grisolia G, Cocchi G, et al. Sonography of fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum: a survey of 35 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 318-29. [CrossRef] Mangione R, Fries N, Godard P Capron C, Mirlesse V, Lacombe D, Duyme M. Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diag- nosis of an isolated anomaly of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 37: 290-5. [CrossRef] Bedeschi MF, Bonaglia MC, Grasso R, Pellegri A, Garghentino RR, Battaglia MA, et al. Agenesis of corpus callosum: clinical and genetic study in 63 young patients. Pediatr Neurol 2006; 34: 186-93. [CrossRef] Santo S, D’Antonio F, Homfray T, Rich P, Pilu G, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou AT. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 513-21. [CrossRef] Moutard ML, Kieffer V, Feingold J, Kieffer F, Lewin F, Adamsbaum C, et al. Agenesis of corpus callosum: prenatal diagnosis and prog- nosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19: 471-6. [CrossRef]