Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Determination of risk factors and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies complicated by isolated single umbilical artery in Turkish population

Pages
21–24
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the adjustment of confounding factors, odds ratios (ORs)and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: The incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was found to be significantly higherin cases with an isolated single umbilical artery (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To address the possible risk factors, eventual pregnancy outcomes, and probable troubles in follow-ups of pregnancies complicatedby an isolated single umbilical artery and to provide data on Turkish cases in such an aspect that ethnic divergences may have influence.Material and Methods: A total of 16568 singleton pregnancies that were delivered between May 2006 and May 2013 were retrospective -ly screened.
📊
Key Findings & Data:IBM SPSS Statis -tics 20.0 software was utilized for statistical analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the adjustment of confounding factors, odds ratios (ORs)and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: The incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was found to be significantly higherin cases with an isolated single umbilical artery (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To address the possible risk factors, eventual pregnancy outcomes, and probable troubles in follow-ups of pregnancies complicatedby an isolated single umbilical artery and to provide data on Turkish cases in such an aspect that ethnic divergences may have influence.Material and Methods: A total of 16568 singleton pregnancies that were delivered between May 2006 and May 2013 were retrospective -ly screened. Ninety-three fetuses were found to have an isolated single umbilical artery. One-hundred pregnancies that did not show anystructural or chromosomal abnormalities were randomly selected from the rest of the cases to establish the control group. IBM SPSS Statis -tics 20.0 software was utilized for statistical analysis. Non-parametric data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test and were presented asmeans±standard deviations. P values less than 0.05 were statistically significant. For the adjustment of confounding factors, odds ratios (ORs)and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: The incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was found to be significantly higherin cases with an isolated single umbilical artery (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, S., SÖYLEMEZ, F., ÖZKAVUKÇU, E., TÜLEK, F., KAHRAMAN, A. (2022). Determination of risk factors and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies complicated by isolated single umbilical artery in Turkish population. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 21–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/567540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Parilla BV, Tamura RK, MacGregor SN, Geibel LJ, Sabbagha RE. The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated finding on prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1995
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, Van den Hof M. Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Jones TB, Sorokin Y, Bhatia R, Zador IE, Bottoms SF. Single umbili- cal artery: accurate diagnosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Khalil MI, Sagr ER, Elrifaei RM, Abdelbasit OB, Halouly TA. Outcomes of an isolated single umbilical artery in singleton preg- nancy: a large study from the Middle East andGulf region. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Chow JS, Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Frequency and nature of structural anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries. J Ultrasound Med 1998
  6. Saller DN, Keene CL, Sun CJ, Schwartz S. The association of single umbilical artery with cytogenetically abnormal pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Ashwal E, Melamed N, Hiersch L, Edel S, Bardin R, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. The impact of isolated single umbilical artery on labor and delivery outcome. Prenat Diagn 2014
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Doğan S, Özyüncü Ö, Atak Z, Turgal M. Perinatal outcome in cases of isolated single umbilical artery and its effects on neonatal cord blood gas indices. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Sener T, Ozalp S, Hassa H, Zeytinoglu S, Basaran N, Durak B. Ultrasonographic detection of single umbilical artery: a simple marker of fetal anomaly. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Atılgan R, Boztosun A, Çelik A, Özercan MR. Tek Umbilikal Arterli Fetuslarda Yapısal Anomalilerin Sıklığı: 34 Olgunun Sonuçları. Fırat Tıp Derg 2012
  11. Muhcu M, Müngen E, Dündar Ö, Bodur S, Atay V, Yergök YZ. Tek Umbilikal Arter Olgularının Değerlendirilmesi. Perinatoloji Dergisi 2006
  12. Salihoglu O, Karatekin G, Uslu S, Can E, Baksu B, Nuhoglu A. New intrauterine growth percentiles: a hospital-based study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc 2012
  13. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Volpe G,