SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Safety and efficacy of synchronous panniculectomyand endometrial cancer surgery in obese patients: asystematic review of the literature and meta-analysis ofpostoperative complications

Christos IAVAZZO
Victoria PSOMİADOU
Anastasia PRODROMİDOU
Athanasios DOULIGERIS
George VORGIAS
Nikolaos MACHAIRAS
Anna PASPALA
Konstantinos BAKOGIANNIS
Pages
279–286
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Panniculectomy combined surgery for the management of EC appears to be a safe procedure and results in comparable outcomes compared with conventional laparotomy with regard to complications and improved wound breakdown rates. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2020; 21: 279-86)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Panniculectomy combined with gynaecological surgery constitutes an alternative approach for endometrial cancer (EC) in obese patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four electronic databases were systematically searched for articles published up to May 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Panniculectomy combined surgery for the management of EC appears to be a safe procedure and results in comparable outcomes compared with conventional laparotomy with regard to complications and improved wound breakdown rates. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2020; 21: 279-86)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Panniculectomy combined with gynaecological surgery constitutes an alternative approach for endometrial cancer (EC) in obese patients. The present study aimed to assess the current knowledge concerning the safety and efficacy of combining panniculectomy in surgical management of EC. Four electronic databases were systematically searched for articles published up to May 2019. A total of five studies, of which two were noncomparative and three comparative, were included. Meta-analysis of complications among panniculectomy and conventional laparotomy group revealed no difference in either intra- or post-operative complication rates. Moreover, no difference was reported in surgical site complications (p=0.59), while wound breakdown rates were significantly elevated in the laparotomy group (p=0.02). Panniculectomy combined surgery for the management of EC appears to be a safe procedure and results in comparable outcomes compared with conventional laparotomy with regard to complications and improved wound breakdown rates. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2020; 21: 279-86)

🔖

Cite This Article

IAVAZZO, C., PSOMİADOU, V., PRODROMİDOU, A., DOULIGERIS, A., VORGIAS, G., MACHAIRAS, N., PASPALA, A., BAKOGIANNIS, K. (2022). Safety and efficacy of synchronous panniculectomyand endometrial cancer surgery in obese patients: asystematic review of the literature and meta-analysis ofpostoperative complications. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 279–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/567427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7-30
  2. Prodromidou A, Vorgias G, Bakogiannis K, Kalinoglou N, Iavazzo C. MELF pattern of myometrial invasion and role in possible endometrial cancer diagnostic pathway: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 230: 147-52
  3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
  4. Hagemann AR, McCourt CK, Varaday SS, Moore KN. Defining and mitigating the challenges of an older and obese population in minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 148: 601-8
  5. Hubbard VS. Defining overweight and obesity: what are the issues? Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 1067-8
  6. Winocour J, Gupta V, Ramirez JR, Shack RB, Grotting JC, Higdon KK. Abdominoplasty: risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136: 597e-606e
  7. Dutot MC, Serror K, Al Ameri O, Chaouat M, Mimoun M, Boccara D. Improving safety after abdominoplasty: a retrospective review of 1128 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142: 355-62
  8. Pearl ML, Valea FA, Disilvestro PA, Chalas E. Panniculectomy in morbidly obese gynecologic oncology patients. Int J Surg Investig 2000; 2: 59-64
  9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
  10. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 712-6
  11. DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28: 105-14
  12. Wallace SA, Mericli AF, Taylor PT, Drake DB. Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: a single center case series of 15 combined procedures. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71: 88-92
  13. Blomfield PI, Le T, Allen DG, Planner RS. Panniculectomy: a useful technique for the obese patient undergoing gynecological surgery. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 70: 80-6
  14. Hopkins MP, Shriner AM, Parker MG, Scott L. Panniculectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery in morbidly obese