Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Partial mole with coexistent live fetus: A systematic review of case reports

Pages
83–94
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An obstetrician, maternal fetal medicine specialist, gynecology oncologist and neonatal intensivist should be involved in the care of such pregnancies. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2022; 23: 83-94)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Molar pregnancy coexistent with a live fetus can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With increasing incidence of multiple pregnancies, there has also been an increase in twin pregnancy with one mole in the recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An obstetrician, maternal fetal medicine specialist, gynecology oncologist and neonatal intensivist should be involved in the care of such pregnancies. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2022; 23: 83-94)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Molar pregnancy coexistent with a live fetus can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. With increasing incidence of multiple pregnancies, there has also been an increase in twin pregnancy with one mole in the recent years. The authors discuss the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and prenatal diagnosis and attempt to design a possible management strategy, to help guide the treating physician, in the management of partial mole with live pregnancy, thereby improving maternal and fetal prognosis. Material and Methods: Numerous case reports have been published in various journals regarding management of individual cases of partial molar pregnancy coexistent with live fetus (PMCF). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of all the case reports and short case series in English concerning partial mole with live pregnancy from 1999 to 2019, that is in the last 20 years. Results: In total, 44 case reports of PMCF were analyzed. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 20+6 (range: 10-40) weeks. Less than half (19/44; 43.2%) were asymptomatic at the time of detection and PMCF was detected on routine scan done for fetal well-being or 11-13-week scan. The majority (56.8%) resulted in the birth of a healthy live fetus. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia developed in 3/44 (6.8%). Conclusion: PMCF involves a high risk of bleeding, preterm labour, intrauterine growth restriction and stillbirth. Successful management of such cases needs prenatal diagnosis, antepartum surveillance and post-natal follow-up. An obstetrician, maternal fetal medicine specialist, gynecology oncologist and neonatal intensivist should be involved in the care of such pregnancies. (J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2022; 23: 83-94)

🔖

Cite This Article

KHOIWAL, K., MANGLA, M., KAUR, H. (2022). Partial mole with coexistent live fetus: A systematic review of case reports. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 83–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/567343

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Suzuki M, Matsunobu A, Vakita K, Osanai K. Hydatidiform mole with surviving co-existent fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56: 384-88
  2. Vaisbuch E, Ben-Arie A, Dgani R, Perlman S, Sokolovsky N, Hagay Z. Twin pregnancy consisting of a complete hydatidiform mole and co-existent fetus: report of two cases and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 98: 19-23
  3. Yanık A, Yanık FF, Urman B. Partial hydatidiform mole in a triplet pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Case report and review of the literature. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2006; 3: 70- 2
  4. Dolapcioglu K, Gungoren A, Hakverdi S, Hakverdi AU, Egilmez E. Twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and co-existent live fetus: Two case reports and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279: 431-36
  5. Tidy J, Seckl M, Hancock VW. On behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Management of gestational trophoblastic disease. BJOG 2021; I28: e1-e27
  6. Rathod AD, Pajai SP, Gaddikeri A. Partial mole with a coexistent viable fetus—a clinical dilemma: a case report with review of literature. J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 6: 51-5
  7. Wee L, Jauniaux E. Prenatal diagnosis and management of twin pregnancies complicated by a co-existing molar pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 772-76
  8. Mangla M, Singla D, Kaur H and Sharma S. Unusual clinical presentation of choriocarcinoma- A systematic review of case reports. Taiwan J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 56: 1-8
  9. Sarno AP Jr, Moorman AJ, Kalousek DK. Partial molar pregnancy with fetal survival: an unusual example of confined placental mosaic. Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 82: 716-19
  10. Vejerslev LO. Clinical management and diagnostic possibilities in hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 46: 577-88
  11. Moscoso G, Jauniaux E, Hustin J. Placental vascular anomaly with diffuse mesenchymal stem villous hyperplasia. A new clinicopathological entity? Pathol Res Pract 1991; 187: 324-28
  12. Zalel Y, Gamzu R, Weiss Y, Schiff E, Shalmon B, Dolizky M, et al. Role of color Doppler imaging in diagnosing and managing pregnancies complicated by placental chorioangioma. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 264-69
  13. Tse KY, Chan KKL, Tam KF, Ngan HYS. An update on gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 2012; 22: 7-15
  14. Unsal MA, Aran T, Dinc H, Cekic B. Internal iliac artery embolisation in the treatment of uncontrolled haemorrhage associated with placenta accreta and p