Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Anesthesia practices in intracranial mass surgery: a retrospective study

İntrakranial kitle cerrahisinde anestezi uygulamaları: retrospektif çalışma

Pages
86–91
Publication Date
2017-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To reduced morbidity and mortality, the possible complications must be recognized and treated early with invasive monitoring, strict hemodynamics and blood gas monitoring.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to present our evaluate anesthesia experience in patients who underwent intracranial tumor surgery and to discuss the current literature on the perioperative management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: ASA risk classification I-III 112 patients between the ages of 3-78 were evaluated retrospectively who underwent intracranial mass surgery between the years 2015-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To reduced morbidity and mortality, the possible complications must be recognized and treated early with invasive monitoring, strict hemodynamics and blood gas monitoring.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İntrakranial kitle cerrahisi · kraniotomi · nöroanestezi

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to present our evaluate anesthesia experience in patients who underwent intracranial tumor surgery and to discuss the current literature on the perioperative management. Material and Methods: ASA risk classification I-III 112 patients between the ages of 3-78 were evaluated retrospectively who underwent intracranial mass surgery between the years 2015-2016. Anesthesia registration forms, patient files and hospital computer system was used.for data. The demographic characteristics of patients, anesthetic management, and postoperative data were recorded. Results: The age of patients ranged from 3-78 years and 57.1% of them were men. Masses were localized in supratentorial area in 87.5% (98) of cases. Mean operation time was 184 minutes, mean length of intensive care unit was 3 days and length of hospital stay was 7 days. Common vomplications seen during intraoperative period were tachycardia (5.4%), bradycardia (3.6%), hypertension (3.6%) and hypotension (1.8%). In the following days, 13 (11.6%) patient received repeated operation. There was not mortality. Conclusion: Several anesthetic techniques may be used successfully to provide anesthesia for resection of intracranial mass surgery. To reduced morbidity and mortality, the possible complications must be recognized and treated early with invasive monitoring, strict hemodynamics and blood gas monitoring.

Özet

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada hastanemizde intrakranial kitle cerrahisi uygulanan hastalardaki anestezi deneyimimizin değerlendirilmesi ve perioperatif yönetimin literatür eşliğinde tartışılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: 2015-2016 tarihleri arasında intrakranial kitle cerrahisi geçiren yaşları 3 ile 78 arasında ASA risk sınıflaması I-III olan 112 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Veriler için anestezi kayıt formları, hasta dosyaları ve hastane bilgisayar sistemi kullanıldı. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, anestezi yönetimi ve postoperatif bilgileri kaydedildi.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş aralığı 3 ile 78 arasında değiştiği ve %57.1’nin erkek olduğu tespit edildi. 98 (%87.5) hastanın kitlesi supratentorial bölgede iken 14 (%12.5)’nin infratentorial bölgede lokalize olduğu saptandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 184 dakika, ortalama yoğun bakımda kalış süresi 3 gün, hastanede kalış süresi 7 gündür. İntroperatif dönemde görülen komplikasyonlar arasında taşikardi (%5.4), bradikardi (%3.6), hipertansiyon (%3.6) ve hipotansiyon (%1.8) yer almaktadır. Takiplerde 13 (%11.6) hastanın tekrar operasyona alındı. Preoperatif ve postoperatif dönemde ölüm ile karşılaşılmadı Sonuç: İntrakranial kitle cerrahisi için nöroaanestezi uygulamalarında çeşitli anestezi teknikleri başarıyla kullanılabilir. İnvaziv monitorizasyon, sıkı hemodinami ve kan gazı takibi ile olası komplikasyonlar erken fark edilerek mortalite ve morbidite azaltılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özmete, Ö., Arıboğan, A. (2017). Anesthesia practices in intracranial mass surgery: a retrospective study. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 86–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/56689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Dunham C. Pediatric brain tumors, a histologic and genetic update on commonly encountered entities. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2010;27:147-59
  2. Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Balmongkon B, Chaisomboonpan S. Nicardipine versus lidocaine for attenuating the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation. J Anest. 2000;14:77-81
  3. Kayhan Z. Klinik Anestezi, Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı, İstanbul, Logos Yayıncılık, 2004
  4. Stevenson KL. Pediatric brain tumors. J Neuroscience. 2004;1:10-20
  5. Lunn JN, Farrow SC, Fowkes FG, Robertson IB, Samuel P. Epidemiology in anaesthesia. I: Anaesthetic practice over 20 years. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54:803-9
  6. Moshchev DA, Lubnin Alu. Use of sevoflurane in neuroanesthesiology. Anestheziol Reanimatol. 2006;2:25-32
  7. Tanskanen PE, Kytta JV, Randell TT, Aanta RE. Dexmedetomidine as an anaesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing intracranial tumour surgery:a double-blind, randomized and plasebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:658-65
  8. Yamada M, Nishikawa K, Kawahara F, Yoshikawa D, Saito S, Goto F. Anesthetic management for clipping a giant basilar artery aneurysm with moderate hypothermia, extracorporeal circulation assistance, and propofol infusion. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15:274-7
  9. Coles JP, Leary TS, Monteiro JN, Brazier P, Summors A, Doyle P et al. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy: a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000;12:15-20
  10. Farling P, Unni A, Young A. Total intravenous anaesthesia for intracranial aneurysm surgery. In Focus on Infusion, Intravenous Anaesthesia (Ed C Prys-Roberts):164-7. London, Current Medical Literature Ltd, 1991
  11. Matsumoto H, Shingu K, Numata K. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol is advantageous than thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia in the recovery phase. Masui. 1998;47:1046–58
  12. Ku AS, Hu Y, Irwin MG, Chow B, Gunawardene S, Tan EE et al. Effect of sevoflurane/nitrous oxide versus propofol anaesthesia on somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord during surgery to correct scoliosis. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:502-7
  13. Schmidt J, Fechner J, Fritsch B, Schmitz B, Carbon R, Rösch W et al. Propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil for anesthesia for pediatric procedures in infants, children and adolescents. Der Anaesthesist. 2001;50:757-66
  14. Yli-Hankala A, Vakkuri A, Annila P, Korttila K. EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: a