Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of laboratory indices for predicting severity of fibrosis in treatment naive young male patients with non-cirrhotic hepatitis B virus infection

Tedavi görmemiş sirozu olmayan hepatit B virüs enfeksiyonu olan erkek hastalarda fibrozis şiddetini öngörmede laboratuar indekslerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
299–307
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We considered that optimal cut-off values defining significant fibrosis for serum HBV DNA level was 4.5 log10 IU/ml (sensivity:71.8%, specificity:70.9%), for APRI was 0.45 (sensivity:63.4%, specificity: 63.3%), for FIB-4 index was 0.45 (sensivity:64.8%, specificity:64.3%) and lastly for King’s score was 4.00 (sensivity:67.6%, specificity:60.8%).Conclusion: We identified that the scoring systems such as APRI, FIB-4 index and ing’s score are not superior to each other, but serum HBV DNA level is a little better compared with those to predict significiant fibrosis in treatment naive young male patients with non-cirrhotic HBV infection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: We aimed to assess serum levels of AST and ALT, platelet counts, INR or serum HBV DNA levels, especially in score systems such as APRI (AST/platelet ratio), FIB-4 index and King’s score, for predicting severity of fibrosis.Material and Methods: One hundred fifty treatment naive male HBV patients underwent percutaneous liver biopsy were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For evaluating the difference in variables and scores, patients were divided into 2 groups such as no or minimal fibrosis group (fibrosis score<2) and significiant fibrosis group (fibrosis score≥2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We considered that optimal cut-off values defining significant fibrosis for serum HBV DNA level was 4.5 log10 IU/ml (sensivity:71.8%, specificity:70.9%), for APRI was 0.45 (sensivity:63.4%, specificity: 63.3%), for FIB-4 index was 0.45 (sensivity:64.8%, specificity:64.3%) and lastly for King’s score was 4.00 (sensivity:67.6%, specificity:60.8%).Conclusion: We identified that the scoring systems such as APRI, FIB-4 index and ing’s score are not superior to each other, but serum HBV DNA level is a little better compared with those to predict significiant fibrosis in treatment naive young male patients with non-cirrhotic HBV infection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hepatitis B virus · fibrosis · HBV DNA

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to assess serum levels of AST and ALT, platelet counts, INR or serum HBV DNA levels, especially in score systems such as APRI (AST/platelet ratio), FIB-4 index and King’s score, for predicting severity of fibrosis.Material and Methods: One hundred fifty treatment naive male HBV patients underwent percutaneous liver biopsy were evaluated retrospectively. For evaluating the difference in variables and scores, patients were divided into 2 groups such as no or minimal fibrosis group (fibrosis score<2) and significiant fibrosis group (fibrosis score≥2). Results: There were 79 patients (52.7%) with minimal fibrosis and 71 patients (42.3%) with significiant fibrosis. We considered that optimal cut-off values defining significant fibrosis for serum HBV DNA level was 4.5 log10 IU/ml (sensivity:71.8%, specificity:70.9%), for APRI was 0.45 (sensivity:63.4%, specificity: 63.3%), for FIB-4 index was 0.45 (sensivity:64.8%, specificity:64.3%) and lastly for King’s score was 4.00 (sensivity:67.6%, specificity:60.8%).Conclusion: We identified that the scoring systems such as APRI, FIB-4 index and ing’s score are not superior to each other, but serum HBV DNA level is a little better compared with those to predict significiant fibrosis in treatment naive young male patients with non-cirrhotic HBV infection.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada fibrozis ciddiyetini öngörmede, serum aspartat aminotransferaz (AST) ve alanin aminotransferaz (ALT) seviyeleri, platelet sayısı, INR değeri veya serum Hepatit B virüs (HBV) deoksiribonükleik asit (DNA) seviyelerinin, özellikle AST-platelet oranı (APRI), FIB-4 indeks ve King’s skoru gibi skorlama sistemleri içinde değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yüzelli karaciğer iğne biyopsisi olan tedavi naif erkek HBV hastaları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Değişkenler arasında farkı değerlendirmek amacıyla, hastalar minimal fibrozisi olanlar (fibrozis skoru<2) ve anlamlı fibrozisi olanlar (fibrozis skoru≥2) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Minimal fibrozisi olan 79 hasta (52.7%) ve anlamlı fibrozisi olan 71 hasta (42.3%) vardı. Anlamlı fibrozisi tanımlayan optimal değeri, HBV DNA seviyesi için 4.5 log10 IU/ml (duyarlılık:71.8%, özgüllük:70.9%), APRI için 0.45 (duyarlılık:63.4%, özgüllük:63.3%), FIB-4 indeks için 0.45 (duyarlılık:64.8%, özgüllük:64.3%) ve son olarak King’s skor için 4.00 (duyarlılık: 67.6%, özgüllük:60.8%) olarak belirledik.Sonuç: Tedavi görmemiş sirozu olmayan HBV enfeksiyonu olan erkek hastalarda fibrozis ciddiyetini öngörmede APRI, FIB-4 index ve King’s skorun birbirlerine üstünlüğünün olmadığını, ancak serum HBV DNA seviyelerinin bu skorlara kıyasla biraz daha iyi olduğunu değerlendirmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

AFYON, M., ARTUK, C., YENİLMEZ, E., ŞİMŞEK, B., KAYA, A. (2017). Assessment of laboratory indices for predicting severity of fibrosis in treatment naive young male patients with non-cirrhotic hepatitis B virus infection. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 299–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/56666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Prevention, Care and Treatment of Persons With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2015
  2. Afyon M. Letter: nucleos(t)ide analogues are good, but not sufficient for hepatitis B virus clearance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:654-5
  3. Yenilmez E, Afyon M, Ulcay A, Ulus S, Kaya A, Erdem H. Evaluation of 135 liver biopsy results between 2011 and 2014, according to hepatitis B virus DNA and liver transaminase levels in naive young patients with HBeAg positive and negative chronic hepatitis B infection. J Clin Virol. 2015;69:235
  4. Kose S, Ersan G, Tatar B, Adar P, Sengel BE. Evaluation of percutaneous liver biopsy complications in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Eurasian J Med. 2015;47:161-4
  5. Afyon M, Artuk C. Noninvasive indirect serum markers of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:397-8
  6. Stasi C, Milani S. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Between prediction/prevention of outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1711-20
  7. Abdollahi M, Pouri A, Ghojazadeh M, Estakhri R, Somi M. Non-invasive serum fibrosis markers: A study in chronic hepatitis. Bioimpacts. 2015;5:17-23
  8. Schmid P, Bregenzer A, Huber M, Rauch A, Jochum W, Müllhaupt B et al. Progression of liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infection: a comparison between non-invasive assessment methods and liver biopsy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138838 9. Kim WR, Berg T, Asselah T, Flisiak R, Fung S, Gordon SC et al. Evaluation of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients. J Hepatol. 2016;64:773-80
  9. Vergara M, Bejarano G, Dalmau B, Gil M, Miquel M, Sanchez-Delgado J et al. Usefulness of indirect noninvasive methods in predicting progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:826-33
  10. Tachi Y, Hirai T, Toyoda H, Tada T, Hayashi K, Honda T et al. Predictive ability of laboratory indices for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis c after the eradication of hepatitis c virus. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133515
  11. Li SM, Li GX, Fu DM, Wang Y, Dang LQ. Liver fibrosis evaluation by ARFI and APRI in chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9528-33
  12. Kliemann DA, Wolff FH, Tovo CV, Alencastro PR, Ikeda ML, Brandão AB et al. Biochemical non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis cannot replace biopsy in HIV-HCV coinfected