SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Günümüz ulaştırma felsefesinde limanlar

Ports in today's transport philosophy

Güler Bilen ALKAN
Pages
153–169
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study the ports are examined ports in view of present transport philosophy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The two traditional and primary users of seaports tare the shipping companies and traders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Shipping companies are mostly concerned with reliable, competitive and quickest possible turn-round of their vessels; whereas the traders' concern is for the safe and due delivery of their goods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study the ports are examined ports in view of present transport philosophy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The two traditional and primary users of seaports tare the shipping companies and traders. Shipping companies are mostly concerned with reliable, competitive and quickest possible turn-round of their vessels; whereas the traders' concern is for the safe and due delivery of their goods. Ports provide many numbers of services for their customers in the form of handling of and supplying for ships; shipment, storage, discharging and forwarding operations for cargoes, embarking and disembarking for passengers. Ports earn income by charging port users for the use of their facilities and services. Port users are, inter alia, ship owners (or ship managers), shipping and forwarding agents, cargo owners and passengers. Ports are subject to fierce competition of other neighbouring or regional ports, domestic or foreign in character, depending upon of course the management philosophy. In this study the ports are examined ports in view of present transport philosophy.

Özet

Limanların ilk ve geleneksel iki adet kullanıcısı; denizcilik şirketleri ve deniz ticareti ile ilgili olanlardır.Denizcilik şirketleri çoğunlukla güven, rekabet ve geminin geri dönüş hızının mümkün olduğunca en hızlı olduğuyla ilgiliyken, deniz ticareti ile ilgili olanlar güvenlik ve malların taşınması ile ilgilidirlef.Limanlar müşterilerine gemilerin sağlanması ve yükleme boşaltma hizmetleri formunda birçok hizmetler sağlar. Bu hizmetler; yükleriçin nakliye, depolama, tahliye ve aracılık işlemleri, yolcu için; indirme ve bindirme işlemleridir. Limanlar liman kullanıcıları sayesinde liman tesisleri ve hizmetlerinin kullanımıyla gelir kazanır Liman kullanıcıları diğerlerine ilaveten gemi sahipleri (veya gemi işletenleri), sevkıyat acenteleri, yük sahipleri ve yolculardır. Limanlar yönetim felsefesine dayalı olarak yurt içi ve yabancı karakterdeki diğer komşu ve bölgesel limanların çok fazla etkisi altındadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada, günümüzde ulaştırma felsefesinde limanların konumu incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKAN, G. B. (2022). Günümüz ulaştırma felsefesinde limanlar. Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 153–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/566547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akten, N. (1999). Turkish Port Industry at the Doorstep of the EU: Problems and How to Restructure the Ports, Seminar for National Ports Master Plan, Ankara, December, 1-2, 9. Alderton, P. M., (1995/ Sea transport operation and economics, Thomas Reed Publications, London, 29. Bird, J. (1971).
  2. Seaports and seaport terminals, Hutchinson University Library, London. Birgun, S. and Akten, N. (2004). Relative Efficiencies of Seaport Container Terminals: A DEA Perspective, International J. Integrated Supply Management, (In press). Birgun, Barla S. and Akten N. (2001). Measuring the Efficiency of Seaports: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, CD-ROM of International Conference on Production Research ICPR-16, Prague, 29 July-3 August. Bowersox, D. (2004). Fundamentals of Logistics and Supply Chain, 2004
  3. CLM Annual Conference, Council of Logistics Management (CLM), Oak Brook,US A, 2-3.
  4. Branch, A. E. (1986). Elements of port operation and management, Chapman and Hall, London,9. Brodie, P. (2003).
  5. Dictionary of Shipping Terms, Lloyd's of London Press, London, 37-38, 241. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (June 17, 1999).
  6. COM(1999) 277 Final, Decision No. 1692/96/EC as regards seaports, inland ports and intermodal terminals, Parliament and Council Division, Art. 1(3), Brussels. European Commission (1998). Green Paper on sea ports and maritime infrastructure, Common transport policy, Luxembourg. Goetz A. R. and Rodrigue J. P., 1999. Transport terminals: New perspectives,J Transport Geography, 7:255-261.
  7. Guner, S.İ., Bilican, Or. (1997). The Conditions of Supply and Demand in Maritime Transportation, Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the International Maritime Association of Mediterranean, Volume II, Istanbul, Turkey. Gray R. and Kim G. (2001).
  8. Logistics and international shipping, Institute of International Maritime Affairs, Korea Maritime University. IMO News, No.3 (2001): World maritime day, 1. Oram R.B., Baker C.C.R. (1971).
  9. The efficient port, Pergamon Press,
  10. London. Preston, P. and Kozan, E. (2001) An Approach to Determine Storage Locations of Containers at Seaport Terminals, Computers and Operations Research, 28:903-995.
  11. Tongzon, J.(1999). Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and other International Ports using Data Envelopment Analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35:107-122.
  12. UNCTAD (1975). Technical and financial aspects of modern transport technologies used in ultimodal transport operations, TD/B/AC.15/15,