Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Cancerous cell lines alter their genomic organization and karyotype with increased passage number: a cytogenetic study

Kanserli hücre hatları, pasaj sayısı arttıkça genomik organizasyonunu ve karyotipini değiştirir: sitogenetik bir çalışma

Pages
923–930
Publication Date
2018-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is always best to verify karyotype before employing a specific cell line in a research project.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The limited use of mammals in human health related scientific research has led to the development of new research strategies like cell culture techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: MCF7, HCT116, A549, SHSY5Y, HEPG2, and NIH3T3 cell lines were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is always best to verify karyotype before employing a specific cell line in a research project.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanserli hücre hattı · sitogenetik analiz · MCF7

Abstract

Purpose: The limited use of mammals in human health related scientific research has led to the development of new research strategies like cell culture techniques. Commercially available cancerous cell lines that are well characterized by cytogenetics and biochemical markers allow comparison of results among different laboratories. However, as these cell lines tend to be maintained in culture over long periods of time, mutations can occur that may change characteristics and responses of cell lines that have initially been identified or non-existed at earlier passages. Here we cytogenetically investigated the chromosomal rearrangements in repeated cultures of six different cell lines over continuous passages. Method: MCF7, HCT116, A549, SHSY5Y, HEPG2, and NIH3T3 cell lines were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. GTG banding procedure was used for the analysis of metaphase chromosomes, at least 20 metaphases were analyzed per cell line. Results: We found chromosome number variations and structural changes in the all examined cell cultures as the passage numbers increase. Conclusion: Cell lines have long been used in research to test drugs, to delineate molecular mechanisms, to understand the environmental effects and so on. The most important feature of a cell line is its genotype and karyotype similarities with their host organism. Cancer Cell lines, possess genomic/chromosomal instability that also lead them to change their phenotype along with their karyotype from one passage to next. Therefore, it is always best to verify karyotype before employing a specific cell line in a research project.

Özet

Amaç: İnsan sağlığına ilişkin bilimsel araştırmalarda memelilerin sınırlı kullanımı yeni araştırma stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine yol açmıştır. Bunlardan birisi memeli hücre kültürü tekniğidir. Piyasada bulunan, sitogenetik ve biyokimyasal belirteçlerle iyi karakterize edilmiş kanser hücre hatları farklı laboratuvarlar arasındaki sonuçların karşılaştırılmasına olanak sağlar. Bununla birlikte, bu hücre dizileri, kültürde uzun bir süre muhafaza edildiklerinden, önceki pasajlarda tanımlanmış veya saptanmamış, hücre hatlarının özelliklerini ve ajanlara karşı tepkilerini değiştirebilecek mutasyonlar meydana gelebilir. Burada sitogenetik olarak, altı farklı hücre hattının tekrarlanan hücre kültürlerinde yeni kromozomal düzenlenmeleri araştırdık. Metod: MCF7, HCT116, A549, SHSY5Y, HEPG2 ve NIH3T3 hücre hatları, %10 FBS ve %1 penisilin-streptomisin içeren DMEM besiyerinde kültüre edildi. Metafaz kromozomlarının analizi için GTG bantlama prosedürü kullanıldı ve en az 20 metafaz analiz edildi. Bulgular: İncelenen hücre kültürlerinde pasaj sayısı artışıyla kromozom sayı varyasyonları ve yapısal değişiklikler tespit ettik. Sonuç: İlaçları test etmek, moleküler mekanizmaları tanımlamak, çevresel etkileri anlamak için hücre hatları uzun süredir araştırmalarda kullanılmaktadır. Bir hücre dizisinin en önemli özelliği, konak organizmasıyla olan genotip ve karyotip benzerlikleridir. Kanser Hücresi soyları, genomik/kromozomal dengesizliğe sahiptir ve bu da her pasajda fenotip değişimi ile birlikte karyotip değişimine neden olabilmaktedir. Bu nedenle, hücre kültürlerinin kullanılacağı bir araştırma projesine başlamadan muhakkak kullanılan hücre hattının karyotipini doğrulamak gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M. B., TUNÇ, E., ILGAZ, N. S., ÖKSÜZ, H., ÖZTECİK, E., ÖZPAK, L., ÖCAL, İ., PAZARBAŞI, A., DEMİRHAN, O. (2018). Cancerous cell lines alter their genomic organization and karyotype with increased passage number: a cytogenetic study. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 923–930. https://ajindex.com/articles/56555

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hassanpour SH, Dehghani M. Review of cancer from perspective of molecular. Journal of Cancer Research and Practice. 2017;6:127-9
  2. Mitelman F. Cancer cytogenetics update 2005. Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology. 2005
  3. Lobo, I. Chromosome abnormalities and cancer cytogenetics. Nature Education. 2008;1:68
  4. Kytölä S, Rummukainen J, Nordgren A, Karhu R, Farnebo F, Isola J et al. Chromosomal alterations in 15 breast cancer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;28:308-17
  5. Macleod RA, Kaufmann M, Drexler HG. Cytogenetic analysis of cancer cell lines. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;731:57-78
  6. Silicka MJ. History of cell culture. In New Insights into Cell Culture Technology (Ed SJT Gowder). London, Intech Open, 2017 7. Kaur G, Dufour JM. Cell lines: valuable tools or useless artifacts. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2:1-5
  7. Wenger SL, Senft JR, Sargent LM, Bamezai R, Bairwa N, Grant SG. Comparison of established cell lines at different passages by karyotype and comparative genomic hybridization. Biosci Rep. 2004;24:631-9
  8. Sigma-Aldrich. Fundamental Techniques in Cell Culture: a Laboratory Handbook, 2nd edition. Darmstadt, Sigma-Aldrich, 2010
  9. Cell line profile. Available from https://www.phe-culturecollections.org.uk/media/130237/mcf7-cell-line-profile.pdf (accessed Feb 2018)
  10. MCF7 (ATCC® HTB-22™). Available rom https://www.lgcstandards- atcc.org/ Products/All/HTB-22.aspx? geo_country=tr# characteristics. (accessed Jan 2018)
  11. HCT 116 (ATCC® CCL-247™) Available from https://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/products/all/ CCL-247.aspx? geo_country=tr#general information (accessed Jan 2018)
  12. Gazdar AF, Girard L, Lockwood WW, Lam WL, Minna JD. Lung cancer cell lines as tools for biomedical discovery and research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1310-21
  13. CCL-185. Available from https://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/Products/All/CCL-185.aspx? geo_country = tr# characteristics (accessed Nov 2017)
  14. Human-neuroblastoma-cell-line. Available from https://www.mskcc.org/research-advantage/ support/technology/tangible-material/ human-neuroblastoma-cell-line-sh-sy5y (accessed Nov 2017)
  15. SH-SY5Y (ATCC® CRL-2266™). Available from https://www.lgcstandardscc.org/Products/ Cells_ and _Microorganisms/By_Tissue/Bone_ MarrowCRL -2266.aspx? geo_country= tr#characteristics (accessed Nov 2017)
  16. Hep G2 [HEPG2] (ATCC® HB-8065™) Available from https://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/