Journals / Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A bibliometric analysis of food studies: Evidence from British Food Journal

Pages
67–79
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that BFJ is one of the leading and prominent journals with the number of publications increasing each year according to the basic indicators mentioned above.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the current study is to overview the British Food Journal publications from 2010 to 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly, a total of 1892 documents published from 2010 to 2020 in the British Food Journal (BFJ) was obtained from the Web of Science database (WoS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that BFJ is one of the leading and prominent journals with the number of publications increasing each year according to the basic indicators mentioned above.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:food · Food studies · British Food Journal

Abstract

The objective of the current study is to overview the British Food Journal publications from 2010 to 2020. To address our purpose, bibliometric and visualization analyses were used. Firstly, a total of 1892 documents published from 2010 to 2020 in the British Food Journal (BFJ) was obtained from the Web of Science database (WoS). Then, the analyses were made by running VOS viewer software. In the process of analyzing data, we have principally considered some bibliometric indicators such as the number of annual publications, the most productive organizations, the most cited papers, the most contributing countries, the most productive authors, the co-occurrence of author keywords, the co-authorship of countries, and the co-citation of authors. The results show that BFJ is one of the leading and prominent journals with the number of publications increasing each year according to the basic indicators mentioned above. Further to this, the most productive and contributing authors, institutions, and countries are mainly from European countries. The most common researched fields according to the co-occurrence of author keywords are listed as “consumer behavior, food safety, food products, food industry, food, nutrition, organic food, sustainability, and consumer”.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTEPE, S., ATSIZ, O., ÖĞRETMENOĞLU, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of food studies: Evidence from British Food Journal. Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 67–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/564754

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?. Research Policy, 38 (1), 206-215.
  2. Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., Buysse, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. British Food Journal, 113 (11), 1353-1378.
  3. Akova, O., Cifci, İ., Atsız, O., & Gezeroglu, B. (2016). Understanding the motivational factors of dining out: a study at Fatih Kadinlar Bazaar in Istanbul. Tourismos, 11(1), 19-36.
  4. Al-Swidi, A., Huque, S. M. R., Hafeez, M. H., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. British Food Journal, 116 (10), 1561-1580.
  5. Atsız, O., Cifci, I., & Law, R. (2021). Understanding food experience in sharing-economy platforms: Insights from Eatwith and Withlocals. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 1-26.
  6. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36 (1), 3-72.
  7. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 12, 373-379.
  8. Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., & Man, X. (2017). State of the art on food waste research: A bibliometrics study from 1997 to 2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 840-846.
  9. Çifçi, I., Atsız, O., & Gupta, V. (2021). The street food experiences of the local-guided tour in the meal-sharing economy: the case of Bangkok. British Food Journal, 1-19.
  10. Clarivate. (2021). Journal citation reports. Retrieved from https://apps.clarivate.com/jif/home/?journal=BRIT (accessed 28 January 2021).
  11. Cooper, I. D. (2015). Bibliometrics basics. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103 (4), 217-218.
  12. Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27 (1), 1-7.
  13. Cunill, O. M., Salvá, A. S., Gonzalez, L. O., & Mulet-Forteza, C. (2019). Thirty-fifth anniversary of the International Journal of Hospitality Management: A bibliometric overview. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89-101.
  14. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (8), 981-1012.
  15. Dimitri, C., & Dettmann, R. L. (2012). Organic food consumers: What do we really know about the