Journals / Journal of Mosaic Research / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 10

Batı Doğu ile Buluşuyor: İonia’nın Roma Mozaikleri

West Meets East: Roman Mosaics of Ionia

Pages
213–222
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

New results of archaeological and historical research in recent decades in the urban centers of Ionia provide insight into the sociological related interlacing of Hellenistic and Italo-Roman shapes of technological and decorative design on floor coverings

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tradition and innovation were for centuries characteristic elements of the cultural development of Ionia, that landscape of western Anatolia, whose intellectual achievements became groundbreaking for the European continent and beyond.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Whereas there are dominant the contacts with Egypt, Mesopotamia and Persia in Greek times, with the taking over of the Pergamenian Kingdom by Rome and with the establishment of the proconsular province of Asia (129-126 v.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:New results of archaeological and historical research in recent decades in the urban centers of Ionia provide insight into the sociological related interlacing of Hellenistic and Italo-Roman shapes of technological and decorative design on floor coverings
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tradition and innovation were for centuries characteristic elements of the cultural development of Ionia, that landscape of western Anatolia, whose intellectual achievements became groundbreaking for the European continent and beyond. Whereas there are dominant the contacts with Egypt, Mesopotamia and Persia in Greek times, with the taking over of the Pergamenian Kingdom by Rome and with the establishment of the proconsular province of Asia (129-126 v. Chr.) new trends were initiated from Italy which are reflected in workmanship and art. Taking charge of pavement-types in the facilities of public and private buildings is one of the phenomena that document the cultural exchange between West and East. New results of archaeological and historical research in recent decades in the urban centers of Ionia provide insight into the sociological related interlacing of Hellenistic and Italo-Roman shapes of technological and decorative design on floor coverings

Özet

Gelenek ve yenilik, yüzyıllar boyunca İonia'da kültürel gelişimin karakteristik unsurları olmuştur. Anadolu'nun batısında yer alan bu bölgedeki entellektüel başarılar, Avrupa kıtasında ve ötesinde çığır açan bir manzara oluşturmuştur. Yunan çağlarında Mısır, Mezopotamya ve Pers kültürleri ile olan temaslar, Bergama Krallığı'nın Roma egemenliğine geçmesi ve Asya prokonsül bölgesinin kurulmasıyla işçillik ve sanat alanında kendini gösteren İtalya kökenli yeni eğilimler etkili olmaya başlamıştır. Kamusal ve özel binaların farklı mekanlarındaki döşeme tipleri, Batı ile Doğu arasındaki kültürel değişimi belgeleyen fenomenlerden biridir. İonia kent merkezlerinde son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen arkeolojik ve tarihsel araştırmaların yeni sonuçları, zemin döşemelerinde görülen teknolojik ve dekoratif tasarımlardaki Hellenistik ve İtalik-Roma biçimlerinin sosyolojik olarak birbiri içinde kaynaşması hakkında fikir vermektedir. Bu makalede, Batı Anadolu'nun değişik antik merkezlerinde keşfedilen seçilmiş örnekler ışığında, Yunan opus barbaricum ve opus tessellatum mozaiklerin İtalik-Roma tarzındaki taban döşemelerine kadar giden değişimi tartışılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

JOBST, W. (2022). Batı Doğu ile Buluşuyor: İonia’nın Roma Mozaikleri. Journal of Mosaic Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 10, 213–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/564713

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Andreae 2003
  2. B. Andreae, Antike Bildmosaiken, Mainz am Rhein. Bachmann 2011 M. Bachmann, “Bau Z in Pergamon – Analyse einer “Langfristnutzung”, Ladstätter – Scheibelreiter 2010, 179-191. Balty 1981 J. Balty, “La mosaïque antique au Proche-Orient I. Des origines à la Tétrarchie”, ANRW II 12.2, 347-429. Berti 1983 F. Berti, “I mosaici di Iasos”, CMGR III, 235-246. Bingöl 1997
  3. O. Bingöl, Malerei und Mosaik der Antike in der Türkei, Mainz am Rhein. Bruneau 1972
  4. P. Bruneau, Les mosaïques, Delos 29, Paris. Bruneau 1981 P. Bruneau, “Tendances de la mosaïque en Grèce à l’époque impériale”, ANRW II 12.2, 320-346. CMGR III R. Farioli Campanati (Hrsg.), III colloquio internazionale sul mosaico antico Ravenna 1980, Ravenna 1983. CMGR V P. Johnson – R. Ling – D. J. Smith (Eds.), Fifth International Colloquium on Ancient Mosaics held in Bath, England on September 5-12, 1987, I. II (Ann Arbor, MI 1994/1995). Daszewski 1985
  5. W. A. Daszewski, Corpus of Mosaics from Egypt I. Hellenistic and Early Roman Period. Aegyptiaca Treverensia, Trierer Studien zum Griechisch-Römischen Ägypten Band 3, Mainz am Rhein. Décor I C. Balmelle – M. Blanchard Lemée – J. Christophe – J. P. Darmon – A. M. Guimier Sorbets – H. Lavagne – R. Prudhomme – H. Stern, Le Décor Géométrique De La Mosaïque Romaine I, Paris, 1985. Décor II C. Balmelle – M. Blanchard Lemée – J. P. Darmon – S. Gozlan – M. P. Raynaud, Le Décor Géométrique De La Mosaïque Romaine II, Paris, 2002. Donderer 1986
  6. M. Donderer, Die Chronologie der römischen Mosaiken in Venetien und Istrien bis zur Zeit der Antonine, AF 15, Berlin. Donderer 1987
  7. M. Donderer, Die antiken Pavimenttypen und ihre Benennungen (Zu Plinius, Naturalis Historia 36, 184-189), JdI 102, 365-377. Donderer 1989
  8. M. Donderer, Die Mosaizisten der Antike und ihre wirtschaftliche und soziale Stellung. Eine Quellenstudie, Erlanger Forschungen Reihe A – Geisteswissenschaften Band 48, Erlangen. Donderer 2008
  9. M. Donderer, Die Mosaizisten der Antike II. Epigraphische Quellen – Neufunde und Nachträge, Erlanger Forschungen Reihe A – Geisteswissenschaften Band 116, Erlangen. Dunbabin 1979
  10. K. M. D. Dunbabin, Technique and Materials of Hellenistic Mosaics, AJA 83, 265-277. Dunbabin 1999
  11. K. M. D. Dunbabin, Mosaics oft he Greek and Roman World, Cambridge. Hellenkemper-Salies 1986
  12. G. Hellenkemper-Salies, Römische Mosaiken in Griechenland, BJb 186, 241-284. Hoepfner 2011
  13. W. Hoepfner, Ionien – Brücke zum Orient, Darmstadt. Hoepfner – Schwandner 1994 W. Hoepfner – E. L. Schwandner, Haus