Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Long-term results in congenital penile curvature diseases treated with Nesbit method

Nesbit yöntemi ile tedavi edilen konjenital penil kurvatür hastalarında uzun dönem sonuçları

Pages
388–394
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nesbit is a successful method in the appropriate patient group with CPC with longterm outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, we aimed to report the long-term results of congenital penile curvature (CPC) patients treated by a single surgical team using the Nesbit procedure.Materials and Methods: Forty patients who underwent Nesbit procedure due to CPC in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients had penile length, residual curvature condition after intracavernal papaverine injection at 12 months postoperatively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nesbit is a successful method in the appropriate patient group with CPC with longterm outcomes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:nespit · konjenital penil kurvatür · NESBIT method

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to report the long-term results of congenital penile curvature (CPC) patients treated by a single surgical team using the Nesbit procedure.Materials and Methods: Forty patients who underwent Nesbit procedure due to CPC in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Penile curvature sites of patients were classified as ventral, dorsal, lateral and biplanar. Penile length, curvature and location of the patients were recorded with perioperative measurements and this value was based on patient follow-up. The patients had penile length, residual curvature condition after intracavernal papaverine injection at 12 months postoperatively. At the same time, the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) was questioned and its subjective complaints and satisfaction were evaluated.Results: The mean age of the patients was 26.8 years (18-42). The mean preoperative curvature was 55.6 (40-90) degrees. The mean follow-up was 39.9 (12-97) months. The number of patients with postoperative complete axial regularity was 22 (55%). 17 (42.5%) patients had an average clinically insignificant residual curvature of 13.2 degrees (10-30). One (2.5%) patients had residual (40 degree) curvature. None of the patients had perioperative and early postoperative complications.Conclusion: Curvature grade and location, penis size and erectile capacities in CPC patients are among the factors affecting surgical technique selection. At least the experience of the surgeon as much as these variables influences the choice of the surgeon. Nesbit is a successful method in the appropriate patient group with CPC with longterm outcomes.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada tek cerrahi ekip tarafından Nesbit prosedürü uygulanan konjenital penil kurvatür (KPK) hastalarının uzun dönem sonuçlarını yayınlamayı amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: KPK sebebiyle Nesbit prosedürü uygulanan 40 hasta dosyası retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların penil kurvatür yerleri ventral, dorsal, lateral ve biplanar olarak sınıflandırılmıştı. Hastaların penis uzunluğu, eğrilik derecesi ve yeri perioperatif ölçümlerle kayıt altına alınıp hasta takibinde bu değer esas alınmıştı. Hastalar postoperatif 12. ayda intrakavernal papaverin enjeksiyonu sonrası penis boyu, rezidüel kurvatür durumu kayıt altına alınmıştı. Aynı zamanda Uluslararası Erektil İşlev Formu -5 (IIEF-5) sorgulanıp, sübjektif şikâyetleri ve memnuniyetleri değerlendirildi Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 26.8 (18-42) yıl idi. Preoperatif ortalama kurvatür derecesi 55.6 (40-90) derece idi. Ortalama takip süresi 39.9 (12-97) aydı. Postoperatif rezidüel kurvatürü olmayan hasta sayısı 22 (%55) idi. 17 (%42.5) hastanın ortalama 13.2 derece (10-30) klinik önemsiz rezidüel kurvatürü mevcuttu. Bir (%2.5) hastanın rezidüel (40 derece) kurvatürü mevcuttu. Hastaların hiçbirinde perioperatif ve erken postoperatif komplikasyon görülmedi.Sonuç: KPK hastalarında kurvatür derecesi ve yeri, penis boyutları ve erektil kapasiteleri cerrahi teknik seçimini etkileyen faktörler arasındadırlar. En az bu değişkenler kadar cerrahın tecrübeli olduğu teknikte cerrahın seçimini etkiler. Uzun dönem sonuçlarıyla KPK’ü olan uygun hasta grubunda Nesbit başarılı yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, U., ERÇİL, H., TÜMER, E., ALMA, E., GÜRLEN, G., ŞENER, N. C., GÜRBÜZ, Z. G., EVLİYAOĞLU, Y. (2019). Long-term results in congenital penile curvature diseases treated with Nesbit method. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 388–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/56422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Vicini P, DiNicola S, Antonini G, De Berardinis E, Gentileand V, De Marco F. Geometrical modified nesbit corporoplasty to correct different types of penile curvature: description of the surgical procedure based on geometrical principles and long-term results. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:209-15
  2. Schwarzer U, Sommer F, Klotz T, Braun M, Reifenrath B, Engelmann U. The prevalence of Peyronie’s disease: Results of a large survey. BJU Int. 2001;88:727-30
  3. Yachia D, Beyar M, Aridogan IA, Dascalu S. The incidence of congenital penile curvature. J Urol. 1993;150:1478-9
  4. Ebbehoj J, Metz P. Congenital penile angulation. Br J Urol. 1987;60:264–6
  5. Kelami, A. Congenital penile deviation and its treatment with the Nesbit-Kelami technique. Br J Urol. 1987;60:261
  6. Makovey I, Higuchi TT, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Wood HM. Congenital penile curvature: update and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13:290-7
  7. Nesbit, RM. Congenital curvature of the phallus: report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol. 1965;93:230
  8. Brake M, Keller H, Lamade F, Groh R, Horsch R. Surgical correction of penile deviation. Nesbit vs. Schroeder-Essed method. Urologe A. 1999;38:264-9
  9. Sassine AM, Wespes E, Schulman CC. Modified corporoplasty for penile curvature: 10 years' experience. Urology. 1994;44:419-21
  10. Turunç T, Deveci S, Güvel S, Peşkircioğlu L. Uluslararası cinsel işlev indeksinin 5 soruluk versiyonunun (IIEF-5) türkçe geçerlilik çalışmasının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. 2007;33:45-9
  11. Nyirady P, Kelemen Z, Banfi G, et al. Management of congenital penile curvature. J Urol. 2008;179:1495-8
  12. Hsieh JT, Liu SP, Chen Y, et al. Correction of congenital penile curvature using modified tunical plication with absorbable sutures: The long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Eur Urol. 2007;52:261-6
  13. Popken G, Wetterauer U, Schultze-Seemann W, Deckart AB, Sommerkamp H. A modified corporoplasty for treating congenital penile curvature and reducing the incidence of palpable indurations. BJU Int. 1999;83:71-5
  14. Leonardo C, De Nunzio C, Michetti P, Tartaglia N, Tubaro A, De Dominicis C et al: Plication corporoplasty versus Nesbit operation for the correction of congenital penile curvature. A long-term follow-up. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012; 44: 55-60
  15. Poulsen J, Kirkeby HJ. Treatment of penile curvaturea retrospective study of 175 patients operated with plication of the tunica albuginea or with the Nesbit procedure. Br J Urol.