Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis: early and midterm results

Popliteal ven tutulumu olmayan akut iliofemoral ven trombozunun ultrasonla hızlandırılmış kateter aracılı trombolitik tedavisi: erken ve orta dönem sonuçlar

Pages
347–353
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Duplex ultrasound was performed at one month, six months, one year, and two years following intervention and the iliac vein patency rate was found to be 100%, while superficial femoral vein insufficiency was in 5.6% (n=1), 11.1% (n=2), 16.2% (n=3), and 16.2% (n=3), respectively.Conclusion: Based on our findings, ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe and effective method for carefully selected patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis is a life-threatening pathology which can lead to long-term morbidity due to post-thrombotic syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to assess early and midterm results of the patients undergoing ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis.Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age: 51.89±16.29 years; range, 16 to 72 years) who were diagnosed with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Duplex ultrasound was performed at one month, six months, one year, and two years following intervention and the iliac vein patency rate was found to be 100%, while superficial femoral vein insufficiency was in 5.6% (n=1), 11.1% (n=2), 16.2% (n=3), and 16.2% (n=3), respectively.Conclusion: Based on our findings, ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe and effective method for carefully selected patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kateter aracılı tromboliz · derin ven trombozu · Catheter-directed thrombolysis

Abstract

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis is a life-threatening pathology which can lead to long-term morbidity due to post-thrombotic syndrome. The aim of this study was to assess early and midterm results of the patients undergoing ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis.Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age: 51.89±16.29 years; range, 16 to 72 years) who were diagnosed with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Results: Complete thrombolysis was successful in 88.9% (n=16) and in % 11.1 (n=2) patients with partial clot lysis. No pulmonary embolism was seen, while bleeding at the catheter-insertion site was observed in one patient. In another patient, underlying lesions were successfully treated with balloon angioplasty. No in-hospital mortality or severe complications were observed. The mean follow-up was 31.56±3.35 (range, 25 to 37 months). Ultrasound findings of all the patients were evaluated by a single experienced radiologist. Duplex ultrasound was performed at one month, six months, one year, and two years following intervention and the iliac vein patency rate was found to be 100%, while superficial femoral vein insufficiency was in 5.6% (n=1), 11.1% (n=2), 16.2% (n=3), and 16.2% (n=3), respectively.Conclusion: Based on our findings, ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe and effective method for carefully selected patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis

Özet

Amaç: Derin ven trombozu hayatı tehdit eden bir patoloji olup uzun dönemde post-trombotik sendrom gibi morbiditelere sebep olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı popliteal veni açık olan ilio-femoral derin trombozu nedeniyle ultrason ile hızlandırılmış kateter aracılı tromboliz tedavisi yapılan hastaların erken ve orta dönem sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kasım 2014-Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında akut iliofemoral derin ven rombozu nedeniyle ultrason ile hızlandırılmış kateter aracılı tromboliz tedavisi uygulanan 18 hasta (11 erkek, 7 bayan; ortalama yaş 51,89±16,29 yıl) retrospektif kesitsel olarak planlanan çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların % 88,9 unda (16/18) komplet tromboliz, 2 hastada parsiyel tromboliz başarıyla sağlanmıştır. Pulmoner embolism gözlenmedi. Bir hastada kateter yerinde kanama gözlendi. Parsiyel lizis olan bir hastada altta yatan lezyon balon anjioplasti ile başarılı olarak tedavi edilmiştir. Hastane mortalitesi veya ciddi bir komplikasyon gözlenmemiştir. Ortalama takip süresi 31,56±3,35 aydır. Tüm hastaların ultrason bulguları, aynı deneyimli bir radyolog tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Dopler ultrasonografi kontrolleri girişim sonrası 1 ve 6. ay ile 1 ve 2. yılda yapılarak raporlanmıştır. İliak ven açıklık oranı % 100 saptandı. Fakat sırasıyla 5,6% (1 hasta), 11.1% (2 hasta),16,2% (3 hasta), 16,2% (3 hasta) yüzeyel femoral vende yetmezlik saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre, popliteal veni patent olup ilio-femoral derin ven trombozu olan dikkatli seçilmiş hastalarda ultrason ile hızlandırılmış kateter aracılı tromboliz tedavisi güvenli ve efektif bir metodtur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUBAT, E., ÜNAL, C. S., KESKİN, A., ÇETİN, E. (2019). Ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis without popliteal vein thrombosis: early and midterm results. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 347–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/56416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:698-707
  2. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2016;149:315-52
  3. Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. The post-thrombotic syndrome: Current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research. Blood Rev. 2002;16:155–65
  4. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Wolkener F, Mehrabi A, Mistry S, Büchler MW. Prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis in general surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;189:14–22
  5. Meissner MH, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Markel A, Strandness Jr DE. Deep venous insufficiency: the relationship between lysis and subsequent reflux. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:596-605
  6. Dumantepe M, Tarhan A, Yurdakul I, Ozler A. USaccelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;9:251-8
  7. Grommes J, Strijkers R, Greiner A, Mahnken AH, Wittens CH. Safety and feasibility of ultrasoundaccelerated catheterdirected thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:526-32
  8. Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DE. Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1449–62
  9. Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Sandset PM, Klow NE. Residual rates of reflux and obstruction and their correlation to post-thrombotic syndrome in a randomized study on catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2:123-30
  10. Karahan O, Kutas HB, Gurbuz O, Tezcan O, Caliskan A, Yavuz C et al. Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis with a rotator thrombolysis device in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Vascular. 2016;24:481-6
  11. Li W, Chuanlin Z, Shaoyu M, Yeh CH, Liqun C, Zeju Z. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018; 26:e2990
  12. Kim YA, Yang SS, Yun WS. Does catheter-directed thrombolysis prevent postthrombotic syndrome? Vasc Specialist Int. 2018;;34:26-30
  13. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Kahn SR, Julian J, Magnuson E, Jaff MR et al. Rationale and design of the ATTRACT Study: a multicenter random