Journals / Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

An examination of psycholinguistic variables among learners of Turkish

Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen öğrencilerin psikodilbilimsel değişkenler bakımından incelenmesi

Pages
294–307
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Possibilities for further research are also suggested to follow up some ofthe interesting questions raised by the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article describes a study into the multiple interacting factors which motivate learners of Turkish, the demandfor which has been steadily increasing given the geo-political realities of the region at this time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A questionnairewas used which examined motivation, investment, beliefs and autonomy on a rating scale of 1 (strongly disagree)to 5 (strongly agree).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Possibilities for further research are also suggested to follow up some ofthe interesting questions raised by the study.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article describes a study into the multiple interacting factors which motivate learners of Turkish, the demandfor which has been steadily increasing given the geo-political realities of the region at this time. A questionnairewas used which examined motivation, investment, beliefs and autonomy on a rating scale of 1 (strongly disagree)to 5 (strongly agree). In addition, a qualitative dimension was added by asking respondents to comment on theirreasons for their ratings and to give examples where they could. The participants were 402 students of Turkish atthe TÖMER center at a Turkish university. The highest ratings were for motivation and the belief that Turkish isa good language to learn (median rating=5). All of the other items of the questionnaire were given a median ratingof 4 (agree). Reasons given for the ratings included personal, educational or economic advancement, conflictavoidance, and a wide range of examples was also provided. The findings are discussed and compared with existingliterature, and implications are proposed. Possibilities for further research are also suggested to follow up some ofthe interesting questions raised by the study.

Özet

Bu çalışma yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen öğrencileri Türkçe öğrenmeye güdüleyen psiko-dilbilimsel çoklu değişkenleri incelemektedir. Özellikle son yıllarda jeopolitik konumundan dolayı Türkiye’nin her yıl artan bir şekilde yabancı öğrenci çekmesi Türkçe üzerine yapılan bu tür çalışmalara ihtiyacı ve talebi arttırmaktadır. Öğrencilerin güdülenme, yatırım, inanç ve özerklik seviyeleri beşli Likert ölçeği kullanılarak incelenmiş olup nicel verinin yanı sıra katılımcıların cevaplandırdığı yapılandırılmış açık uçlu sorularla nitel veri de toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar göstermiştir ki öğrencilerin güdülenme ve Türkçenin öğrenilmeye değer bir dil olduğu inancı seviyesi nicel olarak en yüksek bulunurken, nitel sonuçlar da öğrencilerin Türkçe öğrenmeyi tercih etmelerinin sebeplerini kişisel, eğitimsel, ekonomik refah ve savaştan vs. kaçınma gibi faktörler olarak ortaya koymuştur. Makalenin sonunda, çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında bulgular tartışılmış, gelecekte yapılması ihtiyaç duyulan çalışmaların yanı sıra bir dizi önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GRİFFİTHS, C., SORUC, A. (2022). An examination of psycholinguistic variables among learners of Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 294–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/564087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akkaya, A. (2013). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretimi kapsamında fıkralar: Nasreddin Hoca fıkraları. Milli Folklor, 25(100), 171-181.
  2. Anya, U. (2011). Connecting with communities of learners and speakers: Integrative ideals, experiences, and motivations of successful black second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 441-466.
  3. Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Barcelos, A. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 7-33). Netherlands: Kluwer. Barcelos, A. (2008). Learning English: Students’ beliefs and experiences in Brazil. In Kalaja, P., Menezes, V., & Barcelos, A. (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp. 35-48).
  4. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed). New York: Routledge Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2013). Towards a plurilingual approach in English language teaching: softening the boundaries between languages. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 591-599.
  5. Cohen, A., & Dörnyei. Z. (2002). Focus on the Language Learner: Motivation, Styles and Strategies. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp.170-190).
  6. London, UK: Edward Arnold. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edition). London & New York: Routledge. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36-56.
  7. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 13, (pp. 39-80). New York: Academic Press.
  8. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.) (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (2011). Exploring links between identity, motivation and autonomy. In Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 1- 8). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Gardner, R. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.
  10. Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. (1972). A