SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

İnfertil hastalarda over rezervinin değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of ovarian reserve in infertile patients

Ahmet ERDEM
Mehmet Fırat MUTLU
Pages
196–203
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, our aimwas to discuss the efficacy of ovarian reserve tests on predicting poorovarian response and treatment outcome in ART patients.(J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 196-203)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diminished ovarian reserve is a more common occurrence as morewomen postpone childbearing in modern societies due to social anddemographic trends.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Proper prediction of ovarian reserve before initiation of the treat ment can decrease cycle cancellations, help clinicians to establishalternative treatment options (i.e.oocyte donation) for poor prognosispatients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, our aimwas to discuss the efficacy of ovarian reserve tests on predicting poorovarian response and treatment outcome in ART patients.(J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 196-203)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Diminished ovarian reserve is a more common occurrence as morewomen postpone childbearing in modern societies due to social anddemographic trends. Diminished ovarian reserve is one of the pri mary reasons for poor ART outcome. Due to high costs, side effectsand heavy burden on patients on ART treatments, patient selectionand counseling for prognosis is an important aspect before startingART. Proper prediction of ovarian reserve before initiation of the treat ment can decrease cycle cancellations, help clinicians to establishalternative treatment options (i.e.oocyte donation) for poor prognosispatients. However, indicators of ovarian reserve are not fully success ful in predicting the outcome of the treatment. In this review, our aimwas to discuss the efficacy of ovarian reserve tests on predicting poorovarian response and treatment outcome in ART patients.(J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 196-203)

Özet

Günümüzde modern toplumlarda kadınların evliliklerini çeşitli nedenlerle geciktirmesi nedeniyle düşük over rezervi ile daha sık karşılaşılmaktadır. ART tedavisi sırasında düşük over reservi başarıyı azaltan başlıca nedenlerden birisidir. Tedavilerin maliyeti, yan etkileri, hasta açısından zorlukları göz önüne alındığında uygun hasta seçimi ve uygun prognoz belirlenmesinin oldukça önemli olduğu görülmektedir. Tedavi öncesi ovaryen yanıtın öngörülmesi ile yetersiz ovaryen yanıt nedeniyle siklus iptalleri azaltılabilmekte; aynı zamanda hekime uygun tedavi stratejileri geliştirme ve kötü prognozlu hastaları alteratif yöntemlere (oosit donasyonu) yöneltmeyi sağlayabilmektedir. Günümüzde bu amaçla kullanılan birçok belirteç mevcuttur. Ancak bu belirteçler tedaviye verilen yanıt hakkında fikir verse de hiç birisi tek başına tedavi başarısını göstermede tam güvenilir değildir. Bu derlemede ART tedavisi alan hastalarda kötü ovaryen yanıtı ve başarıyı ön görmede kullanılan over rezerv testlerinin etkinliği tartışılmaktadır. (J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 196-203)

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, A., MUTLU, M. F. (2022). İnfertil hastalarda over rezervinin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 196–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/563999

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive age- ing. Hum Reprod Update 2002: 8; 141-54. [CrossRef] Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science 1986; 233: 1389-94. [CrossRef] O’Connor KA, Holman DJ, Wood JW. Declining fecundity and ovcarian ageing in natural fertility populations. Maturitas 1998: 30; 127-36. [CrossRef] Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med 1982: 306; 404-6. [CrossRef] van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, Habbena JDF, te Velde ER, Karbaat J. Delaying child-bearing: effect of age on fecundi- ty and outcome of pregnancy. Br Med J 1991: 302; 1361-5 [CrossRef] Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular develoment in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev 1996; 17: 121-55. [CrossRef] Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: Implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 1342-6.
  2. Hsueh AJW, Billig H, Tsafriri A. Ovarian follicle atresia: a hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr Rev 1994; 15: 707-24. [CrossRef] Treloar AE. Menstrual cyclicity and the premenopause. Maturitas 1981; 3: 49-64. [CrossRef] van Zonneveld P, Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, te Velde ER. Hormones and reproductive aging. Maturitas 2001; 38: 83-94. [CrossRef] van Noord PA, Dubas JS, Dorland M, Boersma H, te Velde E. Age at natural menopause in a population-based screening cohort: the role of menarche. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 95-102. [CrossRef] Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Aging and infertility in women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 215-9. [CrossRef] Silber Z, Nagy Z, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC. The effect of female age and ovarian reserve on pregnancy rate in male infertility: treatment of azoospermia with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 2693-700. [CrossRef] Sauer MV. The impact of age on reproductive potential: Lessons learned from oocyte donation. Maturitas 1998: 30; 221-5. [CrossRef] Hansen JP. Older maternal age and pregnancy outcome: A review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1986; 41: 726-42. [CrossRef] O’Connor KA, Holman DJ, Wood JW. Declining fecundity and ovarian ageing in natural fertility populations. Maturitas 1998; 30: 127-36. [CrossRef] Andersen N, Wohlfahrt J, Chri