Journals / Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

An analysis of innovative Lean Method in foreign language learning

Yenilikçi Yalın Yöntemin yabancı dil öğreniminde incelenmesi

Pages
405–417
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within thecontext of the study, the students’ attitudes and opinions towards innovative Lean Educational method wererevealed and some recommendations were developed for especially language teachers and researchers.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The question of how to teach and learn English has been the preoccupation of many scholars of English LanguageTeaching for more than a century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study ismainly focused on using quantitative design conducted with 975 students and participants were randomly selectedfrom 3 universities, 5 high schools, 2 middle schools and 1 primary school in Turkey and Iraq in order to analyzethe suitability of English instruction from the perspective of learners towards innovative lean method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within thecontext of the study, the students’ attitudes and opinions towards innovative Lean Educational method wererevealed and some recommendations were developed for especially language teachers and researchers.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The question of how to teach and learn English has been the preoccupation of many scholars of English LanguageTeaching for more than a century. Since the emergence of grammar translation method, researchers, teachers, andacademicians have been trying to find the best method for their learners. In other words, this process can be definedas a century of questioning. In fact, some of the methods have been successful to some extend in the mastery oflanguage, but most of them unfortunately cannot even reach the promised lands of the fruitful learning, and noneof them were completely suitable for all types of the learners. There are several reasons behind this problem, andone of them could be the students’ contribution in the creation of these methods. It has been rarely questioned thathow students feel about these methods employed in English classes, despite the fact that these methods, namelyinnovations, have been created for the purpose of students’ mastery of foreign language learning. This study ismainly focused on using quantitative design conducted with 975 students and participants were randomly selectedfrom 3 universities, 5 high schools, 2 middle schools and 1 primary school in Turkey and Iraq in order to analyzethe suitability of English instruction from the perspective of learners towards innovative lean method. Within thecontext of the study, the students’ attitudes and opinions towards innovative Lean Educational method wererevealed and some recommendations were developed for especially language teachers and researchers.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

Özet

İngilizce öğretme ve öğrenme sorusu bir asırdan fazladır İngiliz Dili Eğitimi akademisyenlerinin meşguliyeti haline gelmiştir. Dilbilgisi-Çeviri Yöntemi’nin ortaya çıkışından bu yana araştırmacılar, öğretmenler ve akademisyenler öğrencileri için en iyi yöntemi bulmaya çalışmıştır. Diğer bir deyişle, bu süreç bir asırlık sorgulama olarak tanımlanabilir. Aslında, bazı yöntemler dil yeterliliğinde belli bir miktarda başarılı olmuşlardır; ancak bunların birçoğu verimli öğrenmenin bereketli topraklarına ulaşamamıştır ve bunların hiçbiri her çeşit öğrenci tamamen uygun değildir. Bu sorunun arkasında birkaç neden vardır ve bunlardan biri öğrencilerin bu yöntemlerin yaratılmasına katkısı olabilir. Bu yöntemlerin, yani yeniliklerin, öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenimine hâkim olması amacıyla yaratılmış olmalarına rağmen, öğrencilerin İngilizce derslerinde kullanılan bu yöntemler hakkında nasıl hissettikleri nadiren sorgulanmıştır. Bu araştırma temel olarak nicel deseni kullanarak Türkiye ve Irak’taki 3 üniversite, 5 lise, 2 ortaokul ve 1 ilkokuldan rastlantısal olarak seçilen 975 öğrencinin bakış açısından yenilikçi yalın yönteme yönelik İngilizce öğretiminin uygunluğunu analiz etmek için tasarlanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında öğrencilerin yenilikçi Yalın Eğitim yöntemine yönelik tutum ve görüşleri ortaya konmuş ve özellikle yabancı dil öğretmenleri ve araştırmacılar için bazı öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tılfarlıoğlu, F. Y. (2022). An analysis of innovative Lean Method in foreign language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 405–417. https://ajindex.com/articles/563889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afshar, H. S., & Bagherieh, M. (2014). An Evaluation of Grammar and Vocabulary ConsciousnessRaising Activities in Current ELT Materials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 109-113.
  2. Arkoudis, S. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 415-433.
  3. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  4. Bailey, K. (2001). Action research, teacher research, and classroom research in language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rded., pp.489-499). New York: Heinle & Heinle. Bell, D. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really so incompatible? TESOL Quarterly, 37,325- 336. Broughton, G, Brumfit, C. Flavell, R. Hill, P., and Pincas, A.(2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. USA: Taylor and Faranchise e-library. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.NewYork: Pearson. Cleary, B. A., & Duncan, S. J. (1997). Tools and techniques to inspire classroom learning. ASQC Quality Press.
  5. Cleary, B. A., & Duncan, S. J. (2008). Thinking tools for kids: An activity book for classroom learning.ASQ Quality Press.
  6. Connell, D. (2005). Brain-based strategies to reach every learner: Surveys, questionnaires, and checklists that help you identify students' strengths-plus engaging brain-based lessons and activities teaching strategies Washington.DC: Teaching Strategies. Creese, A. (2002). The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 597-616.
  7. Davidson, C. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing right? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 454-475.
  8. Dennis, P. (2007). Getting the right things done: a leader's guide to planning and execution. Lean Enterprise Institute. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2005). Professional learning communities at work tm: best practices for enhancing students’ achievement. Solution Tree Press.
  9. Eaker, R., & DuFour, R. (2015). Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities. Solution Tree Press.
  10. Ewy, R (2009). Stakeholder-driven strategic planning in education: A practical guide for developing and deploying successful long-range plans. ASQ Quality Press. Fit