Journals / Journal of FisheriesSciences.com / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Cladocera and copepoda fauna of Aslantaş Dam Lake (Osmaniye-Turkey)

Pages
285–297
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since this study is the very first study carried out on the zooplankton of Aslantaş Dam Lake, all of the species observed are the first reports for Aslantaş Dam Lake.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quantitative and qualitative examinations of zooplankton in Aslantaş Dam Lake were studied between April 2001 and March 2002.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was established that total zooplankton in the reservoir is being represented with 18 species belonging to Cladocera and Copepoda.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since this study is the very first study carried out on the zooplankton of Aslantaş Dam Lake, all of the species observed are the first reports for Aslantaş Dam Lake.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative examinations of zooplankton in Aslantaş Dam Lake were studied between April 2001 and March 2002. It was established that total zooplankton in the reservoir is being represented with 18 species belonging to Cladocera and Copepoda. Number of the species belonging to cladocer and copepod are 14 and 4, respectively. Contrary to the number of species, abundance was found to be in favor of copepods (65.99% of total zooplankton). Remaining one third of total zooplankton (34.01%) was cladocerans. The most abundant species were determined as Bosmina longirostris among cladocerans and Thermocyclops vermifer persicus (Lindberg, 1936) among copepods. Monthly depth of light penetration zone (photic zone) was calculated using Secchi disk readings. It was observed that the copepods were more abundant than the cladocerans in the light penetration zone (photic zone). Beyond the light penetration zone the situation was reversed and the cladocerans were found to be more abundant than the copepods. Chlorophyll-a level was also examined in the lake. Since this study is the very first study carried out on the zooplankton of Aslantaş Dam Lake, all of the species observed are the first reports for Aslantaş Dam Lake.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, A., ALTUN, A., GÖKSU, M. Z. L. (2022). Cladocera and copepoda fauna of Aslantaş Dam Lake (Osmaniye-Turkey). Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 285–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/563309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Altındağ, A., Özkurt, Ş., (1998). A Study on the zooplantonic fauna of the Dam Lakes Kunduzlar and Çatören (Kırka-Eskişehir), Turkish journal of Zoology, 22: 323–331.
  2. APHA. (1995). Standard Methods for the examination of water and waste water 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC. Bozkurt, A., Göksu, M.Z.L., (1997). Seyhan Baraj Gölü (Adana) Copepoda ve Cladocera (Crustacea) faunası. Biyologlar Derneği, III. Ulusal Ekoloi ve Çevre Kongresi, 3-5
  3. Eylül, Kırşehir. Cirik, S., Cirik, Ş., (1991). Limnoloji (Ders Kitabı). Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Yüksekokulu Yayınları No; 21, 166. Cole,G.A., (1983). Textbook of Limnology. Third edition, the C.V. Mosby Company, 401. Dodson, S.I., Frey, D.G., (1991). Cladoceran and other Branchiopoda. 723-786 in Thorp, J.H., and A.P. Covich (eds.). Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego. DSİ, (1966).
  4. Ceyhan Aslantaş Projesi, Aşağı Ceyhan Geliştirilmesi Teknik ve Ekonomik Fizibilite Raporu, Adana. DSİ, (2000). Balıklandırma Çalışma Raporları. DSİ Seyhan Su Ürünleri Araştırma ve Üretim İstasyonu (Basılmamış), Adana. Dussart, B., (1969). Les Copepodes des Eaux Continentales d’Europe Occidentale Tale II. Cyclopoides et Biologie N Boubee et Cie. Paris, 221. Edmondson, W.T., (1959). Methods and Equiment in Freshwater biology 2nd ed. John Willey and Sons. Inc., NewYork, 1194-1202.
  5. Kolisko, R.A., (1974). Plankton Rotifers Biology and Taxonomy. Biological Station Lunz of the Austrian Academy of Science, Stutgart, 146. Kiefer, F., Fryer, G., (1978). Das Zooplankton der Binnengewasser 2 Teil. E Schweizerbart Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 380. Moss, B., (1988). Ecology of Freshwaters: Man and Medium. Second Edition, Blackwell Scient. Publ., 417. Mathev, P.M., (1979). Studies on the Zooplankton of a Tropical Lake. Central Inland Fisheries Fauna, India. Noges, T., (1997). Zooplankton-Phytoplankton Interactions in Lakes Vortsjarv, Peipsi (Estonia) and Yaskhan (Turkmenia). Hydrobiologia, 342/343: 175-184.
  6. Horppila, J., (1997). Diurnal Changes in the Vertical Distribution of Cladocerans in a Biomanipulated Lake, Hydrobiologia, 345: 215- 220. Horne, A.J., Goldman, C.R., (1994). Limnology. McGrow –Hill press United States of America. 133. Pennak, R.W., (1978). Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York, 803. Tsalolikhin, S.J., (1995). Key to freshwater invertebrates of Russia and adjacent lands. St Petersburg, 627. Ustaoğlu, M. R., Akyürek, M., (