Journals / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Effects of different local haemostatic agents on facial swelling after the third molar surgery

Pages
7–11
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study has shown that the haemostatic local agents do not have any significant effect in the facial edema.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was aimed to investigate the effects of three different local haemostatic agents (oxidized regenerated cellulose, gelatin sponge and collagen sponge) on the facial swelling after surgical removal of impacted the third mandibular molar teeth, in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty-six healthy patients (mean age, 21.21±3.14 years) requiring bilateral impacted third molar extractions were included in this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study has shown that the haemostatic local agents do not have any significant effect in the facial edema.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gelatin sponge · Facial swelling · Local haemostatic agents

Abstract

It was aimed to investigate the effects of three different local haemostatic agents (oxidized regenerated cellulose, gelatin sponge and collagen sponge) on the facial swelling after surgical removal of impacted the third mandibular molar teeth, in this study. Sixty-six healthy patients (mean age, 21.21±3.14 years) requiring bilateral impacted third molar extractions were included in this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study. All teeth were removed bilaterally in the same operation by one surgeon. The left side of the mandible served as the test side for local haemostasis and the right side as the controlside in all patients. After removal, the primary closure of surgical wound was provided with silk sutures, in the control side. One of the absorbable haemostatic agents, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), gelatin sponge (GS) and collagen sponge (CS) was placed in the extraction cavities following gauze packing for 5 minutes to prevent bleeding and after that the wound was sutured. Data was collected regarding the operating time, mouth opening, and facial swelling. Facial swelling was measured by “point counting technique” on standard posteroanterior skull radiographs. The comparisons of differences belonging to ORC, GS and CS applications on preoperative and postoperative edema showed that the differences were not statistically significant according to analysis ofvariance (ANOVA) (p>0.05). This study has shown that the haemostatic local agents do not have any significant effect in the facial edema.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEREKET, C., METİN, M., TEK, M., ŞENER, İ., ALKAN, A., ARICI, S. (2022). Effects of different local haemostatic agents on facial swelling after the third molar surgery. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/563085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Absi, E.G., Shepherd, J.P., 1993. A comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methods. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 22, 149-153. doi:10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80240-1.
  2. Alkan, A., Metin, M., Arici, S., Sener, I., 2004. A prospective randomised cross-over study of the effect of local haemostasis after third molar surgery on facial swelling: an exploratory trial. Br. Dent. J. 197, 42-44. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811421. Amin, M.M., Laskin, D.M., 1983. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 55, 448-451.
  3. Aras, M.H., Güngörmüs, M., 2010. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)-- intraoral and extraoral on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar. Lasers. Med. Sci. 25, 641-645. 10.1007/s10103-009-0684-1.
  4. Arteagoitia, I., Diez, A., Barbier, L., Santamaría, G., Santamaría, J., 2005. Efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in preventing infectious and inflammatory complications following impacted mandibular third molar extraction. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 100, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.025. Brabander, E.C., Cattaneo, G., 1988. The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 17, 119-121.
  5. Danda, A.K., Krishna, Tatiparthi, M., Narayanan, V., Siddareddi A., 2010. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling a comparative and split mouth study. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 68, 309-312. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.060. Dubois, D.D., Pizer, M.E., Chinnis, R.J., 1982. Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 40, 631-634. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(82)90111-2.
  6. Esen, E., Taşar, F., Akhan, O., 1999. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg, 57, 1201-1206. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90486-X. Forsgren, H., Heimdahl, A., Johansson, B., Krekmanov, L., 1985. Effect of application of cold dressings on the postoperative course in oral surgery. Int. J. Oral. M