SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

A Numerical Application of Ship Parametric Roll under Second Generation Stability Criteria

Yeni Nesil Stabilite Kriterleri Çerçevesinde Parametrik Yalpa Hareketi için Sayısal bir Uygulama

Ferdi ÇAKICI
Pages
242–251
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on C2 assessmentprocedure which is calculated as an average of values of different Froude numbers and wave directions, it isfound that the benchmark hull C11 was not vulnerable for the parametric roll resonance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the parametric roll motion for the benchmark container ship form C11 is investigated by usingthe second generation stability criteria, which were intensively studied by IMO (International MaritimeOrganization).
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the IMO regulations, vulnerability criteria range between 1 and 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on C2 assessmentprocedure which is calculated as an average of values of different Froude numbers and wave directions, it isfound that the benchmark hull C11 was not vulnerable for the parametric roll resonance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the parametric roll motion for the benchmark container ship form C11 is investigated by usingthe second generation stability criteria, which were intensively studied by IMO (International MaritimeOrganization). According to the IMO regulations, vulnerability criteria range between 1 and 3. While level1 is only dependent on ship geometry and speed, level 3 is required to perform direct stability assessmentwith reliable robust software. The application of level 1 is considerably easy yet it is extremely conservative.Therefore, in the present study, level 2 application is performed that is less conservative than level 1 and easierthan level 3. Parametric roll motion is analysed based on GM variation technique. Based on C2 assessmentprocedure which is calculated as an average of values of different Froude numbers and wave directions, it isfound that the benchmark hull C11 was not vulnerable for the parametric roll resonance.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, IMO (Uluslararası Denizcilik Organizasyonu) tarafından yoğun bir şekilde çalışılan yeni nesil stabilite kriterlerinin kullanımı ile referans konteyner gemisi formu C11 için parametrik yalpa hareketi araştırılmıştır. IMO kurallarında göre zafiyet kriteri 1 ve 3. seviye arasında değişmektedir. Seviye 1 uygulaması sadece gemi geometrisine ve hızına bağlı iken, seviye 3 uygulaması güvenilir sağlam yazılımlarla doğrudan stabilite değerlendirmesi yapılmasını gerektirir. Seviye 1’in uygulaması oldukça kolaydır fakat bu seviye aşırı derecede tutucudur. Bu sebeple, mevcut çalışmada uygulaması seviye 1’e kıyasla daha az tutucu ve seviye 3’e göre daha kolay olan seviye 2 uygulanmıştır. Parametrik yalpa değerlendirmesi GM varyasyon yaklaşımı ile elde edilmiştir. Değişik gemi hızları ve dalga yönlerine dayalı olan C2 hesabı kullanılarak yapılan değerlendirme ile mevcut gemi formunun parametrik yalpa rezonansı için zayıf olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKICI, F. (2022). A Numerical Application of Ship Parametric Roll under Second Generation Stability Criteria. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 242–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/562848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Belenky, V. L, Bassler, C.C and Spyrou,K.J. (2011). Development of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria, Part 2: Vulnerability Criteria for Parametric Roll
  2. Sheikh, I.A (2008). Parametric Roll Instability of Ships. Thesis for The Degree Of Master of Science. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo
  3. Kerwin, J.E. (1955). Notes on Rolling in Longitudinal Waves. In Proceedings of International Shipbuilding Progress
  4. Paulling, J.R., and Rosenberg, R.M. (1959). On Unstable Ship Motion Resulting from Non linear Coupling. Journal of Ship Research, 3(1): 36–46
  5. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (1995). Guidance to the Master for Avoiding Dangerous Situations in Following and Quartering Seas
  6. France, W.M., Levadou, M., Treakle, T.W., Pauling, J.R., Michel, K. and Moore, C. (2003). An investigation of head-sea parametric rolling and its influence on container lashing systems. Marine Technology, 40(1): 1-19
  7. Uzunoglu E., Silva, S.R and Soares, G.C. (2015). Numerical and experimental study of parametric rolling of a container ship in regular and irregular head waves. Maritime Technology and Engineering. Guedes Soares & Santos (Eds) Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02727-5
  8. Shin, Y.S. Belenky, V.L Pauling, J.R., Weems, K.M. and Lin W.M. (2004). Criteria for parametric roll of large container ships in longitudinal seas. SNAME Annual Meeting, Washington DC
  9. Cummins, W.E. (1962). The impulse response function and ship motions. Schiffstechnik, 47(9):101-109
  10. Ballard, E.J. Hudson, D.A. Price, W.G. and Temarel, P.,(2003). Time domain simulation of symmetric ship motions in waves. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 145(2):89-103
  11. Spanos, D. and Papanikolaou, A. (2007). Numerical simulation of parametric roll in head seas. International Shipbuilding Progress. 54: 249-267
  12. Kim,T. and Kim, Y. (2011). Multilevel approach for parametric roll analysis. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 3:53-64
  13. Peşman, E.(2016). Influence of Variable Acceleration on Parametric Roll Motion of a Container Ship. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 4(3): 205-214
  14. Umeda,N., Sakai M., Fujita,N., Morimoto A., Terada, D. and Matsuda, A. (2016). Numerical prediction of parametric roll in oblique waves. Ocean Engineering, 120:212-219
  15. Lee, J.H. and Kim Y. (2017). Study on added resista