SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

A Qualitative Research on Ship Investments in Turkey

Türkiye'deki Gemi Yatırımları Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma

Ersin Fırat AKGÜL
İsmail Bilge ÇETİN
Pages
228–241
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings reveals that market conditionsand timing, payback period of the investment, technical features of the ship and profile, financing capacityand risk perception of investors have been identified as important criteria in ship investments in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ship investments including high amount of capital and high risk compared with other investment alternativesare important in the business life of a shipping firm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, comprehending dynamics on ship investmentsis essential.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings reveals that market conditionsand timing, payback period of the investment, technical features of the ship and profile, financing capacityand risk perception of investors have been identified as important criteria in ship investments in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ship investments including high amount of capital and high risk compared with other investment alternativesare important in the business life of a shipping firm. Therefore, comprehending dynamics on ship investmentsis essential. The motive of this study rests on this fact and it is aimed to determine the factors affecting shipinvestments of Turkish ship investors. In this context, a qualitative examination is employed to understand thenature of ship investments from the perspectives of professionals who have close relations with ship investorsin Turkey and who are able to evaluate them in an objective manner. Findings reveals that market conditionsand timing, payback period of the investment, technical features of the ship and profile, financing capacityand risk perception of investors have been identified as important criteria in ship investments in Turkey.

Özet

Yüksek miktarda sermaye gerektiren ve diğer yatırım alternatiflerine kıyasla yüksek risk içeren gemi yatırımları, denizcilik işletmeleri için oldukça önemlidir. Bu nedenle, gemi yatırımlarındaki dinamikleri anlamak önem arz etmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, Türk gemi yatırımcılarının gemi yatırımlarını etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye'deki gemi yatırımcıları ile yakın ilişkileri olan ve söz konusu yatırımcıları objektif olarak değerlendirebilecek profesyonellerin bakış açılarına yönelik nitel bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular; Türkiye'de yatırım yapılacak gemi yatırımlarının değerlendirilmesinde; piyasa şartları ve zamanlama, yatırımın geri ödeme süresi, geminin teknik özellikleri ile yatırımcı profili, finansman kapasitesi ve risk algısının gemi yatırımlarında öne çıkan faktörler olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜL, E. F., ÇETİN, İ. B. (2022). A Qualitative Research on Ship Investments in Turkey. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 228–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/562842

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Scarsi, R. (2007). The bulk shipping business: Market cycles and shipowners' biases. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(6): 577-590
  2. Kavussonos, M., and Alizadeh, A. (2002). Efficient pricing of ships in the dry bulk sector of the shipping industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3): 303-330
  3. Chou,H.,andChen,D.(2017).Theuseof technical analysis in sale-and-purchase transactions of secondhand ships. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 1-18, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/ s41278-017-0096-2 [4] Duru, O. (2013). Irrational exuberance, overconfidence and short termism: Knowledge to action asymmetry in shipping asset management. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(1): 43-58
  4. Bendall,H., and Stent,A.(2007). Maritime investment strategies with a portfolio of real options. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(5): 441-452
  5. Bendall,H.,andStent,A.(2003).Investment strategies in market uncertainty. Maritime Policy& Management, 30(4): 293-303
  6. Fan,L., andLuo,M.(2013).Analyzing ship investment behaviour in liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(6): 511-533
  7. Merikas, A.G., Sigalas, C. and Drobetz, W. (2011). The shipping corporate risk trade-off hypothesis. Marine Money International. 27(6): 40-43
  8. IMEAK Deniz Ticaret Odası Deniz Ticareti Dergisi. (2019). IMEAK DTO Mart Ayı Meclis Toplantı Raporu. Date of Access: 05 April 2019. https:// www.denizticaretodasi.org.tr/dergi/ Sayfalar/Deniz-Ticareti-Dergisi. aspx?YIL=2019&SAYI=4 [10] Celik Girgin, S., Karlis, T. and Nguyen,H-O. (2018). A critical review of the literature on firm-leveltheories on ship investment. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1): 1-19
  9. Dikos, G., and Marcus, H. (2003). The term structure of second-hand prices: A structural partial equilibrium model. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(3): 251-267
  10. Alizadeh, A., and Nomikos, N. (2007). Investment timing and trading strategies in the sale and purchase market for ships. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(1): 126-143
  11. Alizadeh, A., and Nomikos, N. (2006). Trading strategies in the market for tankers. Maritime Policy & Management, 33(2): 119-140
  12. Yin, J., Wu, Y., & Lu, L.(2018). Assessment of investment decision in the dry bulk shipping market based on real options thinking and the shipping cycle perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(3): 330-343
  13. Alizadeh, A.H. and Nomikos, N.K. (2003). The price-volume relationship in the sale and purchase market for dry b