Meteorological Risk Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic Systems for Maritime

Key Findings & Data:Supported by ANFIS, the meteorological risk assessment system has demonstrated that the database contains details of over 180 marine casualty information involving navigation and traffic accidents.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Decision support system, Fuzzy logic, Maritime accident dataset, Meteorological risk assessment, Ship navigation safety

🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years, numerous casualties have been associated with a lack of safe navigation of ships. Despite advanced navigation systems and the implementation of safety management systems onboard ships, maritime safety is still one of the major concerns for the shipping industry. This research proposes a proactive modeling approach that utilizes Fuzzy Logic and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). The model primarily provides continuous meteorological risk assessment for ships to improve marine navigational safety. In the study, Wind Speed, Sea Conditions, Visibility, and Day/Night Ratio are converted to meteorological risk factors using meteorological risk assessment system. Supported by ANFIS, the meteorological risk assessment system has demonstrated that the database contains details of over 180 marine casualty information involving navigation and traffic accidents. The results emphasize that environmental factors, as well as the Day/Night Ratio, significantly influence ship navigational safety. Hence, a meteorological risk assessment system can enhance navigational safety and prevent loss of life in the shipping industry. As a result, a meteorological risk assessment framework has enormous potential for preventing accidents and improving the safety and sustainability of the shipping industry. In this regard, the proposed model is a one-of-a-kind framework that will be extremely useful for mitigating and preventing the effects of maritime accidents. Keywords: Decision support system, Fuzzy logic, Maritime accident dataset, Meteorological risk assessment, Ship navigation safety

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, İ., SONER, Ö., SARAÇOĞLU, R. (2022). Meteorological Risk Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic Systems for Maritime. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 97–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/562817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

K. Malde, N. O. Handegard, L. Eikvil, and A. B. Salberg, “Machine intelligence and the data-driven future of marine science,” Ices Journal of Marine Science, vol. 77, pp. 1274-1285 July-August [2] W. Tann, and H. J. Shaw, “Constructing web-based object-oriented design support system for collaborative ship modeling,” Marine Technology and Sname News, vol. 44, pp. 139-150, 2007. [3] K. Wrobel, J. Montewka, and P. Kujala, “Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 165, pp. 155-169, Sep 2017. [4] Wang, S.B., Y.J. Zhang, and L.B. Li, A collision avoidance decisionmaking system for autonomous ship based on modified velocity obstacle method. Ocean Engineering, vol. 215, pp. 107910, Nov 2020. [5] S. Hu, Q. Fang, H. Xia, and Y. Xi, “Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, pp. 369-377, Mar 2007. [6] Y. Huang, and P. van Gelder, “Collision risk measure for triggering evasive actions of maritime autonomous surface ships,” Safety Science, vol. 127, pp. 104708, July 2020. [7] J.-F. Balmat, F. Lafont, R. Maifret, and N. Pessel, “Maritime risk assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 1278-1286, Nov 2009. [8] Balmat, J.-F., et al., A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment. Ocean Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 171-176, Jan 2011. 9] G. K. Silber et al., “The role of the International Maritime Organization in reducing vessel threat to whales: Process, options, action and effectiveness,” Marine Policy, vol. 36, pp. 1221-1233, Nov 2012. [10] U. Ozturk, and K. Cicek, “Individual collision risk assessment in ship navigation: A systematic literature review,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 180, pp. 130-143, May 2019. [11] A. Toffoli, J. M. Lefèvre, E. Bitner-Gregersen, and J. Monbaliu, “Towards the identification of warning criteria: Analysis of a ship accident database,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 27, pp. 281-291, Dec 2005. [12] B. Wu, T. L. Yip, X. Yan, C. G. Soares, “Fuzzy logic based approach for ship-bridge collision alert system,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 187, pp. 106152, Sep 2019. [13] Y. Hu, and G.-K. Park, “Collision risk assessment based on the vulnerability of marine accidents using fuzzy logic,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 541-551, 2020. [14] S.-L. Kao, K.-T