Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping

Pages
2–15
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Competitor liner operators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the maritime supply chain ecosystem can utilize the outcomes of this research to mitigate the bankruptcy risk and improve the maritime supply chain resilience capacity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The vital role of container liner shipping in international trade suggests that understanding why container liner firms go bankrupt is crucial to the sustainability of the maritime supply chain to improve resilience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A sensitivity analysis is conducted to increase the accuracy of the findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Competitor liner operators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the maritime supply chain ecosystem can utilize the outcomes of this research to mitigate the bankruptcy risk and improve the maritime supply chain resilience capacity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The vital role of container liner shipping in international trade suggests that understanding why container liner firms go bankrupt is crucial to the sustainability of the maritime supply chain to improve resilience. Considering the insolvency of Hanjin Shipping as a case study, this paper investigates the probabilistic relationships among the bankruptcy causal factors that are disclosed qualitatively and quantitatively, exploiting a fuzzy Bayes network approach. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to increase the accuracy of the findings. Outcomes of the paper reveal that an integrated approach comprising of both endogenous and exogenous causal factors is a more powerful approach to explain the demise of Hanjin Shipping. Compared to exogenous factors, endogenous factors account more for the collapse of the firm. Furthermore, it is found that government support would have been a more influential measure to mitigate the negative effects of the demise compared to the merging and acquisition practice. Competitor liner operators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the maritime supply chain ecosystem can utilize the outcomes of this research to mitigate the bankruptcy risk and improve the maritime supply chain resilience capacity.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMAL, B., AYDIN, M. (2022). Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 2–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/562816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. A. Ergin, and M. F. Ergin. “The role of antifouling coating in the marine industry.” Research & Reviews in Engineering, 53
  2. Review of Maritime Transport, 2020
  3. Review of Maritime Transport, 2021
  4. Z. Li and B. Dong. “A Game Theory Analysis of China’s Maritime Cross-Border Insolvency Policy: From the Perspective of Hanjin Shipping’s Bankruptcy Case.” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 48, pp. 419-31, Jun 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/030888 39.2020.1779366. [5] “Hanjin: Final Curtain Falls On Shipping Saga”. 2021. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38953144. [6] “Global Trade Review”. Nov/Dec 2016. https://fhr. rapidratings.com/hubfs/Global%20Trade%20Review. pdf?t=1481914337944
  5. J. Sheppard, and S. D. Chowdhury. “Riding the wrong wave: organizational failure as a failed turnaround.” Long Range Planning, vol. 38, pp. 239-60, June 2005
  6. H. Ooghe, and S. D. Prijcker. “Failure processes and causes of company bankruptcy: a typology.” Management Decision, vol. 46 pp. 223-42, March 2008
  7. M. Eling, and R. Jia. “Business failure, efficiency, and volatility: evidence from the European insurance industry” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 59, pp. 58-76, Oct 2018
  8. Y. Shi, and X. Li. “An overview of bankruptcy prediction models for corporate firms: a systematic literature review.” Intangible Capital, vol. 15, pp. 114-27, Oct 2019
  9. J. Amankwah-Amoah, R. E. Hinson, B. Honyenuga, and Y. Lu. “Accounting for the transitions after entrepreneurial business failure: an emerging market perspective” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 50 pp. 148-58, Sep 2019
  10. C. Th. Grammenos, N. K. Nomikos, and N. C. Papapostolou. “Estimating the probability of default for shipping high yield bond issues.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 44, pp. 1123-38, Nov 2008
  11. R. Adland, and H. Jia. “Charter market default risk: a conceptual approach” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics And Transportation Review, vol. 44, pp. 152-63, Jan 2008
  12. H. Yeo, “Solvency and liquidity in shipping companies.” Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 32, pp. 235-41, Dec 2016
  13. J. Haider, Z. Ou, and S. Pettit. “Predicting corporate failure for listed shipping companies.” Maritime Economics and Logistics, vol. 21 pp. 415-38, Feb 2018
  14. J. Pauli and M. Wolf. 2017. “Hanjin Shipping: Slow-Steaming into Bankruptcy Causes and Effects.” https://gupea.ub.gu.se/ bitstream/2077/52799