Journals / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Determination of Association Between the Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses to Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Pages
304–310
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: It was found that the mean age of the nurses was 32.5 ± 3.41, and 65.2% did not receive any training for pressure ulcers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the nurses’ level of knowledge and attitudes toward prevention Main title Can you make a larger font? (Like Introduction)of pressure sores.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2018 with 164 nurses working in a state hospital in Lefkoşa, Kıbrıs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: It was found that the mean age of the nurses was 32.5 ± 3.41, and 65.2% did not receive any training for pressure ulcers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the nurses’ level of knowledge and attitudes toward prevention Main title Can you make a larger font? (Like Introduction)of pressure sores. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2018 with 164 nurses working in a state hospital in Lefkoşa, Kıbrıs. All nurses who accept to participate in the study are taken into analysis. The data were collected by using “Nurse Identification Form,” “Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument,” and “Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool.” One-way analysis of variance, independent sample t-test, and Pearson correlation test were used for data analysis. Results: It was found that the mean age of the nurses was 32.5 ± 3.41, and 65.2% did not receive any training for pressure ulcers. The total score of the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument was 35.14 ± 3.55 (67%) and the level of knowledge was found to be partially sufficient. It was found that the nurses who participated in the study had positive attitudes toward pressure ulcer prevention in general. According to the Pressure Ulcer Knowl- edge Assessment Tool, the knowledge level of the participants was found to be partially sufficient. In addition, there was a positive and good correlation between the mean scores of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool and Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument (r = 0.75, P < .05). Conclusion: It was determined that knowledge level of nurses to prevent pressure ulcer was not sufficient and attitude scores were low. It was suggested that nurses should take information-raising initiatives and wound care nurses should be trained for counseling.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bahar, A., Kocaçal, E., Balan, S. (2022). Determination of Association Between the Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses to Pressure Ulcer Prevention. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 304–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/562609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Gül Ş. Prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing surgery. Ha- cettepe Üniversitesi Hemsirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;1(3):54-61
  2. Çınar F, Kula Şahin S, Eti Aslan F. Evaluation of studies in Turkey on the prevention of pressure sores in the intensive care unit: Systematic review. Balikesir Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;7(1):42-50
  3. Aslan A, Giersbergen YV. Nurses attitudes towards pressure ulcer preven- tion in Turkey. J Tissue Viability. 2016;25(1):66-73. [Crossref] 4. Atılgan Y, Karadeniz B. The evaluation of the effects of the decubit pre- vention attempts in the patients whose pressure injury risk is defined early. Yogun Bakim Hemsireligi Dergisi. 2007;1(2):62-66
  4. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick reference guide. 2010
  5. Şendir M. Prevention and care of pressure sores. FNHYO Dergisi. 2005;13(54):53-63
  6. Ushera K, Woodsa C, Brownb J, et al. Australian nursing students’ knowl- edge and attitudes towards pressure injury prevention: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;81(May 2018):14-20. [Crossref] 8. Ünver S, Yıldırım M, Akyolcu N, Kanan N. Concept analysis of pressure sores. FN Hemsirelik Dergisi. 2014;22(3):168-171
  7. Üstün Y. Basınç Ülserlerini Önlemeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması, Geçerlik Ve Güvenirliğinin Incelenmesi [Master’s Thesis]. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2013
  8. Bennett G, Dealey C, Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age and Aging. 2004;33(3):230-235. [Crossref] 11. Karadağ AA, Karadağ A. Assessment of nurses’ knowledge and practice in prevention and management of deep tissue injury and stage I pressure ulcer. J Wound Ost Contin Nurs. 2010;37(5):487-494. [Crossref] 12. Çeki F. Hemşirelerin Basınç Yarası Konusunda Bilgi Ve Uygulamaları [Master’s Thesis]. Lefke: Lefke Avrupa Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018
  9. Demarre L, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, et al. The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: A systematic review. Int J Nurse Study. 2015;52(11):1754-1774. [Crossref 14. Tülek Z, Polat C, Özkan İ, Theofanidis D, Togrol RE. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assess- ment instrument. J Tis Viab. 2016;25(4):201-208. [Crossref] 15. Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcıa-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, Lopez- Ortega J. Pressure ulcer care in Spain: Nurses, knowledge and clini