Journals / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Prenatal Attachment and Social SupportLevels of Pregnant Women in the Third Trimester and Factors Affectingthis Relationship

Pages
138–144
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: It was found that the mean score obtained by the pregnant women from the SocialSupport Scale was 57.93 ± 13.76 and the mean score from the Prenatal Attachment Invento ry was 61.84 ± 10.07.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the relationship between pre natal attachment and perceived social support levels of pregnant women in the third trimester.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study sample consisted of 152 pregnant women who applied to the Non-StressTest Outpatient Clinic of a public hospital between July 21 and September 22, 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: It was found that the mean score obtained by the pregnant women from the SocialSupport Scale was 57.93 ± 13.76 and the mean score from the Prenatal Attachment Invento ry was 61.84 ± 10.07.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the relationship between pre natal attachment and perceived social support levels of pregnant women in the third trimester. Methods: The study sample consisted of 152 pregnant women who applied to the Non-StressTest Outpatient Clinic of a public hospital between July 21 and September 22, 2017. Data werecollected using a questionnaire form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support,and the Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Descriptive statistics from the data obtained wereevaluated using Student's t-test for comparison of two group means and one-way analysis ofvariance for comparing more than two group means. Pearson correlation coefficient was usedto determine the relationship between two continuous variables. Results: It was found that the mean score obtained by the pregnant women from the SocialSupport Scale was 57.93 ± 13.76 and the mean score from the Prenatal Attachment Invento ry was 61.84 ± 10.07. Social support and prenatal attachment levels were greater in pregnantwomen with high school and higher levels of education. In addition, it was found that prenatalattachment levels were lower among pregnant women with a history of abortion and 3 or morepregnancies. There was a moderate positive correlation between the mean scores obtained fromthe Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and the Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Conclusion: It was determined that, as the perceived social support levels of pregnant womenincreased, their prenatal attachment levels also increased. In line with the results obtainedfrom the study, it is recommended that nurses, who play a key role in increasing attachmentin the prenatal period, should determine the sources and levels of social support for pregnantwomen and consider the relationship between social support and prenatal attachment withrespect to the factors affecting this relationship.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİ, F., YILMAZ, D. V., AKSOY, A., AKSU, A., ÇELEBİ, A. (2022). The Relationship Between Prenatal Attachment and Social SupportLevels of Pregnant Women in the Third Trimester and Factors Affectingthis Relationship. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 138–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/562574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Howe D, Brandon M, Hinnings D, Schofield G. Attachment theory and child maltreatment and family support a practice and assesment model. London; Macmillan Press Ltd; 1999. p. 9-20. [Crossref] 2. Dereli Yılmaz S. Prenatal Anne-Bebek Bağlanması. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi. 2013;10(3):28-33. 3. Fonagy P. Introduction to attachment theory. In Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press; 2001. p. 5-18 [Crossref] 4. Ainsworth S, Blehar C, Water E, Wall, S. Theoretical Background: Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1978. p. 3-23. 5. Yılmaz SD, Beji NK. Gebelerin stresle başa çıkma, depresyon ve prenatal bağlanma düzeyleri ve bunları etkileyen faktörler. Genel Tıp Dergisi. 2010;20(3):99-108. 6. Arslan S, Okçu G, Coşkun AM, Temiz F. Kadınların Gebeliği Algılama Durumu ve Bunu Etkileyen Faktörler. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi. 2019;6(1):179-192. [Crossref] 7. Besoain C, Santelices M. Intergenerational transmission of attachment and reflective function: a revision. Terapia Psicologica. 2009;27:113-118. [Crossref] 8. Yarcheski A, Mahon NE, Yarcheski TJ, Hanks, MM, Cannella BL. A meta-analytic study of predictors of maternal–fetal attachment. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(5):708-715. [Crossref] 9. Atalay S. Gebelikte depresyon prevalansının sosyodemografik özellikler, obstetrik risk faktörleri, kaygı düzeyi ve sosyal destek ile ilişkisi. [dissertation]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi; 1999. 10. Virit O, Akbaş E, Savaş HA, Sertbaş. G, Kandemir H. Gebelikte depresyon ve kaygı düzeylerinin sosyal destek ile ilişkisi. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2008;45(1):9-13. 11. Çalık K, Aktaş S. Gebelikte depresyon: sıklık, risk faktörleri ve tedavisi. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar. 2011;3(1):142-162. 12. Ardahan M. Sosyal destek ve hemşirelik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2006;9(2):68-75. 13. Finfgeld-Connett D. Clarification of social support. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(1):4-9. [Crossref] 14. Möhler E, Dixlus A. Social support and consolidated partnership as protective factors against stress during pregnancy and further consequences for mother and child. J Womens Health Issues Care. 2017;7(1):1-5. 15. Taşkın L. Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği (Genişletilmiş 13. Baskı). Ankara: Akademisyen Tıp Kitabevi; 2016. 16. Yıldırım A, Hacıhasanoğlu R, Karakurt P. Postpartum depresyon ile sosyal destek arasındaki ilişki ve etkileyen faktörler. Ulusla