Journals / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Nursing Students' Knowledge Level on Identification and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect: A Descriptive Study

Pages
231–240
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It may be suggested to make interventions (such as integrating into courses, opening elective courses) in the curriculum to increase the knowl- edge levels of students about the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge levels of nursing department final year students to diagnose the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect and to investigate their relationship with sociodemographic characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study was conducted with the senior students of the nursing department of a nursing faculty in İstanbul and a faculty of health sciences in Konya. 326 students partici- pated in the study. “Information Form” and “Scale for Diagnosing Symptoms and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect” were used for data collection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It may be suggested to make interventions (such as integrating into courses, opening elective courses) in the curriculum to increase the knowl- edge levels of students about the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge levels of nursing department final year students to diagnose the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect and to investigate their relationship with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: The study was conducted with the senior students of the nursing department of a nursing faculty in İstanbul and a faculty of health sciences in Konya. 326 students partici- pated in the study. “Information Form” and “Scale for Diagnosing Symptoms and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect” were used for data collection. Data were evaluated with mean, standard deviation, frequency, Student t test, One Way ANOVA test, Pearson Correlation, and Regres- sion analysis. Results: The average score of the students was 3.55 ± 0.29. The lowest score (2.96 ± 0.38) was obtained from the sub-dimension of the Characteristics of Abuse and Neglected Children; they received the highest scores Symptoms of Neglect (3.97 ± 0.50); Physical Symptoms of Abuse and Neglect in Children (3.70 ± 0.37). Conclusion: When the level of knowledge of abuse and neglect was compared with the maximum score of 5.0 in each subscale and total scale score, the level of knowledge of the students was not at the desired level. It may be suggested to make interventions (such as integrating into courses, opening elective courses) in the curriculum to increase the knowl- edge levels of students about the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect

🔖

Cite This Article

Gözen, D., Besirik, S. A., Erkut, Z. (2022). Nursing Students' Knowledge Level on Identification and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect: A Descriptive Study. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 231–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/562549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Teicher MH, Samson JA. Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. JChild Psychol and Psychiatry. 2016
  2. 57(3):241-266. [Crossref] 2. Tıraşçı Y, Gören S. Çocuk istismarı ve ihmali. Dicle Med J. 2007
  3. 34(1):70-74. 3. Cook A, Spinazzola J, Ford J, et al. Complex trauma in children and adolescents. Psychiatric Annals. 2005
  4. 35(5):390-398. [Crossref] 4. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009
  5. 373(9657): 68-81.[Crossref] 5. Burç A, Tüfekci FG. Occurance of diagnosis by nurses of symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect. Acibadem Üniversitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015
  6. 6 144-151 (3 ). 6. Kostak MA, Vatansever C. Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Çocuk İstismar ve İhmali ile İlgili Görüş ve Düşünceleri. Saglik Bilimleri Ve Mesle- kleri Dergisi. 2015
  7. 2(1):1-11. [Crossref] 7. Bilge YD, Tasar MA, Kilinçoglu B, Özmen S, Tiras Ü. Alt sosyoekonomik düzeye sahip anne-babalarin çocuk istismari ve ihmali hakkindaki bilgi düzeyleri, deneyimleri ve kullandiklari disiplin yöntemleri/Socioeconomic status lower levels of parental knowledge about child abuse, neglect, experiences and discipline methods used. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2013
  8. 14(1):27. 8. Zeanah CH, Humphreys KL. Child abuse and neglect. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018
  9. 57(9):637-644. [Crossref] 9. Geçkil E. Çocuklarda fiziksel istismar ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı. Gümüshane Üniversitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017
  10. 6 1:129-139. 10. Hoft M, Haddad L. Screening children for abuse and neglect: A review of the literature. J Forensic Nurs. 2017
  11. 13(1):26-34. [Crossref] 11. Widom CS, Czaja SJ, DuMont KA. Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect: Real or detection bias? Science. 2015
  12. 347(6229):1480- 1485. [Crossref] 12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: A Technical Pack Age for Policy, Norm, and Programmatic Activities. Atlanta, Georgia
  13. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violencepre vention/pdf/can-prevention-technical-package.pdf. 13. Schilling S, Christian CW. Child physical abuse and neglect. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014
  14. 23(2):309-319. [Crossref] 14. Kılıç A, Özçetin M. Çocuk istismarı ve ihmalini önlemede kanıta dayalı yaklaşımlar. Firat Tip Dergisi. 2018
  15. 23(3):107-112. 15. Geeraert L, Van Den Noortgate W, Grietens H, Onghena P. The effects of early prevention pr