Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Cognitive flexibility among female migraine patients: case–control study

Kadın migren hastalarında bilişsel esneklik: vaka-kontrol çalışması

Pages
278–289
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, in our study group, patients with migraine show better problem solving and cognitive flexibility ability than the healthy control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if cognition is affected in female migraine sufferers by comparing cognitive domains with a healthy control group.Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with migraine and 50 healthy controls (all female) were enrolled in this cross-sectional case–control study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Using a multivariate logistic regression model of migraine, WCST non-perseverative error (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.028–2.568; p = 0.03), WCST percent of perseverative error (OR, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.071–0.786; p = 0.01), WCST perseverative response (OR, 4.55; 95%CI, 1.272–16.298; p = 0.02), no alcohol consumption (OR, 0.006; 95%CI, 0.000–0.943; p = 0.04), family history of hypertension (OR, 4.46; 95%CI, 1.114–17.915; p = 0.03), family history of migraine (OR, 4.028; 95%CI, 1.027–15.799; p = 0.04), and no family history of stroke (OR, 0.034; 95%CI, 0.003–0.448; p = 0.01) were significant factorsConclusion: Among WCST scores, non-perseverative error provides insight into the patient’s problem solving ability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, in our study group, patients with migraine show better problem solving and cognitive flexibility ability than the healthy control group.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Migren · kognisyon · yürütücü işlevler

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if cognition is affected in female migraine sufferers by comparing cognitive domains with a healthy control group.Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with migraine and 50 healthy controls (all female) were enrolled in this cross-sectional case–control study. The Beck Depression test, Beck Anxiety test, California Verbal Learning Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were performed in both groups. Results: Using a multivariate logistic regression model of migraine, WCST non-perseverative error (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.028–2.568; p = 0.03), WCST percent of perseverative error (OR, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.071–0.786; p = 0.01), WCST perseverative response (OR, 4.55; 95%CI, 1.272–16.298; p = 0.02), no alcohol consumption (OR, 0.006; 95%CI, 0.000–0.943; p = 0.04), family history of hypertension (OR, 4.46; 95%CI, 1.114–17.915; p = 0.03), family history of migraine (OR, 4.028; 95%CI, 1.027–15.799; p = 0.04), and no family history of stroke (OR, 0.034; 95%CI, 0.003–0.448; p = 0.01) were significant factorsConclusion: Among WCST scores, non-perseverative error provides insight into the patient’s problem solving ability. Meanwhile, percent perseverative error and perseverative response scores provide insight into cognitive flexibility ability. Therefore, in our study group, patients with migraine show better problem solving and cognitive flexibility ability than the healthy control group.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amacımız kadın migren hastalarıyla sağlıklı kontrol grubun farklı kognitif becerilerini uygun nöropsikolojik testlerle kıyaslamak ve kadın migren hastalarında kognitif etkilenmenin eğer var ise, ne yönde olduğunu göstermektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu kesitsel vaka-kontrol çalışmasına elli kadın migren hastası ve elli sağlıklı kontrol kadın katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Beck Depresyon testi, Beck Anksiyete testi, California Sözel Öğrenme Testi, Montreal Kognitif Değerlendirme Ölçeği ve Wisconsin Kard Eşleme Testi (WKET) her iki gruba uygulanan testlerdi. Bulgular: WKET perseverative olmayan hata (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.028–2.568; p = 0.03), WKET perseveratif hata yüzdesi (OR, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.071–0.786; p = 0.01), WKET perseveratif tepki (OR, 4.55; 95%CI, 1.272–16.298; p = 0.02), alkol kullanmama (OR, 0.006; 95%CI, 0.000–0.943; p = 0.04), ailede hipertansiyon hikayesi (OR, 4.46; 95%CI, 1.114–17.915; p = 0.03), ailede migren hikayesi (OR, 4.028; 95%CI, 1.027–15.799; p = 0.04), and ailede inme hikayesi olmaması (OR, 0.034; 95%CI, 0.003–0.448; p = 0.01) migreni oluşturan multivaryat lojistik regresyon modelinde yer aldı.Sonuç: WKET skorlarından perseveratif olmayan hata kişinin problem çözme becerisini gösterir. Perseveratif hata yüzdesi ve perseveratif tepki ise kişinin bilişsel esnekliğini yani değişken görevler karşısında devam ettirdiği beceriyi gösterir. Dolayısıyla çalışma grubumuzda kadın migren hastalarında sağlıklı kontrol gruba göre problem çözme yeteneği ve bilişsel esneklik kabiliyetinin daha üstün olduğu gösterildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, R. K., GÜR, S. Ö. (2020). Cognitive flexibility among female migraine patients: case–control study. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 278–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/56237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Leonardi M, Raggi A. Burden of migraine: international perspectives. Neurol Sci. 2013;34:117–8
  2. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The epidemiology, burden, and comorbidities of migraine. Neurol Clin. 2009;27:321– 34
  3. Martins IP, Gil-Gouveia R, Silva C, Maruta C, Oliveira AG. Migraine, headaches, and cognition. Headache. 2012;52:1471-82
  4. Mulder EJ, Linssen WH, Passchier J, Orlebeke JF, de Geus EJ. Interictal and postictal cognitive changes in migraine. Cephalalgia. 1999;19:557-65
  5. Lo Buono V, Bonanno L, Corallo F, Palmeri R, Allone C, Lo Presti R et al. Cognitive functions and psychological symptoms in migraine: a study on patients with and without aura. Int J Neurosci. 2019;129:588-592
  6. Tunç A, Tekeşin AK, Güngen BD, Arda E. Cognitive performance in young and middle-aged adults with migraine: Investigating the correlation with white matter hyperintensities and psychological symptoms. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018;52:470-6
  7. Pellegrino BC, Goulart AC, Santos IS, Suemoto CK, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IJ. Migraine and cognitive function: Baseline findings from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health: ELSA-Brasil. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1525-34
  8. D’Andrea G, Nertempi P, Milone FF, Joseph R, Cananzi AR. Personality and memory in childhood migraine. Cephalalgia. 1989;9:25–8
  9. Parisi P, Verrotti A, Paolino MC, Urbano A, Bernabucci M, Castaldo R et al. Headache and cognitive profile in children: a cross-sectional controlled study. J Headache Pain. 2010;11:45–51
  10. Moutran AR, Villa TR, Diaz LA, Noffs MH, Pinto MM, Gabbai AA, et al. Migraine and cognition in children: a controlled study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69:192–5
  11. Gaist D, Pedersen L, Madsen C, Tsiropoulos I, Bak S, Sindrup S, et al. Long-term effects of migraine on cognitive function: a population-based study of Danish twins. Neurology. 2005;64:600-7
  12. Pearson AJ, Chronicle EP, Maylor EA, Bruce LA. Cognitive function is not impaired in people with a long history of migraine: a blinded study. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:74–80
  13. Baars MA, van Boxtel MP, Jolles J. Migraine does not affect cognitive decline: results from the Maastricht aging study. Headache. 2010 50 176-84
  14. Rist PM, Kurth T. Migraine and cognitive decline: a topical review. Headache. 2013;53:589-98
  15. Rist PM, Dufouil C, Glymour MM, Tzourio C, Kurth T. Migraine and cognitive decline in the populationbased EVA study. Cephalalgia. 2011; 31:1291–300
  16. Leijdekkers ML, Passchier J, Goudswaard P, Menges LJ, Orlebeke JF. Migra