Journals / Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey

Pages
77–94
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that (i) most frequently encountered challenges are non-technical rather than technical; (ii) benefits realized in the post-occupancy period overweigh the pre-occupancy benefits; and (iii) experiential features of the commissioning agents are more important for the commissioning agent selection process than the technical and managerial features.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Advances in technology give rise to buildings with complicated systems and components.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study contributes to the body of knowledge by presenting the main observations on building commissioning practices in a developing country and providing recommendations to enhance the commissioning performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that (i) most frequently encountered challenges are non-technical rather than technical; (ii) benefits realized in the post-occupancy period overweigh the pre-occupancy benefits; and (iii) experiential features of the commissioning agents are more important for the commissioning agent selection process than the technical and managerial features.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Advances in technology give rise to buildings with complicated systems and components. Many building systems fail to perform as intended owing to lack of a systematic approach adopted during construction. Commissioning is known to enhance the building's operational efficiency through bringing a holistic perspective to design, construction, and operation. This study aims to investigate the building commissioning practices in Turkey with the intention of promoting energy efficient building communities in developing countries. Within this context, a questionnaire survey was designed and administered to the commissioning practitioners to explore their perceptions and experiences regarding a number of critical commissioning issues. The findings reveal that (i) most frequently encountered challenges are non-technical rather than technical; (ii) benefits realized in the post-occupancy period overweigh the pre-occupancy benefits; and (iii) experiential features of the commissioning agents are more important for the commissioning agent selection process than the technical and managerial features. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by presenting the main observations on building commissioning practices in a developing country and providing recommendations to enhance the commissioning performance. It is expected to provide a better understanding of the critical issues in building commissioning process and promote its implementation in developing countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILICALI, E., ÖZORHON, B., ÇAĞLAYAN, S. (2022). Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 77–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/562250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. EIA. International Energy Outlook. Energy Information Administration, Washington, United States, 2017
  2. Turkoglu H, Polat G, Damci A (2020). Assessment of materials and resources credit achievements of LEED certified buildings in Turkey based on certification levels. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 3(1): 17-28
  3. Rana MJ, Hasan MR (2020). The effects of thermal insulation on energy consumption in small office buildings in the context of subtropical monsoon climate. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 3(4): 275-292
  4. Kirant HT, Sozer H (2020). Assessing the indoor comfort conditions through energy performance and CFD analyses for a traditional masonry chimney. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 3(4): 264-274
  5. Tözer KD, Gürcanlı GE, Yarkıner Z (2022). Analysis of workday losses due to falls from scaffoldings in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 5(1): 15-27
  6. Djuric N, Novakovic V (2009). Review of possibilities and necessities for building lifetime commissioning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(2): 486-492
  7. Wang L, Greenberg S, Fiegel J, Rubalcava A, Earni S, Pang X, Yin R, Woodworth S, Hernandez-Maldonado J (2013). Monitoring-based HVAC commissioning of an existing office building for energy efficiency. Applied Energy 102: 1382-1390
  8. Yigit S, Ozorhon B (2021). Effectiveness of standalone simulation-based optimization software in optimizing the life cycle cost of residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 4(4): 210-228
  9. Burnett J (2008). Costs and benefits of building commissioning. HKIE Transactions 15(2): 9-15
  10. Ma JJ, Du G, Zhang ZK, Wang PX, Xie BC (2017). Life cycle analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a typical large office building in Tianjin, China. Building and Environment 117: 36-48
  11. Miraj P, Berawi MA, Utami SR (2021). Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost–benefit evaluation. Building Research & Information 49(6): 1-15
  12. Maby C, Gwilliam J (2021). Integrating energy efficiency into private home repair, maintenance and improvement practice in England and Wales. Building Research & Information 1-14
  13. Hu M (2020). Life-cycle environmental assessment of energy-retrofit strategies on a campus scale. Building Research & Information 48(6): 659-680. [14]