SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2010 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Artroskopik girişimlerde ünilateral spinal levobupivakain, levobupivakain-fentanyl ve levobupivakain-morfin kombinasyonlarının analjezik ve hemodinamik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparing analgesic and hemodynamic effects of unilateral spinal levobupivacaine, levobupivacaine-fentanyl and levobupivacaine-morphine combinations for arthroscopic procedures

Pakize KIRDEMİR
Sinem SARI
Sadık ÖZMEN
Dilek KARAASLAN
Özlem ÖZORAK
Tuncer Tülay PEKER
Pages
75–80
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Group LM had significantly longer FAN time compare with other groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Aim of the study was to compare the analgesic and hemodynamic effects of levobupivacaine, levobupivacaine-fentanyl, levobupivacaine-morphine for arthroscopic knee surgery under unilateral spinal anesthesia.Methods: A total of 44 ASA I/II patients scheduled for arthroscopy were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Spinal puncture was performed at L3–4/L4–5 intervertebral space.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Group LM had significantly longer FAN time compare with other groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Aim of the study was to compare the analgesic and hemodynamic effects of levobupivacaine, levobupivacaine-fentanyl, levobupivacaine-morphine for arthroscopic knee surgery under unilateral spinal anesthesia.Methods: A total of 44 ASA I/II patients scheduled for arthroscopy were included in the study. After prehydration patients kept in a lateral position on the nondependent side. Spinal puncture was performed at L3–4/L4–5 intervertebral space. Patients divided into three subgroups: Group L (n=14) received 0.5% levobupivacaine 1 ml+1 ml distilled water; Group LF (n=15), 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 ml)+0.5 ml distilled water; and Group LM (n=15), 0.01 mg morphine (0.5 ml)+0.5 ml distilled water. Patients remained in that position for 15 minutes. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before and 1st, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minutes after the block and every 15 minutes during the operation. Motor blockade and sensorial level, side effects, motor block regression time (MBRT), first urination time and first analgesic need (FAN) were recorded. Results: Group LM had the longest MBRT, but difference with other groups did not reach to a significant level (p>0.05). Group LM had significantly longer FAN time compare with other groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Artroskopik diz cerrahisi uygulanacak hastalara ünilateral spinal anestezide levobupivakain, levobupivakain-fentanyl, levobupivakain-morfinin analjezik ve hemodinamik etkinliğinin karşılaştırılmasını amaçladık.Yöntem: ASA I-II 44 olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm olgular prehidrasyon sonrası opere olacak taraf üstte kalacak şekilde lateral dekübit pozisyona getirildi. Spinal iğne ile L3-L4/L4-L5 spinal aralığından girildi. Tüm gruplarda %0.5 levobupivakain 1ml ilaveten Grup L 1 ml distile su, Grup LF 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 ml)+0.5 ml distile su, Grup LM 0.01 mg morfin (0.5 ml)+0.5 ml distile su toplam 2 ml olacak şekilde verildi. Hastalar 15 dakika bu pozisyonda yatırıldı. Hastaların tansiyon, kalp atım hızı ve oksijen satürasyon değerleri blok öncesi, blok sonrası 1.,3.,5.,10.,15.,20.,30.dakikalarda ve operasyon boyunca 15 dakikada bir kayıt edildi. Motor blok ve duyu seviyesi, yan etkiler, motor blok gerileme zamanı (MBGZ), ilk idrar yapma zamanı ve ilk analjezik gereksinimi (İAG) kayıt edildi. Bulgular: MBGZ Grup LM de en uzun bulundu ancak anlamlı değildi (p>0.05). İAG Grup LM de daha geç bulundu ve aradaki fark Grup L’ye göre anlamlı idi (p0.05). Grup L de motor blok oluşumu daha azdı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRDEMİR, P., SARI, S., ÖZMEN, S., KARAASLAN, D., ÖZORAK, Ö., PEKER, T. T. (2022). Artroskopik girişimlerde ünilateral spinal levobupivakain, levobupivakain-fentanyl ve levobupivakain-morfin kombinasyonlarının analjezik ve hemodinamik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 75–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/562075

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Appelleri G, Aldegheri G, Danelli G et al. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2005;101:77–82
  2. Greene NM. Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 1985; 64:715–30
  3. Cousins MJ, Veering BT. Neural Blockade. In clinical anaesthesia and management of pain. Lipincott-Raven Publishers, Philedelphia-Newyork 1998; 243–320
  4. Pederson H, Finster M. Selection and use of local anesthetic: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynocology 1987; 30:505–13
  5. Gustafsson LL, Hallin ZW. Spinal opioid analgesia. Drugs 1988; 35:597–603
  6. Kirson LE, Goldman JM, Slover RE. Low dose intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing transuretral resection of the prostate. Anesthesiology 1989;71: 192–5
  7. DahI JB, Rosenborg J, Dirkes WE. Prevention of postoperative pain by balanced analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:518–20
  8. Ben-David B, Solomon E, Levin H, Admoni H, Goldik Z. Intrathecal fentanyl with small-dose dilute bupivacaine: Better anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Anesth Analg 1997;85:560–5
  9. Abbound TK, Dror A, Mosaad P et al. Mini-dose intrathecal morphine for relief of postcesarean section pain: Safety, efficacy and ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Anesth Analg 1988;67:137–40
  10. Fanelli G, Borghi B, Casati A, Bertini L, Montebugnoli M, Torri G. Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Italian Study Group on Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47: 746-51
  11. Casati A, Fanelli G, Cappelleri G et al. Low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 850-4
  12. Durmuş M, Türköz A, Toğal T et al. Bupivakaine fentanil ilave edilmesi tek taraflı spinal bloğu etkilermi? Türk Anest ve Rean Cem 2001; 29; 2:65–8
  13. Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamaki KK, Pitkanen MT. A low dose of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 605–10
  14. Covino BG, Scolt DB, Lambert DH. Pharmacological considerations, baricity of anaesthetic solutions. In: Covino BG eds. Handbook of spinal anaesthesia and analgesia. Fribourg 1, Switzerland: Medialobe SA Qublishor,1994,89–93
  15. McLeod GA. Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose. Br J Anaesth, 2004; 92: 547-51
  16. Alley EA, Kopacz DJ, McDona