Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2012 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Stapler hemoroidopeksi: 65 olguda klinik sonuçlar

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: Clinical results of 65 cases

Pages
340–344
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Particularly in 3rd degree hemorrhoidal disease, Longo s technique can be suggested as an alternative to classical methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To present results of our patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy due to hemorrhoidal disease and discuss in accompaniment with the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: The patients, who diagnosed by 3rd-4th degree hemorrhoidal disease and underwent hemorrhoidopexy with Longo method between January, 2009 and April, 2011, were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Particularly in 3rd degree hemorrhoidal disease, Longo s technique can be suggested as an alternative to classical methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To present results of our patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy due to hemorrhoidal disease and discuss in accompaniment with the literature. Material and methods: The patients, who diagnosed by 3rd-4th degree hemorrhoidal disease and underwent hemorrhoidopexy with Longo method between January, 2009 and April, 2011, were included. All data were prospectively collected and retrospectively examined. The patients were evaluated in terms of demographic properties, complaints on admission, and postoperative complications. Results: Forty-three (66%) of 65 patients were male, 22 (34%) were female. The mean age was 38±11.9 (range:23-76) years. The most frequent complaints were bleeding, swelling, itching, pain, constipation respectively. Third degree hemorrhoid was present in fifty-eight (89%) patients, 4th degree hemorrhoid was in 7 (11%) patients. The mean operation duration was 37.6±8.1(range:24-55) minutes, the mean hospitalization duration was 27±7.8 (range:20-76) hours. One or more complication developed in total 17 (26%) patients. As complication, bleeding was determined in 13 (20%) patients, pain was in 6 (9%), urinary retention was in 2 (3%), tenesmus was in 3 (5%), external hemorrhoidal thrombosis was in 1 (2%), and recurrence was in 4 (6%). Conclusions: The patients can return their daily activities early with stapled hemorrhoidopexy because of less pain and quick recovery period. We consider that appropriate patient selection and proper application of the technique are important in the success of this method. Particularly in 3rd degree hemorrhoidal disease, Longo s technique can be suggested as an alternative to classical methods.

Özet

Amaç: Hemoroidal hastalık sebebiyle stapler hemoroidopeksi uyguladığımız hastalarımızın sonuçlarını sunmak ve literatür eşliğinde tartışmak. Gereç ve yöntem: Ocak 2009- Nisan 2011 tarihleri arasında 3-4. derece hemoroidal hastalık tanısı konan ve Longo yöntemiyle hemoroidopeksi uygulanan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm veriler prospektif toplanıp retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar; demografik özellikler, başvuru sırasındaki şikayetler, ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 65 hastadan 43 (% 66)ü erkek, 22 (% 34)si kadındı. Ortalama yaş 38±11.9 (23-76) yıl idi. Olguların en sık başvuru şikayetleri sıklık sırasına göre kanama, şişlik, kaşıntı, ağrı, kabızlık şeklinde idi. Elli sekiz (% 89) hastada 3. derece, 7 (%11) hastada 4. derece hemoroid mevcuttu. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 37.6±8.1(24-55) dakika, ortalama yatış süresi 27±7.8 (20-76) saat idi. Toplam 17 (% 26) hastada bir ya da daha fazla komplikasyon gelişti. Komplikasyon olarak 13 (% 20) hastada kanama, 6 (%9)sında ağrı, 2 (% 3)sinde idrar retansiyonu, 3 (% 5)ünde tenezm, 1 (% 2) inde eksternal hemoroidal tromboz, 4 (%6)ünde ise nüks saptandı. Sonuç: Stapler hemoroidopekside ağrının az ve iyileşme sürecinin hızlı olması nedeniyle hastalar günlük aktivitelerine erken dönebilmektedirler. Bu yöntemin başarısında uygun hasta seçimi ve tekniğin doğru uygulanmasının önemli olduğunu düşünmekteyiz. Özellikle 3.derece hemoroidal hastalıkta Longo tekniği klasik yöntemlere alternatif olarak önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PERGEL, A., ŞAHİN, D. A., AYDIN, İ., YÜCEL, A. F. (2022). Stapler hemoroidopeksi: 65 olguda klinik sonuçlar. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 340–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/561929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Demirbaş S, Aktaş O, Öğün İ, Yağcı G. Haemorrhoidectomy by using circular stapler in grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. T Klin J Med Sci 2002;22(1):36-41
  2. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88(5):669-74
  3. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001;182(1):64-8
  4. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355(9206):779-81
  5. Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005;242(1):29-35
  6. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137(12):1395-406
  7. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(6):826-8
  8. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, Lin JK. Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46(1):116-7
  9. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356(9231):730-3
  10. Herold A, Kirsch JJ. Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356(9231):2187-90
  11. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000;355(9206):768-9 12. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, et al. Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002;6(2):83-8
  12. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular-suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic. Rome, Italy: Surgery; 1998
  13. Terzi C, Füzün M. Anorektumun Benign Hastalıkları. Sayek İ. Temel Cerrahi 3. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi, 2004:1256-68 15. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2