Journals / Journal of childhood, education & society (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

STEM starts early: Views and beliefs of early childhood education stakeholders in Tanzania

Pages
29–42
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Though there was consensus among ECE stakeholders that children should be exposed to STEM environments as early as possible, findings indicated that even among ECE practitioners, there is a very vague understanding of what entails of STEM education in ECE.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For about a decade, Tanzania has intensely focused on developing literacy and numeracy skills in pre-primary and early grades programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To enhance the 21st century skills necessary for building a middle income and knowledge-based economies, the existing empirical evidence emphasizes the need for STEM education starting from pre-primary level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Though there was consensus among ECE stakeholders that children should be exposed to STEM environments as early as possible, findings indicated that even among ECE practitioners, there is a very vague understanding of what entails of STEM education in ECE.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

For about a decade, Tanzania has intensely focused on developing literacy and numeracy skills in pre-primary and early grades programs. Recently, the attention has shifted towards the significance of teaching Science, Mathematics, Technology and Science (STEM) in the early years. To enhance the 21st century skills necessary for building a middle income and knowledge-based economies, the existing empirical evidence emphasizes the need for STEM education starting from pre-primary level. This paper aims to unpack the state of the STEM education in pre-primary education in Tanzania. By using homogenous purposive sampling, two policy-makers, three ECE academics, eight school principals, and eight pre-primary teachers from rural and urban public schools were recruited. Data were collected by interviews, semi-structured survey questionnaires, and documentary analyses. Though there was consensus among ECE stakeholders that children should be exposed to STEM environments as early as possible, findings indicated that even among ECE practitioners, there is a very vague understanding of what entails of STEM education in ECE. Further, while teachers were aware and guided to facilitate science and mathematics education, they were not aware and there were no specific policy briefs/circular instructions on how to facilitate Technology and Engineering education in ECE. The paper concludes with suggestions on how to integrate STEM in early childhood education, especially for Tanzania.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ndijuye, L. G., Tandika, P. B. (2022). STEM starts early: Views and beliefs of early childhood education stakeholders in Tanzania. Journal of childhood, education & society (Online), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 29–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/560817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aboud, F., & Hosain, K. (2010). The impact of pre-primary school on primary school achievement in Bangladesh. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 237-246.
  2. Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
  3. Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here”? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316-332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606915.019 Black, M. M., Walker, S.P., Fernald, L.H., Andersen, C.T., Digirolamo, A. M.,Lu, C., … Grantham-McGregor, S. (2016). Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. Lancet, 1, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7.
  4. Bowden, J. (2005). Reflections on the phenomenographic research process. J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), In Doing developmental phenomenography. Qualitative research methods series. Melbourne, Victoria: RMIT University Press.
  5. Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  6. Buckler, A. (2015). Quality teaching in rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Different perspectives, values and capabilities. International Journal of Educational Development, 40(2), 126-133.
  7. Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 160–218.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: A qualitative, quantitative & mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publishers.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: A qualitative, quantitative & mixed method approaches (4rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publishers.
  10. Doryan, A., Cautam, K. C., & Foege, W. H. (2002). The political challenge: Commitment and cooperation. In M. E. Young (Ed.), Investing in our children’s future: From early childhood development to human development (pp. 375-391). Washington D.C.: The World Bank. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
  11. Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, & behavior problems. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither Opportunity (pp. 47–69). New