Journals / Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology / 2007 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Muğla ve ilçelerine ait Drosophila melanogaster populasyonlarında insektisit direncinin biyokimyasal temellerinin ve esteraz enzim profilinin PAGE yšntemi kullanılarak belirlenmesi

The biochemical basis of insecticide resistance and determination of esterase enzyme patterns by using page in field collected populations of Drosophila melanogaster from Muğla province of Turkey

Pages
31–40
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Twenty one different esterase bands were detected when a- and (3-naphtyl acetate were used as substrates and the bands were classified as 18 a-esterases, 2 (3-esterases and 1 a/(3 esterase.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biochemical and molecular biology methods provide more specific information about the resistance potential or the development of resistance in field populations of living organisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Percent remaining activities of AChE were found to be significantly higher in all strains compared to the activities of the susceptible one.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Twenty one different esterase bands were detected when a- and (3-naphtyl acetate were used as substrates and the bands were classified as 18 a-esterases, 2 (3-esterases and 1 a/(3 esterase.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Biochemical and molecular biology methods provide more specific information about the resistance potential or the development of resistance in field populations of living organisms. In this research, the enzymatic activities of Glutathione-S-transferase (GST), percent remaining acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and general esterase were measured in Drosophila melanogaster populations collected from different towns of Muğla Province. Furthermore, esterase enzyme patterns of these populations were determined by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Percent remaining activities of AChE were found to be significantly higher in all strains compared to the activities of the susceptible one. Twenty one different esterase bands were detected when a- and (3-naphtyl acetate were used as substrates and the bands were classified as 18 a-esterases, 2 (3-esterases and 1 a/(3 esterase.

Özet

Biyokimyasal ve moleküler biyoloji teknikleri, doğal populasyonlarda, potansiyel veya gelişmekte olan direnç mekanizmaları hakkında çok spesifik bilgiler sağlamaktadır. Bu araştırmada, Muğla ve ilçelerinden toplanan Drosophila melanogaster populasyonlarında glutatyon-S-transferaz (GST), yüzde kalan asetilkolin esteraz (AChE) ve genel esteraz aktiviteleri ölçülmüştür. Bununla birlikte poliakrilamid jel elektroforezi (PAGE) yöntemi kullanılarak örneklerdeki esteraz enzim profilleri belirlenmiştir. Yüzde kalan asetilkolin esteraz enzim aktivitesi incelenen örneklerde duyarlı soya göre yüksek bulunmuştur, a ve (3-naftil asetatın substrat olarak kullanılması ile toplam 21 esteraz bandı elde edilmiştir, bu bantların 18 tanesi a esteraz, iki tanesi (3 esteraz ve bir tanesi ise a/B esteraz olarak sınıflandırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, T., KÜÇÜKAKYÜZ, K., ÇÖL, B., TAŞKIN, G. B., TALKIN, V. (2022). Muğla ve ilçelerine ait Drosophila melanogaster populasyonlarında insektisit direncinin biyokimyasal temellerinin ve esteraz enzim profilinin PAGE yšntemi kullanılarak belirlenmesi. Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 31–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/560641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahmed S and Wilkins RM. Studies on some enzymes involved in insecticide resistance in fenitrothion resistant and -susceptible strains of Musca domestica L.(Dipt, Muscidae). J Appl Entomol. 126 (9): 510-516, 2002. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantisation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72: 248-254, 1976.
  2. Campbell PM, Yen JL and Masoumi A. Cross-resistance patterns among Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) resistant to organophosphorus insecticides. J Economic Entomol. 91(2): 367-375, 1998. Charpentier A and Fournier D. Levels of total acetylcholinesterase in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to insecticide resistance. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 70(2): 100-107, 2001.
  3. Chen Z, Newcomb R, Forbes E, McKenzie J and Batterham P. The acetylcholinesterase gene and organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem and Mol Bio. 31: 805-816, 2001.
  4. Claudianos C, Russell RJ and Oakeshott JG. The same amino acid substitution in orthologous esterases confers organophosphate resistance on the house fly and a blowfly. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 29(8): 675-686, 1999.
  5. Enayati AA, Ranson H and Hemingway J. Insect glutathione transferases and insecticide resistance. Insect Molecular Biology. 14(1): 3-8, 2005. Feyereisen R. Molecular biology of insecticide resistance. Toxicology Letters. 82(3): 83-90, 1995. Field LM and Devonshire AL. Evidence that the E4 and FE4 esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are part of a gene family. Biochemical Journal. 330: 169-173, 1998.
  6. Guillemaud T, Makate N, Raymond M, Hirst B and Callaghan A. Esterase gene amplification in Culex pipiens. Insect Molecular Biology. 6(4): 319-327, 1997.
  7. Habig WH, Pabst MJ and Jakobi BW. Glutathione-S- Transferases. J Biol Chem. 249: 7130-7139, 1974.
  8. Han Z, Graham D, Moores ID and Alan L. Devonshire association between biochemical markers and insecticide resistance in the cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 62: 164-171, 1998.
  9. Healy MJ, Dumancic MM and Oakeshott JG. Biochemical and physiological studies of soluble esterases from Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet. 29: 365-388, 1991. Hemingway J. The Molecular basis of two contrasting metabolic mechanisms of insecticide resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 30: 1009-1015, 2000.
  10. Kozaki T, Shono T, Tomita T and Kon