Journals / Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF FISHING VESSEL BUYBACK PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED IN TURKEY DURING EU ACCESSION PROCESS

Pages
58–64
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In fact, most of the EU countries having advanced fishing industry decided that the reduction of fishing fleet is an effective solution and they have accepted to put it into practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There have been important developments in the number of fishing vessels, size and engine power due to low-interest loans and customs exemptions provided by the state in the 1970s and fishing vessel numbers showed a rapid increase especially after 1980 in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, marine fisheries production has been decreasing since 1985 despite the rapid development of the fishing fleet, leading to a decline in the real income of fishermen.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, most of the EU countries having advanced fishing industry decided that the reduction of fishing fleet is an effective solution and they have accepted to put it into practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There have been important developments in the number of fishing vessels, size and engine power due to low-interest loans and customs exemptions provided by the state in the 1970s and fishing vessel numbers showed a rapid increase especially after 1980 in Turkey. However, marine fisheries production has been decreasing since 1985 despite the rapid development of the fishing fleet, leading to a decline in the real income of fishermen. In Turkish seas, there are 15.680 licensed fishing vessels actively operating with different depths in 2015. When the number of fishing vessels in Turkey is compared to those of the EU countries except Italy and Spain, vessels in these countries are found to be less than in Turkey. The situation is particularly damaging the ecosystem and the fish stocks by wrong fishing techniques. One of the most important ways to solve this issue is the repurchase "buyback"programs that are commonly encouraged by regulations of the state. In fact, most of the EU countries having advanced fishing industry decided that the reduction of fishing fleet is an effective solution and they have accepted to put it into practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLGUNER, M. T., BİLGİN, E. E., YILMAZ, S. (2022). EVALUATION OF FISHING VESSEL BUYBACK PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED IN TURKEY DURING EU ACCESSION PROCESS. Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 58–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/560383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atay, D., Korkmaz, A.Ş., Polatsü, S., Yıldız, H. & Rad, F. (1995). Su Ürünleri Tüketim Projeksiyonları ve Üretim Hedefleri. Tü- rkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği IV. Teknik Kongresi, 9-13 Ocak 1995, II. Cilt, pp:.809- 823. Atay, D., Ölmez, M. & Korkmaz, A.Ş. (2000). Su Ürünleri Üretimi. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği V. Teknik Kongresi, 17-21 Ocak 2000,
  2. Milli Kütüphane, Ankara, Cilt: 2, pp: 827-843.
  3. Balta, B. (2009). AB Müktesebatına Uyumun Türk Balıkçılık Sektörüne Etkileri, ETCF, EU-Turkey Chambers Forum. Türk İş Dü- nyası için AB Mevzuatı. Eurochambers ve TOBB. pp: 90-99, Morris & Chapman, Brüksel, Belçika - http://www.morrischapman.com
  4. Çevirme, D. (2015). AB Ortak Balıkçılık Politikası Kapsamında İzleme, Denetim ve Gözetim Sistemleri ve Türkiye'deki Uygulamalar. AB Uzmanlık Tezi. T.C. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Avrupa Birliği ve Dış İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara Mayıs 2015. DPT, 1990-1994. Altıncı Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı. Yayın No: 2174, pp:60, Table:42. http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/plan6.pdf
  5. EU (1998). Turkey 1998
  6. Regular Report, European Union: European Commission. Eurostat, 2014.
  7. Europa.eu, Fishery statistics in detail - Statistics Explained. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Fishery_statistics_in_de tail (Accessed July 2016). GTHB, 2015a.
  8. SUBİS, Su ürünleri Bilgi Sistemi. http:// www.subis.tarim.gov.tr GTHB, 2015b.
  9. BSGM, Balıkçılık ve Su Ürünleri Genel Müdürlüğü. http://tarim.gov.tr/BSGM
  10. Kurt, S., Muse, B.,1984. Buyback of Fishing Rights in the US and Canada: Implications for Alaska. Presented at the 11 4th Annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society, August 1984, pp:78(FY85) Ithica, NY. Olguner M. & Yilmaz S. (2015). Action Taken for the Sustainable Fisheries in Turkey during the EU Accession Process, AE 2015,
  11. Rotterdam, Nederlands, October 2015, vol.15, no.2, pp. 855-856.
  12. Özdemir, N. & Aras, M.N. (2005). The Comparison of the Sector of Aquaculture Products from the Aspects of Production, Consumption, Export and Import in Turkey and the Europen Union (EU). Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 109-116.
  13. Ünal, V., Göncüoğlu, H. & Göktay, S. (2014). Türkiye'de Balıkçı Gemisi Geri satın alma Programının değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversity Scientific Research Project Report. Project Number: 2013/SÜF/014. Bornova, İzmir.