Journals / Journal of Applied Biological Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Effetc of the extent of root pruning on growth, biomass and nutrient content of oak (Quercus castaneifolia C. A.Mey.) seedlings

Pages
85–89
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that collar diameter growth, height growth and length of terminal inter node were significantly affected by root pruning treatments (p0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the extent of root pruning on nutrient content, biomass, vitality and nursery growth of oak seedlings (Quercus castaneifolia C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of the first year of nursery growth the main root of oak seedlings was pruned by scissors at distances of 15, 30 and 45 centimeters from collar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that collar diameter growth, height growth and length of terminal inter node were significantly affected by root pruning treatments (p0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the extent of root pruning on nutrient content, biomass, vitality and nursery growth of oak seedlings (Quercus castaneifolia C. A. Mey.). At the end of the first year of nursery growth the main root of oak seedlings was pruned by scissors at distances of 15, 30 and 45 centimeters from collar. Then, oak seedlings were planted in the field and vegetative characteristics were recorded after four growing seasons. Results showed that collar diameter growth, height growth and length of terminal inter node were significantly affected by root pruning treatments (p0.05). The lowest total biomass of oak seedlings was observed at 45 cm treatment. The pruned roots at distance of 15 cm from collar had lowest nitrogen content. Highest level of the Phosphorous content of leaves was observed at treatment of 30 and 45 cm. This study suggested that for access to better growth of oak seedlings, the 30 and 45 cm pruning treatments should be selected. The pruning treatment of 15 cm is only suitable for total biomass increasing.

🔖

Cite This Article

POURMAJIDIAN, M. R., AMMI, S., SPAHBODI, K., PARSAKHOO, A., TABARI, M. (2022). Effetc of the extent of root pruning on growth, biomass and nutrient content of oak (Quercus castaneifolia C. A.Mey.) seedlings. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 85–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/560233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aldhus JR. 1994. Nursery policy and planning. Forest Nursery Practice, vol
  2. Forestry Commission Bulletin, pp 1-12
  3. Andersen L. 2001. Survival and growth of Fagus sylvatica seedlings root-pruned prior to transplanting under competitive conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 318-323
  4. Anonymous. 1993. Forest condition in Europe, results of the 1997, Crown condition survey. Technical report by federal research center for forestry and product, 140 pp
  5. Ası´n L, Alegre S, Montserrat R. 2007. Effect of paclobutrazol, prohexadione-Ca, deficit irrigation, summer pruning and root pruning on shoot growth, yield, and return bloom, in a ‘Blanquilla’ pear orchard. Scientia Horticulturae, 113, 142-148
  6. Aynehband A. 2008. Cultivar and Nitrogen splitting effects on amaranth forage yield and weed community. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11, 80-85
  7. Burdett AN, Simpson DG, Thompson CF. 1983. Root development and plantation establishment success. Plant and Soil, 71, 103-110
  8. Gardiner ES, Hodges JD. 1998. Growth and biomass distribution of cherry bark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedling as influenced by light availability. Forest Ecology and Management, 108, 127-134
  9. Gazal RM, Blanche CA, Carandang WM. 2004. Root growth potential and seedling morphological attributes of narra (Pterocarpus indicus Willd.) transplants. Forest Ecology and Management, 195, 259-266
  10. Ghelichkhani MM, Tabari M, Akbarinia M, Espahbodi K. 2005. Influence of light intensity and root pruning on growth. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 17, 2-7. (In Persian)
  11. Habashi H, Hosseiniand SM, Rahmani R, Mohammadi J. 2007. Stand structure and spatial patterns of trees in mixed Hyrcanian beech forest, Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 1205-1212
  12. Hipps NA, Samuelson TJ, Farman LG. 2000. Effects of root wrenching on leaf mineral content of Prunus avium and Castanea sativa seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 958-963
  13. Hochholdinger F, Woll K, Sauer M, Dembinsky D. 2004. Genetic dissection of root formation in Maize (Zea mays) reveals root-type specie developmental programmers. Annals of Botany, 93, 359-368
  14. Hosseini SM, Kartoolinejad D, Mirnia SK, Tabibzadeh Z, Akbarinia M, Shayanmehr F. 2007. The effects of Viscum album L. on foliar weight and nutrients content of host trees in Caspian forest (Iran). Polish Journal of Ecology, 55, 579-583
  15. Hutchings MJ, John EA. 2004. The effects of environmental hetero