Journals / Journal of Applied Biological Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Some Medicinal Plants in Urticaceae Family

Pages
31–35
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result indicated that the antioxidant activity was not correlated with the phenolics content suggested that non-phenolic compounds might play major free radicals scavenging activity in studied plant materials

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fifteen different extracts from the leaves of Urtica d ioica, Pilea microphylla and Elatostema umbellatum were examined for phenolics content and free radical scavenging capacity, to determine their potential as a source of natural antioxidants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The highest DPPH radical scavenging percentages were showed by the butanol and ethyl acetate extracts Urtica dioica that are 62.537 ± 5.069% and 62.177 ± 2.987% at concentration 1000 µg/ml, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result indicated that the antioxidant activity was not correlated with the phenolics content suggested that non-phenolic compounds might play major free radicals scavenging activity in studied plant materials
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fifteen different extracts from the leaves of Urtica d ioica, Pilea microphylla and Elatostema umbellatum were examined for phenolics content and free radical scavenging capacity, to determine their potential as a source of natural antioxidants. The highest DPPH radical scavenging percentages were showed by the butanol and ethyl acetate extracts Urtica dioica that are 62.537 ± 5.069% and 62.177 ± 2.987% at concentration 1000 µg/ml, respectively. Total phenolic content ranged from 0.24 ± 0.15 to 100.30 ± 0.01 mg gallic acid/g dry weight. The ethyl acetate extract of Urtica dioica exhibited the lowest EC50 value (100.10 µg/ml). The result indicated that the antioxidant activity was not correlated with the phenolics content suggested that non-phenolic compounds might play major free radicals scavenging activity in studied plant materials

🔖

Cite This Article

SULAIMAN, S. F., CHAHARDEHI, A. M., IBRAHIM, D. (2022). Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Some Medicinal Plants in Urticaceae Family. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/560231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sener, B. 1994. Recent results in the search for bioactive compounds from Turkish medicinal plants. Pure and Application Chemistry, 66 (10,11), 2295-2298
  2. Hirasa, K. & Takemasa, M. 1998. Spice science and technology. Marcel Dekker: New York
  3. Velioglu,Y. S., Mazza, G., Gao, L. & Oomah, B. D. 1998. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. Journal of Agricultural Food & Chemistry, 46, 4113–4117
  4. Emmons, C. L., Peterson, D. M., & Paul, G. L. 1999. Antioxidant capacity of oat (Avena sativa L.) extracts
  5. In vitro antioxidant activity and contents of phenolic and tocopherol antioxidants. Journal of Agricultural Food & Chemistry, 47, 4894-4898
  6. Osawa, T. 1994. Novel natural antioxidants for utilization in food and biological systems. In I. Uritani, V. V. Garcia, & E. M. Mendeoza (Eds.), Postharvest biochemistry of plant food-materials in the tropics (pp. 241-251). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Scientific Societies Press
  7. Pietta, P. G. 1998. Flavonoids in medicinal plants.In C. A. Rice- Evans, & L. Packer (Eds.), Flavonoids in health and disease (pp. 61–110). New York: Dekker
  8. Shahidi, F., Janitha, P. K. & Wanasundara, P. D. 1992. Phenolic antioxidants. Critical Reviews of Food Science & Nutrition, 32(1), 67–103
  9. Stevens, P. F. 2001. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June2008.
  10. Mellidis, A. S. & Papageorgiou, V. P. 1993. Phenolic constituents from Onosma heterophylla. Journal of Natural Products, 56(6), 949-952
  11. Salvi, A., Carrupt, P. A., Tillement, J. P. & Bernard. 2001. Testa Structural damage proteins caused by free radicals: assessment, protection by antioxidants, and influence of protein binding. Biochemical Pharmacology, 61(10), 1237-1242
  12. Jerez, M., Pinelo, M. Sineiro, J. & M. J. Nunez. 2004. Influence of extraction conditions on phenolic yields from pine bark: assessment of procyanidins polymerization degree by thiolysis, Food Chemistry, 94, 406–414
  13. Pourmorad, F., Hosseinimehr, S. J. & N. Shahabimajd. 2006. Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medicinal plants. African Journal of Biotechnolog, 5 (11), 1142-1145
  14. Katalinic, V., Milos, M., Kulisic, T. & M. Jukic. 2006. Screening of 70 medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols. Food Chemistry, 94, 550-557.