Journals / Journal of American Studies of Turkey / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 51

A Rereading and Repositioning of Roles in Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman

Pages
49–71
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the final analysis, Baraka presents a true piece of Revolutionary Theater in Dutchman: powerful, accusatory and destructive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amiri Baraka’s well-known and both vastly praised and criticized play Dutchman is a primary example of Revolutionary Theater, which Baraka conceptualizes as a theater that “forces” its audience to confront the realities of social injustice, and “accuse” and “attack” its practitioners.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, Dutchman is a model text of Baraka’s compulsion toward destruction through art.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the final analysis, Baraka presents a true piece of Revolutionary Theater in Dutchman: powerful, accusatory and destructive.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Amiri Baraka · American Literature · American Poetry

Abstract

Amiri Baraka’s well-known and both vastly praised and criticized play Dutchman is a primary example of Revolutionary Theater, which Baraka conceptualizes as a theater that “forces” its audience to confront the realities of social injustice, and “accuse” and “attack” its practitioners. In this sense, Dutchman is a model text of Baraka’s compulsion toward destruction through art. This article argues that the prevalent view in the scholarship on this play reduces Clay and Lula as victim and victimizer. This article aims to present these characters in a postmodernist light, as more complex and less stereotyped. Thus, they can be seen as having equally the potential to change and the potential to destroy (themselves and/or the society). In the final analysis, Baraka presents a true piece of Revolutionary Theater in Dutchman: powerful, accusatory and destructive.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKINÇ, S. K. (2022). A Rereading and Repositioning of Roles in Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 51, 49–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/559523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Achilles, Jochen. “Allegory and Iconography in African American Drama of the Sixties: Imamu Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman and Alice Childress’s Wine in the Wilderness.” Amerikastudien/ American Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, 2000, pp. 219–238. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41157564. Adams, George R. “My Christ in Dutchman.” College Language Association Journal, vol. 15, 1971, pp. 54-58.
  2. Alfaro, María Jesús Martínez. “Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept.” Atlantis, vol. 18, no. 1/2, 1996, pp. 268-285. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41054827. Baker, Christopher. “A Trip with the Strange Woman: Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman and the Book of Proverbs.” South Atlantic Review, vol. 78, no. 3/4, 2013, pp. 110-128. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/ stable/43739218. Baraka, Amiri. Dutchman. Anthology of American Literature. Vol II: Realism to the Present, edited by George McMichael, et. al., MacMillan Publishing, 1980, pp. 1896-1908. ---. The Autobiography of LeRoi Jones. Lawrence Hill Books, 1997. ---. “The Revolutionary Theater” Liberator, July 1965 National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox: The Making of African American Identity: Vol. III, 1917-1968, pp.1-3.
  3. Bonner, Willard Hallam. “The Flying Dutchman of the Western World.” Journal of American Folklore, vol. 59, no. 233, 1946, pp. 282- 288. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/536251. Brown, Lloyd W. Amiri Baraka. G.B. Hall and Co., 1964.
  4. Derrida, Jacques. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by Alan Bass, U of Chicago P, 1982.
  5. Fanon, Frantz. Black Skins, White Masks. Pluto Books, 2008.
  6. Gohar, Saddik. “The Complicated Interfaces of Symbolism and Myth in Dutchman” International Journal of English Literature and Culture, vol. 6, no. 1, 2018, pp. 7-12.
  7. Johnson, Barbara. “Writing.” Critical Terms for Literary Study, edited by Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin, U of Chicago P, 1990, pp. 39-49.
  8. Kern, Douglas. Killing in the Name of Struggle: Amiri Baraka’s Revolutionary Theatre. The University of York. PhD dissertation, 2014.http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6365/1/Final%20 Submission%20PhD.pdf Kristeva, Julia. The Kristeva Reader. Edited by Toril Moi. Columbia UP, 1986.
  9. Kumar, Nita N. “The Logic of Retribution: Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman.” African American Review, vol. 37, no. 2/3, 2003, pp. 271-279. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1512313. Lee, A. Robert. Designs of Blackness: Studies in the Literature of African-America, Pluto Press, 1998. ProQuest Ebook Central,http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/halictr/detail. action?docID=3386112. Martin